UK Censorship, Nurses speaking out, Vaccine injuries and deaths

This covers a lot of territory. This is one of the best sources of real news in the UK. Nice to see Health Care workers finally speaking out more. The go over the vaccine deaths/injuries and explain how the reporting is under reported as with all of the reporting systems, you never get the whole truth as to the numbers.

UK Column News – 19th April 2021 They are on Bitchute if anyone wants to find them.

Here are all the show notes. A long list.

Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson and David Scott with today’s UK Column News.

00:29 – Vaccine Adverse Reactions


MHRA Yellow Card: –

MHRA Pizer ADR’s: –

MHRA Astrazeneca ADR’s: –

MHRA 2019 Statement: –

AERS Statement: –

FB Page: –

10:32 – Twitter Ban Government Vaccine ADR Statistics


VI Article: –

MHRA Reporting Summary: –

16:02 – WHO Fight The Infodemic With The UK Government


WHO Thailand Tweet: –

18:16 – UK Column Resources Censored


NSWF Part 4: –

NSWF Part 3: –

UKC Column Whistleblower Interview: –

UK Column Tweet: –

22:02 – Speed in Responding To Side Effects Is the Issue Not the Side Effects Claim The Media


FT Article: –

24:39 – MHRA “partners” with the BMGF and the WHO


MHRA Statement: –

26:59 – More Variants of Concern


EuroNews Article: –

29:30 – Vaccine Roll Out Not Proceeding As Planned Due To “Hesitancy.”


LS Article: –

Mail Article: –

31:39 – Oral Health And Face Masks


Colgate: –

LL Article: –

TS Article: –

OT Article: –

37:09 – Northern Exposure Interview With A Storm Strooper – Post Match Analysis –

38:52 – Email From Viewer Reports Identical Side Effects

40:15 – Media Slaps the Anti-Vaxxer label on NHS Staff


Star Article: –

Times Article: –

Mail Article: –

46:19 – Playing Party Politics With The Truth By Selecting Which Lies To Criticise


Peter Stevanovic Tweet: –

Guardian Article: –

50:22 – Economic Suicide And Housing Bubbles


Government Backed Mortgages: –

53:26 – Fintech Gets Even Greener As Digital Currency Is Planned To Replace The Pound


Fintech Statement: –

Foreign Affairs Committee Statement:

Report: –

57:44 – Has Anyone Researched the Economic Case for Scottish Independence?


Ciaran Jenkins Tweet: –

59:56 – Living In The Private Security UK State

01:05:43 – Increasing Tensions Over The Ukraine


Times Article: –

BBC Article: –

01:11:27 – Culture Wars and Humanity 2.0


John Waters Article: –

Kate Shemerani: from the UK interview

UK Nurses Alliance

It is with a heavy heart, I am letting you know, a two year old child has died from the Pfizer Covid vaccine. A little girl. There are no words. Wake up people. This has to stop.

Related A study from Stanford University is at this site. They have concluded Masks are dangerous.

Do check out that study for sure.

Masks are just not a good thing They can make you sick

Recent posts

The first link is the Canadian perspective and how Doctors are being censored and demonized. That is happening world wide unfortunately.

There is also a link to a wealth of information about lockdowns etc. Lots of information everyone needs to know. Censorship needs to be stopped. Doctors and nurses should not be afraid to speak out.

Medical Censorship and The Harms of Lockdowns

Massive Child Sex Ring Busted at State Youth Facility in New Hampshire

European Court system is compromised

Rebuttal Letter to European Medicines Agency (EMA) from Doctors for COVID Ethics

SPARS 2025-2028 Should be SARS 2019-2023 They moved the timeline is all

Published in: on April 20, 2021 at 5:08 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

Medical Censorship and The Harms of Lockdowns

An Exclusive Interview of Three Frontline Canadian Physicians “Freedom of expression is enshrined in our Constitution, and is imperative in a free and democratic society, as it underpins other human rights, such as the freedoms of thought, conscience, association and assembly. Free expression is vital to robust and open debate in order to formulate sound and reasoned public policy. This video reveals the disturbing, and dangerous, trend of how peaceful voices of frontline physicians who dissent, and disagree, with state policy regarding COVID directives, are being silenced. Dr. Gill, Dr. Phillips and Dr. Lamba have all come under attack for their expression that public health directives and mandates are grossly flawed and misguided, and for calling attention to the incredible harms of the governments’ forced lockdowns. Their desire to speak about the research they know, and the harms they witness, is driven by their conscience. Their only purpose in doing so is to live up to their oath to “first, do no harm”. They have no other motive. They stand to gain no profit, and in fact, to lose everything. Settle in and listen with an open mind and heart.”

Medical Censorship & Harms of Lockdowns 

(Sources) There is a wealth of information. I think we all should read up on all of this. You can also download it and I would do that. Like everything else it could vanish.

This has been updated recently. There is a link to a study from Stanford. They conclude that masks are dangerous.

Masks are just not a good thing They can make you sick

Evidence Covid Virus does not exist

The many Dangers of Lockdowns

Deaths caused by Lockdowns

Deaths and Injuries due to Covid vaccines Page 2

There are more Canadian doctors speaking out and a few other assorted things.

We Are the Resistance and We Will WIN this War

Irish Doctor Suspended for Refusing to Vaccinate Patients With Experimental COVID Jab

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

Published in: on April 20, 2021 at 6:24 am  Leave a Comment  

Massive Child Sex Ring Busted at State Youth Facility in New Hampshire

Well this took way to long to get to the bottom of.

Concord, NH — According to a recent investigation by the state of New Hampshire’s attorney general’s office, a state-run youth detention center has been ground zero for an utterly horrifying child torture and sex abuse ring spanning the course of decades.

According to officials and a recent lawsuit, hundreds of victims have come forward alleging the abuse by over 100 government employees, and multiple arrests have been made.

The abuse took place at the Sununu Youth Services Center, formerly known as the Youth Development Center.

In 2019, the taxpayer funded center became the subject of an investigation after two staffers were arrested. The two former staffers were charged with 82 counts of child rape.

According to investigators, however, those charges were all temporarily dropped in order to expand the investigation.

Now, two years later, the original two staffers have been re-arrested as well as six others for their roles in the child rape and torture ring which spanned decades

Though, according to the AP, the attorney general’s office didn’t comment on the possibility of further arrests, they did announce that this was “merely a step forward” and that the investigation will continue — implying that there are many more abusers to go after.

“Today’s arrests make clear that this administration is committed to holding these perpetrators accountable for their detestable actions,” said Gov. Chris Sununu — the facility’s namesake.

“This is not over, and we will continue to investigate these horrific allegations.”

According to the Associated Press:

The new arrestees include Lucien Poulette, 65, of Auburn, who is charged with 33 counts — including rape and sexual assault — involving seven victims between 1994 and 2005.

Bradley Asbury, 66, of Dunbarton, is charged with being an accomplice to the rape of a former resident between 1997 and 1998. And Frank Davis, 79, of Hopkinton, is charged with one count of rape and five counts of sexual assault involving two victims between 1996 and 1997.

Instead of the dozens of charges they previously faced, Jeffrey Buskey, 54, of Quincy, Massachusetts, is now charged with five counts of rape involving four children between 1996 and 1999, while Stephen Murphy, 51, of Danvers, Massachusetts, is charged with five counts of rape involving three children between 1997 and 1999.

James Woodlock, 56, of Manchester, was charged with three counts of being an accomplice to rape between 1997 and 1998.

David Meehan, the lead plaintiff in the civil lawsuit, alleges that Woodlock repeatedly beat him, held him down while Buskey raped him and told him he had “simply misunderstood events” when he spoke up during a group counseling session.

In a worrisome move, after the original investigation was launched, Woodlock left the facility and became a probation officer — for children. However, he was fired this week from his position after his arrest was made public.

On top of the arrests this week, several of the alleged child rapists who were arrested have also been named in a lawsuit in which more than 200 men and women allege they were physically or sexually abused as children by 150 staffers at the Manchester facility from 1963 to 2018.

200 men and women allege they were physically or sexually abused as children by 150 staffers at the Manchester facility from 1963 to 2018.

According to the lawsuit, the facility was a “magnet for predators.”

According to the lead attorney, Rus Rilee, children were gang raped by counselors, beaten while being raped and forced to sexually abuse each other, he said. Some ended up with sexually transmitted diseases; one ended up pregnant.

“Staff members choked children, beat them unconscious, burned them with cigarettes and broke their bones, Rilee said. Counselors set up ‘fight clubs’ and forced kids to compete for food.

“Children were locked in solitary confinement for weeks or months, sometimes shackled or strapped naked to their beds. Kept away from classrooms while their injuries healed, some can’t read or write today,” he said, according to the AP.

“These broken, shattered children were then unleashed into society with no education, no life skills and no ability to meaningfully function,” said Rilee.

Despite reassurances from the state Division for Children, Youth and Families claiming their mission is to protect children, the child rape and torture was systemic, according to the lawsuit.

“The systemic, governmental child abuse that occurred was allowed to occur because there wasn’t sufficient oversight, and the state was institutionally negligent in their hiring, training, supervision and retention polices,” Rilee said.

“It’s pretty clear to me that this facility was a magnet for predators.”

Source: Source

Seems the courts might be compromised. Another dirty Judge. Milwaukee County Judge Brett Blomme arrested on tentative child pornography charges. You got to go read that story. Could it be that pedophiles are now pretending to be transgender. They can now go into girls sports and girls washrooms. Now that is a dream come true for pedophiles, that loves little girls as someone said. Also a great place to hide in plain sight. Catch a guy in the girls washroom and all they have to say is “I am transgender”. Seems it is open season on little girls.

Children’s Court Judge and Former Head of Group That Sponsors ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ Arrested on Child Pornography Charges


Recent Posts

European Court system is compromised

SPARS 2025-2028 Should be SARS 2019-2023 They moved the timeline is all

Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’

Irish Doctor Suspended for Refusing to Vaccinate Patients With Experimental COVID Jab

Prolonged lockdown can compromise a child’s immune system, according to immunologist

Published in: on April 11, 2021 at 2:59 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

European Court system is compromised

When any court system is compromised or has a conflict of interest the court is useless. When the judges suffer from a conflict of interest they should be removed.

This is an older post from about thirteen months ago but still applies and is also a petition. Not sure if the petition is still active. The information they present is disturbing to say the least. That is still alive and well.

Judges & NGO: Conflicts of interest

When we looked more closely at the background of the judges of the European Court of Human Rights, we never imagined the troubling discoveries we would make.

After a 6 month investigation, we are releasing an important REPORT (appendices available here) outlining the extent of the relationship between NGOs and ECHR judges, and the resulting problems and conflicts of interest.

We have identified seven NGOs that are both active at the Court, and have judges among their former staff. At least 22 of the 100 judges who have served since 2009 are former staff or leaders of these seven NGOs.

Among these, the Open Society Network stands out for the number of judges linked to it (12) and for the fact that it actually funds the other six organisations identified in this report.

The powerful presence of the Open Society and its affiliates is problematic in many ways. But even more serious is the fact that 18 of the 22 judges were found to have served on cases initiated or supported by the organization with which they were previously associated.

We have identified 88 problematic cases over the last 10 years. In only 12 cases have judges abstained from sitting because of their connection with an NGO involved.
And this is a low assessment that does not even take into account the close financial links between NGOs. For example, we did not identify all cases involving other NGOs funded by the Open Society Foundation, nor did we identify all cases in which a judge from an NGO funded by OSF ruled in cases in which that foundation acted.

This situation is serious, and calls into question the independence of the Court and the impartiality of the judges. These conflicts must be remedied immediately. 

Our report makes proposals to that end. In particular, greater attention should be paid to the choice of candidates for the post of judge by avoiding the appointment of activists and campaigners. The report also makes proposals to ensure transparency of interests and links between applicants, judges and NGOs, and to formalise the procedures for deportation and disqualification.

Read the full REPORT: “NGOs and Judges of the ECHR 2009 – 2019”. The appendices are available here.

Conscious of the value of the human rights protection system in Europe, the ECLJ hopes that this report will be received as a positive contribution to the better functioning of the Court.

As a follow-up to this report, the ECLJ has decided to formally refer the matter to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in accordance with Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure, which provides for an effective petitions procedure. We invite you to join our petition. 

This Assembly is in charge of the election of judges, has a power of investigation and can make recommendations to the representatives of the 47 States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights, to whom we have also addressed this report.

We need your support to protect the independence of the European Court and the impartiality of its judges. Go HERE to sign.

They have other stories everyone might want to take a look at.

For those of you in the EU I advise looking at the reports.

European court rules compulsory vaccinations for children as legal and ‘necessary’

THE European Court of Human Rights has ruled that compulsory vaccinations are legal and may be necessary in democratic countries to end the coronavirus pandemic.

Thousands have died from the vaccines and many more have been injured by them

The masks are toxic and do great harm

Time to stop all the madness. Why are they killing and injuring people on purpose?

Here is a bit of history to reflect on. They just love experimenting on people. This is the tip of a massive iceberg. The experimenting on people has been ongoing for as long as I can remember. Even way before MK Ultra came a long. One of their favorite groups to experiment on are soldiers. Do what your told and an never question anything is their motto. The experimental covid vaccines are not a new thing, they are using to turn everyone into a lab rat. The vac cine garbage started way back in the days of small pox and they did not go so well back then either. Go on a scavenger hunt to find out about all the experiments on innocent victims, you will be shocked at what you find. When you find good stuff, do put them in the comment section. I just do not have time to go back and hunt them all down. Over the years I have read many reports on experiments. Experimenting people is wrong on any level and many of those experiments they did, were done without peoples knowledge. All the radiation ones come to mind. The Ring Worm kids. That one was to find our how X Rays at high levels would damage the kids. The US paid for the Radiation Experiment.

July 9, 2017

Radiation and ringworm: a tale of social policy, racism, and health care

August 16, 2009

Part 1: H1N1 weapon of mass destruction vaccine and human experimentation

The Globalists’ Solution to Plandemic: A New Treaty That Essentially Creates a World Government (NWO) from April 7,2021

Rebuttal Letter to European Medicines Agency (EMA) from Doctors for COVID Ethics

April 9, 2021

From Doctors for Covid Ethics

Emer Cooke, Executive Director, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

April 1st, 2021

Ladies and Gentlemen,


We acknowledge receipt of your March 23 reply to our letter dated February 28, seeking reassurance that foreseeable risks of gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines” had been ruled out in animal trials prior to human use. Our concerns arise from multiple lines of evidence, including that the SARS-CoV-2 “spike protein” is not a passive docking protein, but its production is likely to initiate blood coagulation via multiple mechanisms.

Regrettably, your reply of March 23 is unconvincing and unacceptable. We are dismayed that you choose to respond to our request for crucially important information in a dismissive and unscientific manner. Such a cavalier approach to vaccine safety creates the unwelcome impression that the EMA is serving the interests of the very pharmaceutical companies whose products it is your pledged duty to evaluate. The evidence is clear that there are some serious adverse event risks & that a number of people, not at risk from SARS-CoV-2, have died following vaccination.

1. You concede that the “vaccines”, which are more accurately described as investigational gene-based agents, enter the bloodstream but you can obviously provide no quantitative data. In the absence of the latter, any scientific assessment you purport to have undertaken lacks foundation.

2. Your statement that non-clinical studies do not indicate any detectable uptake of the vaccines into endothelial cells lacks credibility. We demand to see the scientific evidence. If not available, it must be assumed that endothelial cells are targeted.

3. Auto-attack could not have been excluded in animals unless they had been immunologically primed beforehand. We demand evidence that such experiments had been performed. Similar experiments have been undertaken before with previous, unsuccessful candidate vaccines, and fatal, antibody-dependent enhancement of disease was observed.

4. We requested scientific evidence, not a vague description of what was purportedly seen in non-valid animal experiments. Your cursory mention of laboratory findings in humans is cynical. In view of the plausible connection between production of spike protein and the emergence of thromboembolic serious adverse events (SAEs), we demand to see the results of D-dimer determinations. As you are aware, D-dimer is a very good test as an aid to diagnose thrombosis.

After delivery of our letter to you on March 1, events followed that debunk your response to our last three queries to an extent that can only be termed embarrassing. As we feared, severe and fatal coagulopathies occurred in young individuals following “vaccination”, leading 15 countries to suspend their AZ-“vaccination” program. An official investigation by the EMA into the cases of afflicted younger individuals followed, the results of which were announced by the WHO on March 17, 2021, stating: “At this time, WHO considers that the benefits of the AstraZeneca vaccine outweigh its risks and recommends that vaccinations continue.”

What was this decision based upon? The WHO is not a competent body for formally evaluating drug safety. That is explicitly the role of the agency you lead.

In your press release, you disclosed the following information to support your conclusion. You had scrutinized data on two mortally dangerous conditions that had followed within 14 days of “vaccination”: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; and CSVT, cerebral sinus vein thrombosis. 5 DIC and 18 CSVT were on record, with a total death toll of 9. Most cases were <55 year-old individuals. 5 DIC and 12 CSVT were under 50 years of age. None were reported as having had serious pre-existing illness.

You stated numbers that “normally” would be expected : DIC <1, CSVT 1.3.

Consequently, for these very rare conditions, a link to vaccination could not entirely be dismissed. However, given that 20 million individuals had been “vaccinated”, the benefits were deemed to far outweigh the risks.

But in fact, your Press Release rendered it glaringly apparent that the AZ-“vaccine” does have the potential to trigger intravascular coagulation, that the true risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits, and that any authority with the slightest sense of responsibility must suspend its further use.

1. Regard your incidence numbers for <50 year old individuals in the “vaccinated” versus “normal” population:

CSVT : 12 versus 1.3.

A 9-fold increase is beyond the range of coincidence.Video: Doctors and Scientists Write to European Medicines Agency (EMA) Warning of COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers

DIC : 5 versus <1.

As we hope you know, DIC neveroccurs out of the blue in healthy individuals. The incidence should not be stated as <1 when in reality it is ZERO.


2. Assume that 10 million recipients of the “vaccine” were < 60 yrs and this was followed by 9 deaths due to DIC and SVCT. The death toll upon 60 million “vaccinations” would be extrapolatable to 54.

The pandemic hit around 60 million individuals < 60 yrs in Germany.

During the first 6 months it reportedly claimed 52 lives of individuals without pre-existing illness (See this)

Because of the unreliability of PCR testing and because of the completely novel way that deaths ‘with covid19’ are determined, the value of 52 is an over-estimate of the real burden of disease, further weakening your already-inadequate claim for risk-benefit.

How, then, can you declare that the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks? We demand your reply supported by facts and figures that we will convey to the public.

3. Further considerations expose the truly frightful dimensions of your irresponsible assertion.

CSVT, cerebral venous thrombosis, is always a life-threatening condition that demands immediate medical attention. The number of cases you conceded had occurred can represent just the tip of a huge iceberg. As you must know, the most common symptoms of CSVT are piercing headache, blurred vision, nausea and vomiting. In severe cases, stroke-like symptoms occur including impairment of speech, vision and hearing, body numbness, weakness , decreased alertness and loss of motoric control.

Surely, you are not oblivious to the fact that countless individuals suffered from precisely such symptoms directly following “vaccinations” with all the experimental gene-based agents.

Clot formation in deep leg veins can lead to lethal pulmonary embolisms. Surely you must know that peripheral venous thromboses have repeatedly been reported following “vaccinations” with all the experimental gene-based agents

Microthromboses in the lung vasculature can lead to misdiagnosis of pneumonia. In combination with false-positive PCR (with high cycle thresholds), these will then be registered as COVID 19 cases. Surely you must know that this scenario has probably repeatedly taken place following “vaccinations” with all the experimental gene- based agents.

In all events, extensive thrombi formation can lead to consumption of platelets and coagulation factors, resulting in hemorrhagic diathesis and bleeding at all possible locations. Surely you must know that profuse skin bleedings have repeatedly been observed following “vaccinations” with all the experimental gene-based agents.

Given that there is a mechanistically plausible explanation for these thromboembolic adverse drug reactions (TE ADRs), namely that the gene-based products induce human cells to manufacture potentially pro-thrombotic spike protein, the reasoned & responsible assumption must now be that this may be a class effect. In other words, the dangers must be ruled out for all emergency-authorised gene-based vaccines, not merely the AZ product.

We urge you to adopt this stance unless and until there is data providing high clinical confidence to the contrary. We are very willing to liaise with the Agency in order to help craft a focussed pharmacovigilance plan to accomplish this goal. With the above in mind, we hope you are aware that all thrombotic events can be rapidly diagnosed by measurement of D-Dimers in blood. And that good medical practice imperatively demands that attempts are undertaken to diagnose CSVT in any and every patient, young or old, presenting with the typical signs and symptoms following “vaccination”.

Given the potential for adverse effects, potentially fatal ones, it is completely inappropriate and unacceptable that EMA permits these products, which hold only emergency use authorisations, to be administered to younger (<60y) people who are healthy, as they are at unmeasurable risks from SARS-CoV-2.

Not to make this explicit is, in our view, a reckless stance to have taken in the first place and doubly so now.

Of equal importance, you are bound by duty to investigate whether reasons exist for the waves of deaths that have occurred following “vaccination” of elderly residents in care and senior homes. Or are you asserting that dangers of “vaccine”-derived thrombotic events are limited to younger individuals? If not, restricting their use solely in one age group — as decided upon in Germany — equates with nothing less than monstrous, condoned genocide of the other.

In closing, failure to inform “vaccine” recipients of the risks and negligible benefits outlined here represents serious violations of medical ethics and citizens’ medical rights. Those violations are especially grave as all the risks we describe can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination, and each intervening coronavirus exposure. This renders both repeated vaccination and common coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom — in the absence of “vaccination” — COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.

Such is the real risk-benefit analysis of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. Either the EMA lacks the subject-matter expertise to appreciate the molecular science of this reality, or it lacks the medical ethics to act accordingly.

At best, we regard the EMA’s complacent stance on vaccine dangers to be symptomatic of the fact that, under the prevailing politico-medical response to COVID-19, medical ethics has migrated from the consulting room to a geopolitical stage. Faced with a medical problem, mass-medical intervention has seen the practice of medicine taken from doctors’ hands.In this politicized context, corporate and political actors may consider themselves free from ethical constraints, operating unbound by a medical code of ethics, unlike medical doctors. All actors, however, are bound by the Nuremberg Code.

The Nuremberg Code prohibits human experimentation of the very kind being endorsed and defended by the EMA. Even under the terms of their own original FDA authorization, COVID-19 vaccines are deemed “investigational” and their recipients “human subjects”, who are, by definition, entitled to informed consent. See this.

Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines”, or coercing them through “vaccine passports”, constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code mandates voluntary informed consent “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit [or] duress”. See this.

In other words, citizens have the right under the Nuremberg Code and related protections not to be subject involuntarily to medical experiments. It is clear that these experimental agents should be CONTRA-INDICATED in individuals not at elevated risk of serious illness & death if infected by SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, the use of the experimental agents must also be withheld in the elderly population until a risk-benefit assessment has been properly conducted. In any event, the vaccine label must be revised to reflect the recently emerged serious adverse events addressed here.

We remind the EMA that Nuremberg violations constitute crimes against humanity under the Geneva Convention. Crimes against humanity are deemed “the worst atrocities known to mankind”, and are prosecuted under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. See this.

Given the hundreds of millions and eventually billions of people who may be coerced into accepting these agents, the EMA, in persistently shrinking from open debate and the truth, will be seen by lawyers and historians as having actively assisted in crimes against humanity, with the full weight of the implications to all involved. We demand thatyou engage openly with us to ensure that the public have an objective understanding of the clinical risk profile of these gene-based interventions.

You understand that coercive pressure is being placed on citizens to receive COVID-19 vaccines, which are experimental medical treatments. Your responsibility to those citizens includes ensuring that they are informed of the adverse event risks of every such treatment. To date you have failed to do so, and have instead misled the public on the reality of the “vaccines’” risk-benefit profile.

If you continue to conceal the truth, efforts will be made to bring this to light and to see that justice is done. For the sake of the injured and the dead, and to protect further lives from similar fates.


For the avoidance of doubt, if your regulatory body does not immediately suspend its “emergency” recommendation of potentially dangerous inadequately tested gene-based “vaccines”, while the matters which we have highlighted to you are properly investigated, we hereby put the European Medicines Agency on notice of being complicit in medical experimentation, in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which thereby constitutes the commission of crimes against humanity.

Furthermore, it is your indirigible duty as a regulatory body to ensure that all doctors worldwide are advised that they are taking part in medical experimentation via “vaccination” programmes, whether wittingly or unwittingly, with all the legal and ethical obligations that such involvement entails.

This email is copied to the lawyer Reiner Fuellmich. It is also copied to Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe, and to Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission.

Yours faithfully,

Doctors for Covid Ethics Source

Face masks are Toxic

SPARS 2025-2028 Plan – Should be SARS 2019-2023 They moved the timeline is all

Death from vaccines are still climbing as are the injuries

Government in Israel Sharing Personal Information on Unvaccinated People

The Coronavirus Vaccine: The Real Danger is “Agenda ID2020”. Vaccination as a Platform for “Digital Identity” What is the infamous ID2020? It is an alliance of public-private partners, including UN agencies and civil society. It’s an electronic ID program that uses generalized vaccination as a platform for digital identity.

China did not Isolate the virus NBC news Jan 23, 2021 Neither has anyone else

Petition to the Government of Canada


  • Section 6 of the Charter of Rights and Freedom says Canadians have the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada;
  • Section 2a of the Charter of Rights and Freedom says Canadians have freedom of conscience and religion;
  • Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedom says Canadians are not allowed to be discriminated against based on, for example, mental or physical ability (health);
  • COVID-19 passports are being spoken of as the way to revive the travel industry but they stand to put the final nail in the coffin of the travel industry;
  • Canadians have the right to informed choice when it comes to vaccines and other medical treatments, they cannot be forced or coerced;
  • COVID-19 passports could be used to restrict the rights of people who have refused a COVID-19 vaccine, which would be unacceptable and create a society of have and have-nots, and the gap between those groups has only grown thanks to COVID-19, and we stand at the precipice of the gap getting larger still;
  • This is not a partisan issue, it affects Canadians of all stripes and for various personal reasons, and therefore should not be treated as such; and
  • Canadians want their freedom of movement and right to privacy of their personal health data to be positively affirmed by the government.

We, the undersigned, citizens of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to commit to not rolling out any e-vaccination status/immunity passport to the Canadian public for travel, work, public events or otherwise. Go here to sign

Nanofibers could cause mesothelioma; Researchers

Registered Canadian charity now helping Fight The Fines — charity receipts available!

Published in: on April 9, 2021 at 11:54 pm  Leave a Comment  

SPARS 2025-2028 Plan – Should be SARS 2019-2023 They moved the timeline is all

Info wars is right on the money. They are talking about a plan the same as what is happening now. Like Event 201, this is also the same for the most part.

This was written up in 2017. They sure do plan ahead I must say, I will be adding the link to the document after the video.

EMERGENCY SATURDAY BROADCAST: World Shocked By SPARS 2025-2028 Document

If you take the p out of SPARS you have SARS go figure.

We all need to read a good book every now and then. This one is very enlightening. Happy reading. Even Stephen King would think this was a nightmare.

I advise downloading the document just in case they find a way to remove it from the internet.

European Plans For ‘Vaccine Passports’ Were In Place 20 Months Prior To The Pandemic. Coincidence?

Thousands have died from the vaccines and thousands have been injured by them

Scientists have found Toxic Chemicals in Masks. In Canada they had yet another recall of masks, they too are toxic

Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’

Irish Doctor Suspended for Refusing to Vaccinate Patients With Experimental COVID Jab

Prolonged lockdown can compromise a child’s immune system, according to immunologist

Expert that worked for Bill Gates Warns of Coming Covid Vaccine Disaster

Employment Standards Act in Ontario Says You Can Now Be LAID OFF WITHOUT PAY FOR NOT BEING VACCINATED

Published in: on April 8, 2021 at 1:11 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’

March 25, 2021

Exclusive: Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’

by Mordechai Sones

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the worlds population.

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else.
Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

AFLDS: The Israel Supreme Court decision last week cancelling COVID flight restrictions said: “In the future, any new restrictions on travel into or out of Israel need, in legal terms, a comprehensive, factual, data-based foundation.”

In a talk you gave four months ago, you said

“The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.

“The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; it’s cross immunity.

“So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.

In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

Yeadon: “What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2.
The study is from one of the best labs in their field.

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not “high throughput” and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K.

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune.

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus.

For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death. So how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated.

Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die.

Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who haven’t already had COVID-19?

Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case?

And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity”, would that then not protect from any super-variant?

“I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.

“As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous.

“No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.

“It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to “escape immunity”.

“Not only is it intrinsically unlikely – because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant – but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research.

“The research I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants.

This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant.

“I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE. I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural experiments’, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines.

“The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right).

“The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.”

Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection?

“Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA.
Always good quality interactions.

“Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.

“So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest.

“The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine.

“You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmich’s “Corona Committee” online.

“So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless.

“Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us.

“Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots.

“I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator.

“I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us.

“PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.

“As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes.

“For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the worlds population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.

“It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”


92 Year Old Holocaust Survivor (WARNS of FASCISM/NAZISM)

New Update on a Toxic Mask Recall. A few million could end up with long term problems. Children included.

Updated March 29, 2021

Thousands had side effects from Covid Vaccine- Deaths and Injuries

Irish Doctor Suspended for Refusing to Vaccinate Patients With Experimental COVID Jab

Eugen Schwab is the father of Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum. The apple never falls to far from the tree.

Now this is a very interesting read. Here is just one quote from the story. Klaus has an interesting history. I think people need to know.

  AT the Escher-Wyss factory in Ravensburg, Eugen Schwab had been busy putting forced labourers to work at his model Nazi company. During the years of World War II, nearly 3,600 forced labourers worked in Ravensburg, including at Escher Wyss. Dear old daddy used slaves. Source

GAVI Vaccine Alliance is the Source of Terror Behind Global Lockdowns and Vaccine Coercion


Published in: on March 31, 2021 at 3:54 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , ,

Irish Doctor Suspended for Refusing to Vaccinate Patients With Experimental COVID Jab

An Irish GP who describes himself as a ‘conscientious objector’ has been suspended by the country’s medical licensing body for refusing to vaccinate his patients with the new experimental COVID-19 jab.

Dr. Waters told The Irish Times, “My problem primarily is that I don’t think the pathogenicity of Covid is sufficiently severe to A) cause lockdowns or B) use a messenger RNA [vaccine],” expressing concern his over the unproven safety record of the new vaccines.

The government agency is threatening to target any doctor which they deem to be spreading ‘misinformation’ or not following the government’s ever-changing and arbitrary guidelines relating to the ‘global pandemic’ or its mass vaccination campaign.

Irish Post reports…

Last month, we reported on Kildare GP Dr Gerard Waters of the Whitehorn Clinic in Celbridge, who faced backlash after admitting he would not be vaccinating his patients and also does not refer anyone for Covid-19 tests even if they are exhibiting symptoms.

Speaking on RTÉ’s Liveline in February, Dr Waters said he was a ‘conscientious objector’ and said he disagreed with how quickly the vaccines had been developed and how it had been handled by authorities.

He went on to say that he would have no issue if his patients went on to receive the vaccine from somewhere else, but he would not put anything in his patient’s arms that he would not put in his own.

Now Dr Waters has been suspended by the Medical Council after they made an application to the High Court under the Medical Practitioners Act 2007, The Irish Times reports.

Source: 21st Century Wire

Considering the Nuremberg Code, the Doctor did the right thing. Then there is the fact the vaccines are experimental and have killed thousands and injured thousands more.

URGENT: Digital Green Certificate Regulation
Tracey O’ Mahony Barrister at Law asking for help. If you know anyone in Ireland please send them this

Link to draft legislation:

Link to Google Drive with draft letter to MEP and MEP contact list:

Covid-19 Laws: Ridiculing the Disabled

Tracy’s Youtube channel

UK Government Public Consultation on Covid-19 Status Certification/passports – Call to Action by 29th March

Thousands had side effects from Covid Vaccine- Deaths and Injuries

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Prolonged lockdown can compromise a child’s immune system, according to immunologist

Expert that worked for Bill Gates Warns of Coming Covid Vaccine Disaster

Canadian Doctors Speak Out and Child being taken from a Parent

PCR Swab sterilized with Cancer causing agent

Universities, Government and
Media prepare for psychological war on all of us

Mom Has Her Child Removed From Her Custody For Not Masking! Also information on Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.

Published in: on March 29, 2021 at 3:12 am  Comments (2)  
Tags: ,


It’s been a very strange few weeks, well if it could possibly get any stranger than it already is.

On the 16th February I uploaded a 30 minute video onto my YouTube channel, titled “Vaccination and Vacation or Sceptical Staycation?” The video accompanied an article which I have also published in print.

The video was taken down within 3 hours of being uploaded, it had been viewed by 4 people (yes a whopping 4 people) and bearing in mind the channel is less than 4 weeks old and has less than 10 subscribers! Someone was incredibly upset with the content I had produced but neglected to give me a reason for censoring it.

I subsequently found myself banned for the second time on YouTube, the previous ban was for re uploading a speech which I gave in Sheffield last summer that had reached 67.5k views on another channel before…

View original post 2,761 more words

Published in: on March 24, 2021 at 2:52 pm  Comments (1)  


Chris Elston held a sign that said “children cannot consent to puberty blockers” and for that he was attacked and eventually arrested. Puberty blockers being used on young children should be seen as child abuse yet in Montreal antifa thugs felt that his free speech needed to be stopped with violence. Meanwhile in Vancouver the Vancouver police department once again failed to do their job by arresting the wrong person in an assault incident similar to what happened to Dan Dicks last July. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with Chris Elston about his signs, the attacks he’s been getting and why he continues with his campaign to raiser awareness about the use of puberty blockers in children.

JUST IN: Ted Cruz goes on EPIC TIRADE against Equality Act

Rand Paul questions Dr. Rachel Levine on puberty blockers for minors with gender dysphoria

Feb 25, 2021

Dr. Rachel Levine was a man once upon a time. Of course he was older, when he decided to become a woman. Born in 1957.named Richard Levine has two children, He/She transitioned in 2011. Levine and her ex-wife, divorced in 2013. Rachel certainly was not a child being coerced or other wise persuaded to become a woman at a young age. He/She was 54 give or take. Had the transition taken place at a younger age like little kid or teen years, there would probably be no children, unless through adoption. Take blockers and no children.

This is one of the drugs used Lupron

By Jim Strickland Sheila Schutt

A Georgia woman blames a controversial drug for ruining her life and the lives of thousands of other women. Her federal lawsuit claims several pharmaceutical companies failed to warn her and others about crippling side effects.

The drug Lupron was originally approved for prostate cancer, but for the last 20 years women have taken it to relieve pelvic pain. Terry Paulsen’s case alleging negligence and product liability is being watched closely by patients both male and female who now consider themselves Lupron victims.

Paulsen lives in Lexington, Ga., east of Athens. She is not yet 60, but she looks closer to 80.

“My body is on fire,” Paulsen told Channel 2 Action News. “My joints have arthritis everywhere.”

In another life, Paulsen was a neo-natal emergency nurse and avid equestrian. For her interview with Channel 2, Paulsen needed a recliner. She has endured multiple surgeries, mysterious rashes and constant pain over a 14-year period.

“Since I got Lupron in 2004, we did not know this was coming,” said Paulsen.

Lupron is an injection. It stops the production of sex hormones. Paulsen had only two shots to treat her endometriosis, painful lesions of uterine-like tissue that feed on estrogen.

“And this drug needs to have a black box warning on it, because I know what it did to me,” said Paulsen.

At the time, the Lupron label cautioned about “…a loss in bone density. But for a period of up to six months, this bone loss should not be clinically significant.” The current label drops that claim.

“Her immune system began to attack her own bones. She got osteopenia and osteoporosis and now she’s got terrible osteoporosis,” said Dr. Alan Levin, an immunologist with 50 years of experience, including consulting with the FDA, who is also Paulsen’s lawyer.

Levin said he believes thousands of others suffer similar symptoms.

Lupron users have filed nearly 24,000 reports of adverse reactions with the FDA; 60 percent of those were filed by women, Channel 2 found. The FDA deemed more than half of them serious cases.

“It feels like I have 80-year-old bones,” said 22-year-old Brooklyn Harbin. She’s one of the people who filed an adverse reaction report. She had been an active and athletic 10-year-old. But she began her period too early. A doctor prescribed Lupron for Harbin to halt early puberty.

“The back pain became very, very severe. It got very, very depressing having to be in a wheelchair in the fifth grade,” said Harbin.

“I feel that Lupron or any of the similar types of medications should never be used in someone under the age of 21,” said Dunwoody gynecologist Dr. Ken Sinervo. He specializes in endometriosis surgery. He told Channel 2 he’s seen many women suffering memory loss and joint pain.

Channel 2 emailed Lupron’s maker to ask why there is no warning on the box about memory loss or joint pain. The pharmaceutical company declined to go on camera but responded with a statement: “AbbVie regularly monitors and reports to appropriate regulatory agencies new safety information on an ongoing basis to ensure that our label contains accurate and up-to-date information to assist physicians and patients.”

Lupron lawyers convinced a federal judge to seal the results from several clinical trials, but not before an expert witness disclosed evidence that even after a year off the drug, 62 percent of women did not regain normal estrogen levels. AbbVie refused to comment on the studies or on Terry Paulsen.

“There is not a dime that can pay for what I have lost,” said Paulsen.

Jim Strickland is the consumer investigator at Channel 2 Action News. Sheila Schutt is an investigative producer at Channel 2. Source

That is just one drug. All drugs have side effects. Before taking any drug always check the side effects carefully. Just becase a doctor says they are safe, does not mean they are safe. Some doctors do not always tell the truth.

This says more about the drug.

Citing guidelines issued by the political advocacy group World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), these physicians admit that the effects of cross-sex hormones are generally irreversible. Vulnerable patients who agree to this treatment are thus crossing the Rubicon into permanent bodily impairment.

Why Puberty Blockers Are A Clear Danger To Children’s Health

Sex change regret silenced

Sexuality | One renowned surgeon says more study is needed of why some people ‘detransition’
by Kiley Crossland
Posted 10/06/17, 02:32 pm

As rates of sex change surgeries skyrocket, one of the world’s leading genital reconstruction surgeons is speaking out about an issue not being addressed: gender change regret.

In an interview with The Telegraph of London this week, professor Miroslav Djordjevic lamented the lack of research on transgender people changing their minds and undergoing surgery reversal.

Djordjevic, an acclaimed surgeon and researcher who performs about 100 sex change surgeries every year, recounted in the interview a discussion he had with U.K. graduate student James Caspian in 2014.

Djordjevic told Caspian he was seeing a growing number of patients who were expressing regret about their gender reassignment surgeries and wanted to “detransition.” Caspian decided to research the trend of sex change surgery regret for his master’s degree at Bath Spa University in Bath, England. But after preliminary research, the university rejected his proposal. Officials told him they were afraid of online criticism about a “politically incorrect” topic. Caspian submitted a complaint to the university and is awaiting a decision.

Djordjevic, who splits his time between New York’s Mount Sinai Hospital and his clinic in Belgrade, Serbia, told The Telegraph he was baffled by Bath Spa’s refusal.

“Definitely reversal surgery and regret in transgender persons is one of the very hot topics,” he said. “Generally, we have to support all research in this field.”

Djordjevic said he was first contacted by a patient wanting a reversal about five years ago. The number of reversal patients has continued to grow. Currently, he has two patients completing reversals and another six prospective patients. According to Djordjevic, some patients report crippling depression and suicidal ideation after their reassignment surgery. So far, all his reversal patients have been adult transgender people who want to restore their male genitalia.

Djordjevic said he fears one major problem is some clinics are just out for financial gain.

“I have heard stories of people visiting [clinics] who only checked if they had the money to pay,” he said. “We have to stop this.”

Another problem, according to Djordjevic, is growing pressure to treat patients at younger ages. In the last 20 years, the average age of his patients has dropped from 45 to 21. He does not do surgery on anyone younger than 18, but fears the World Professional Association for Transgender Health will soon reduce their guidelines for gender reassignment surgeries to include minors.

The rates of minors seeking treatment for gender dysphoria continue to rise.

In April, the only clinic in England that sees minors for gender identity development services reported that it saw 2,016 referrals in the previous 12 months, a 42 percent increase from the year before, on top of a 104 percent increase from the year before that. The number of children being treated for gender identity disorder at Scotland’s Sandyford Clinic in Glasgow quadrupled in the past three years, according to an article published this week in the Glasgow newspaper The Herald, from under 50 in 2013 to more than 200 cases last year.

Walt Heyer, a former transgender person who says his life was “devastated by gender transition” and has been writing about the increasing problem of gender change regret for 10 years, praised Djordjevic for speaking out: “The well-respected surgeon Dr. Miroslav Djordjevic and the psychotherapist James Caspian are discovering what I have known all along: regret and detransitions are on the rise because too many ‘gender affirming’ surgeries are performed on people who don’t need them.”  Source

You are not alone.

Up to 20% have regrets about their sex change. Sex change procedures are not effective, say researchers. Ten to 15 years after surgical reassignment, the suicide rate is 20 times that of comparable peers.

Here we reach out to those considering detransitioning. 

UK High Court Rules Puberty Blockers Experimental, Minors Cannot Consent

Legal, News, Research, Resources for Parents

by Andrè Van Mol, MD, CDMA’s The Point, December 23, 2020

In a stunning decision with international implications, the United Kingdom’s High Court ruled December 12 in Bell vs. Tavistock that puberty blockers (PB) and cross-sex hormone (CSH) use in gender dysphoric minors was experimental and should not, in most cases, be given to children under 16 without court order, adding that such petitioning was also advisable for 16 to 17 year olds.[1] They clarified that the consent issue was not about the breadth and depth of information the minors were given, but that “There is no age appropriate way to explain to many of these children what losing their fertility or full sexual function may mean to them in later years.”

This article is reprinted from CDMA’s The Point at

The full conclusion section of the High Court decision, paragraphs 133 to 153, is well worth reading, but I will focus on a few points therein. The High Court conclusion repeatedly emphasized (paragraphs 134, 143, 148, 151 and 152) the experimental nature of PB and CSH use due to the limited evidence for efficacy and safety. Though stipulating that a court order should usually be sought for PB use in gender dysphoric children under age 16, they advised that even for minors under age 16 to 17, “clinicians may well regard these as cases where the authorisation of the court should be sought prior to commencing the clinical treatment.”

The decision acknowledges that children have developing brains and simply cannot grasp the long-term results of transition (paragraph 141): “That adolescents find it difficult to contemplate or comprehend what their life will be like as adults and that they do not always consider the longer-term consequences of their actions is perhaps a statement of the obvious.” In the current ideological climate, stating the obvious is increasingly a necessity.

Striking a blow against the popular slogan that puberty blocking provides a “pause” or “wait and see” button “buying time” to allow gender dysphoric minors to reflect, the High Court found (paragraph 136), “The evidence shows that the vast majority of children who take PBs move on to take cross-sex hormones, that Stages 1 and 2 are two stages of one clinical pathway and once on that pathway it is extremely rare for a child to get off it.” They asserted (paragraph 137), “Indeed, the statistical correlation between the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones supports the case that it is appropriate to view PBs as a stepping stone to cross-sex hormones.” Quite right. The discontinuation rate for transition after initiating PBs is low: 1.4 percent per Wiepjes, et al.,[2] 1.9 percent per Brik, et al.,[3] 3.5 percent per Kuper, et al.[4] and 2 percent per Carmichael, et al.[5]

The legal challenge against the National Health Service’s Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, the only Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) for minors in the UK, was filed jointly by Sue Evans, a former GIDS nurse, along with the anonymous mother of a Tavistock patient[6]. Ms. Evans resigned from Tavistock over a decade prior due to her concerns that gender dysphoric youth were not receiving adequate psychological assessment and intervention. Keira Bell, a former GIDS patient and one of two case claimants (along with “MRS A,” mother of a 15-year-old autistic girl awaiting GIDS treatment), had stated to the BBC, “I should have been challenged on the proposals or the claims that I was making for myself.”[7] The BBC article states she received a year of PBs, then testosterone, and three years ago underwent mastectomy, much to her current regret.

There is ample background to the British Tavistock GIDS center controversy. In 2018, UK Equalities Minister Penny Mordaunt ordered an inquiry regarding why the number of girls seeking gender reassignment skyrocketed 4,000 percent in under a decade, citing figures of 40 such girls in 2009-2010 that ballooned to 1,806 in 2017-18.[8] Over a three-year period, 35 psychologists had resigned from Tavistock and Portman claiming excessive diagnosing of gender dysphoria in minors along with a rush to medicalize them.[9] Psychologists reported being prohibited from properly assessing patients for fear they would be labelled “transphobic.” Psychoanalyst Marcus Evans penned his account in “Why I Resigned from Tavistock: Trans-Identified Children Need Therapy, Not Just ‘Affirmation’ and Drugs.”[10]

The Royal College of General Practitioners issued a 2019 position statement, “The role of the GP in caring for gender-questioning and transgender patients,”[11] in which they noted, “There is a significant lack of robust, comprehensive evidence around the outcomes, side effects and unintended consequences of such treatments for people with gender dysphoria, particularly children and young people, which prevents GPs from helping patients and their families in making an informed decision.”

Editor in Chief of the BMJ Carl Heneghan wrote,[12] “There are significant problems with how the evidence for Gender-affirming cross sex hormone has been collected and analyzed that prevents definitive conclusions to be drawn.” He concluded, “The current evidence does not support informed decision making and safe practice in children.” Heneghan also cited a letter to Archives of Disease in Childhood insightfully titled “Use of puberty blockers for gender dysphoria: a momentous step in the dark.”[13]

Oxford Professor Michael Biggs reviewed the findings, including unpublished data, from what was at the time the only paper to have come out of the Tavistock and Portman GIDS’ puberty blocker trial for gender dysphoric teenagers.

[14] Professor Biggs found that, “after a year on GnRHa [puberty blockers] children reported greater self-harm, and that girls experienced more behavioral and emotional problems and expressed greater dissatisfaction with their body—so puberty blockers exacerbated gender dysphoria.”

Now the results of another Tavistock/GIDS study were reportedly accepted by a peer-reviewed journal on the same day as the High Court judgment. Titled “Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK,”[15] it took nine years to produce, yet it had only 44 participants, no control group and 43 of the 44 (98 percent) went on to cross-sex hormones. This is more evidence that puberty blockers are gateway drugs, a “stepping stone” to CSH, and that PB and CSH are “two stages of one clinical pathway,” as the High Court had written. The authors stated, “All had normal karyotype and endocrinology consistent with birth-registered sex,” supplying a reminder that disorders of sex development, aka intersex, and gender dysphoria are separate entities.

The study looked at intervals of 12, 24 and 36 months at bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC) and the total t-scores and self-harm indices of Child Behavioral Checklists (CBCL) and Youth Self-Reports (YSR). Results showed “As anticipated, pubertal suppression reduced growth that was dependent on puberty hormones, i.e. height and BMD.” Also, “There was no change from baseline in spine BMD at 12 months nor in hip BMD at 24 and 36 months, but at 24 months lumbar spine BMC and BMD were higher than at baseline.” This means “suppression of growth” and density precisely when the surge of a lifetime should have occurred. It is not an encouraging finding.

As for mental health assessment, “We found no evidence of change in psychological function with GnRHa treatment as indicated by parent report (CBCL) or self-report (YSR) of overall problems, internalising or externalising problems or self-harm.” Translation, puberty blockers did not help psychological distress or self-harm based on survey instruments from parents and patients both.

The British High Court has done a great service to gender dysphoric youth worldwide with the decision that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are indeed experimental, their long-term safety and efficacy are not established, PBs are a “stepping stone” to CSH, PBs and CSH hinder bone density and growth, they do not improve mental health and self-harm, and minors really don’t have the ability to provide truly informed consent to them.


[2] Wiepjes CM, Nota NM, de Blok CJM, et al. The Amsterdam cohort of gender dysphoria study (1972-2015): trends in prevalence, treatment, and regrets. J Sex Med. 2018;15(4):582–590

[3] Brik T, Vrouenraets LJJJ, de Vries MC, Hannema SE. Trajectories of

adolescents treated with gonadotropinreleasing hormone analogues for gender dysphoria [published online ahead of print March 9, 2020]. Arch Sex Behav. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01660-8

[4] Kuper LE, Stewart S, Preston S, Lau M, Lopez X. Body dissatisfaction and mental health outcomes of youth on gender-affirming hormone therapy. Pediatrics. 2020;145(4):e20193006

[5] Polly Carmichael, Gary Butler, et al.. Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK. medRxiv 2020.12.01.20241653; doi:

[6] Alison Holt. NHS use of puberty blockers legal challenge begins., 08 January 2020.

[7] Alison Holt. NHS gender clinic ‘should have challenged me more’ over transition., 01 March 2020.


[9] “NHS ‘over-diagnosing’ children having transgender treatment, former staff warn,”, 12 Dec. 2019.

[10] “Why I Resigned from Tavistock: Trans-Identified Children Need Therapy, Not Just ‘Affirmation’ and Drugs” by psychoanalyst Marcus Evans,, Jan. 17, 2020.

[11] , p.5

[12] Heneghan, Carl. “Gender-Affirming Hormone in Children and Adolescents.” BMJ EBM Spotlight, February 25, 2019,

[13] Richards C, Maxwell J, McCune N. Use of puberty blockers for gender dysphoria: a momentous step in the dark. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2019;104:611-612.

[14] Michael Biggs, “Tavistock’s Experimentation with Puberty Blockers: Scrutinizing the Evidence,”, March 5, 2019.

[15] Polly Carmichael, Gary Butler, Una Masic, Tim J Cole, Bianca L De Stavola, SarahDavidson, Elin M. Skageberg, Sophie Khadr, Russell Viner. Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK. medRxiv 2020.12.01.20241653; doi:

About Andrè Van Mol, MD

André Van Mol, MD is a board-certified family physician in private practice. He serves on the boards of Bethel Church of Redding and Moral Revolution (, and is the co-chair of the American College of Pediatrician’s Committee on Adolescent Sexuality. He speaks and writes on bioethics and Christian apologetics, and is experienced in short-term medical missions. Dr. Van Mol teaches a course on Bioethics for the Bethel School of Supernatural Ministry. He and his wife Evelyn —both former U.S. Naval officers—have two sons and two daughters, the latter of whom were among their nine foster children. Source

‘Transition’ Treatment Harms Kids, Veteran Psychiatrist at UK Gender Clinic Says

News, Research, Resources for Parents

Nicole Russell / February 09, 2021 / Daily Signal

Children “have been very seriously damaged” in receiving treatment at the United Kingdom’s premier gender identity facility, a former psychiatrist there says in a bombshell interview.

Dr. David Bell faced disciplinary action after writing an internal report in 2018 raising concerns about procedures at The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, which operates the U.K.’s sole “Gender Identity Development Service.”

After working with Tavistock and Portman for 24 years as a consultant psychiatrist, Bell recently retired. In the interview with London-based Channel 4 News, he speaks openly about his observations about giving children puberty blockers, treating every girl with a gender or sexual issue as “conversion therapy,” and politicizing support for transgender children.

Right away, Bell isn’t shy about relating the concerns of parents and others about Tavistock’s treatment plans. He tells reporter Cathy Newman:

I was a representative of the clinical and academic staff. The concerns that were brought to me were very, very serious. The main concerns were issues that had to do with … lack of consent. Many of the people who spoke to me did not think their children were able to consent to the treatment.

Then there were concerns of children being inappropriately pushed through to transition, where they had a lot of complex problems that really needed thinking about. The whole attitude of what’s called ‘affirmation’ instead of neutrality and inquiry caused considerable damage to the capacity of the service and clinicians to take on the full complexities of the cases they were dealing with. As a result, children have been very seriously damaged.

Newman asks the psychiatrist in the interview whether children are at risk while receiving treatments at Tavistock.

Bell replies: “They’re less at risk now because the puberty blockers have been stopped. The puberty blockers have been stopped because there is no evidence base for them at all. … By putting them on that pathway, it rather becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

In December, a panel of three judges on the High Court of Justice issued a landmark ruling restricting Tavistock from issuing puberty blockers to children under 16. The High Court is one of the U.K.’s three senior courts under its Supreme Court.

The judges made their decision in part because of the testimony of Keira Bell, who is known in the U.K. for speaking out against the use of puberty blockers, which Tavistock prescribed to her when she wanted to become a male.

Channel 4’s Newman asks Bell about the High Court ruling in that case regarding kids under 16.

The psychiatrist calls the decision “really important because it acts to protect them.”

Bell later says that the “positioning of these girls as only having a gender problem acts to prevent them from developing in a normal way and their own nonconforming gender identity or sexuality” and adds: “This is a form of conversion therapy among people that are gay or lesbian.”

Newman asks Bell whether he “might be on the wrong side of history” in failing to be as vocally supportive of the transgender movement as one might expect from someone who worked at a gender clinic for decades.

He appears to have no qualms about tying the gender debate to politics, saying later that “one of the things gone terribly wrong in the Tavistock and elsewhere is the invasion of the clinical domain by the political ideology.”

Bell articulates the very phenomenon that has grown in the United States as well:

This is a very highly politicized area. And leaders from movements with a very powerful ideological commitment have managed to capture policy both medically, professionally, in the media, and in government with no evidence basis, a purely highly politicized movement; we just have these consequences.

All I’m saying … is [the children] need to wait. There needs to be a thoughtful engagement with them as opposed to motoring them through to treatment pathways that have irreversible consequences for their bodies. We’re talking about not doing harm to children.

Bell is at his most compelling when he discusses a real-life example of someone who is struggling with her sexuality.

“Let me put it very simply. A girl of 12 may find that she is sexually attracted to other girls,” Bell says, adding:

It may go through her mind: … Maybe I’m not a girl. Maybe I’m a boy. If that happened 10-15 years ago, that would have been a passing phase and things would have moved on. But now because of hugely changed cultural context and the penetration of social media, such a girl may go online and she may easily come to the belief … that she is a boy. And that having reached that [conclusion] … there will be lots of forces around her that will support it, and all her other difficulties will be repositioned through that prism.

Although Bell says he doesn’t believe that Tavistock tried to push him toward retirement or “hound him out,” he says the facility made it clear “that people like me that spoke out will come under the scrutiny in this very negative way.”

“I think it’s like a message to everyone else who don’t have my seniority, my safety: Oh, my God, I better not speak out, they’ll think I’m transphobic.”

Bell’s comments during this interview confirm that the High Court made the right decision when it ruled that Tavistock must stop giving puberty blockers to children under 16.

The psychiatrist’s articulations about gender ideology as a political movement, whether in the U.K. or the United States, are spot on. He was courageous to speak out on an issue that has become so controversial in such a short time Source

Hundreds of trans people regret changing their gender, says trans activist

A trans activist woman who detransitioned in 2018 has sparked controversy by claiming that many people who have gender reassignment regret the decision and want to return to their original sex.

Charlie Evans, aged 28 years, from Newcastle, UK, says hundreds of people who want to return to their original gender have contacted her since she announced her detransition and stopped taking her hormone therapy.

Evans was born female but decided to live as a male for almost ten years before detransitioning. She says she has received a huge response since announcing that she would no longer be identifying as a male or taking her testosterone therapy. Hundreds of people – just 30 in the Newcastle area alone – have contacted her seeking help, she says, either asking her to speak out or to help them find support over their decision to detransition.

“I’m in communication with 19 and 20-year-olds who have had full gender reassignment surgery who wish they hadn’t, and their dysphoria hasn’t been relieved, they don’t feel better for it. They don’t know what their options are now.

Charlie Evans

There is a lack of information about how many people regret transitioning

The number of young people seeking gender transition is at the highest it has ever been, but little is reported about how many of them regret the decision later, finding they are unhappy with their new gender.

Evans, who made her story public last year, says she is shocked by the number of people who have contacted her saying they have found themselves in a similar position to her.

The people who contact her share similar characteristics:

“They tend to be around their mid-20s, they’re mostly female and mostly same-sex attracted, and often autistic as well.

Charlie Evans

“I felt I had to do something”

One 21-year-old woman who reached out to Evans said gender reassignment did not help her gender dysphoria and that she has therefore also detransitioned.

“She said she felt shunned by the LGBT community for being a traitor. So I felt I had to do something,” Evans said.

The woman had identified as male since the age of 13. After taking testosterone therapy, her voice deepened, she grew facial hair and her body started to change. She was due to undergo breast-removal surgery this summer, but started to change her mind in May and decided to stop taking her hormones and to identify as female again.

The woman, who asked to be called Ruby says:

“I didn’t think any change was going to be enough in the end and I thought it was better to work on changing how I felt about myself, than changing my body. I’ve seen similarities in the way I experience gender dysphoria, in the way I experience other body image issues.”

For example, Ruby says she has also had an eating disorder, but that she does not think the problem was explored properly in the therapy sessions she attended through gender identity services.

“When I was at my gender clinic to get referred for hormones, we had a session where I went over my mental health issues and I told them about my eating disorder and they didn’t suggest that that could maybe connected with my gender dysphoria,” she says.

“For everyone who has gender dysphoria, whether they are trans or not, I want there to be more options for us because I think there is a system of saying, ‘okay here’s your hormones, here’s your surgery, off you go’. I don’t think that’s helpful for anyone.”

The Detransition Advocacy Network

Evans is now setting up a charity called The Detransition Advocacy Network, which will hold its first meeting in Manchester at the end of this month. The non-profit organization aims to provide guidance to trans people who have undergone gender reassignment, but now want to change back to their original gender.

Evans, who is a freelance science journalist, has previously tweeted: “We know that there is no such thing as a boy brain or a girl brain or that you can be born with the wrong one. We know hormone blockers are unsafe because we need testosterone and oestrogen for development. We need to #BeBrave, and stand together.”

Gender transition offered to children as young as 3 or 4

NHS facilities in the UK have started to offer guidance on gender transition to children as young as 3 or 4 years old and participation in gender transition programs has skyrocketed.

One center, called the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, says that compared with ten years ago, participation has skyrocketed, by 3,200%, with the rate for girls up by 5,337%.

With its records showing that referrals are more common than ever, the center suggests that cases of destransition will also rise.

In a statement, one trust spokesperson disputed Evan’s description saying:

“Decisions about physical interventions made in our care are arrived at after a thorough exploration process. While some of our patients may decide not to pursue physical treatment or drop out of treatment, the experience of regret described here is rarely seen.

However, some people think further research and more discussions are needed surrounding the topic of gender dysphoria, as well as potential alternatives to gender transition. Source

No one should be giving children drugs to change them. If they want to change they can do it when they get old enough. No one has the right to choose the sex a child will be. Adults can decide for themselves. A child cannot. Nor should anyone decide for them. Just becasue a girl is a tom boy means nothing. It certainly does not mean they are gay or anything else. I knew many tom boys as a kid. They grew up to be wives and mothers. The same goes for boys just because say they like to cook or whatever does not mean anything. They too can grow up be husbands and fathers. Kids just need to be kids. Stop putting pressure on them to be something they are not. Kids should just be allowed to be kids. For the ones who did turn out to be gay, not one of them even thought about or realized it until after puberty. Some never realized it until they were in their twenties.

One thought about a sex change, but after looking into the drugs, surgery etc. decided that was not a good way to go. A lot of thought and time went into that decision. Said person was 24, when that thought came into being. Said person was old enough to look at every aspect of it.

A child is not and no one has the right to mess them anyway. You might think you have the right to decide for some odd reason, but if you made the wrong choice for the child and latter in life the child committed suicide, you would be responsible for that death. Drugs can do a lot of damage.

Some thing yes parents can decide for their children. Changing their identity is not one of them.

If someone changed my sex, when I was a kid I would be very angry. I would have sued the doctors and my parents. That is just something you do not touch.

Update March 18 2021

For over 3 years Rob Hoogland has been doing interviews with Press For Truth to tell the world about what’s happening to parental rights in this country and to raise awareness about the dangers transitioning children. For violating the courts gag order a warrant was put out for Rob’s arrest, he is now sitting in jail and potentially facing 5 years in prison! In this video Dan Dicks speaks with Rob Hoogland in the final minutes of his freedom about why he continues his campaign to raise awareness about the dangers of transitioning kids even in the face of a tyrannical government that may put him away for 5 years!!

Published in: on March 18, 2021 at 9:21 am  Comments Off on Man ATTACKED BY ANTIFA THEN ARRESTED For Campaigning Against Giving PUBERTY BLOCKERS TO CHILDREN  

Prolonged lockdown can compromise a child’s immune system, according to immunologist

03/17/2021 / By Virgilio Marin

Children could emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic with underdeveloped immune systems due to prolonged lockdowns that forbid them from going outside, according to Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist who teaches at the University of Guelph in Canada.

In an article published on March 10 in the Conversation, Bridle explained that regular exposure to the environment is critical for children’s immune systems to learn to differentiate between safe versus disease-causing germs.

Being too clean puts children at risk of allergies, autoimmune diseases

A concept in immunology called “hygiene hypothesis” states that interactions with the microbial world – an environment full of bacteria, parasites, viruses and other microorganisms – after birth are extremely important for the proper development of the immune system.

“The immune system is a learning device, and at birth it resembles a computer with hardware and software but few data. Additional data must be supplied during the first years of life, through contact with microorganisms from other humans and the natural environment,” according to a 2016 study cited by Bridle.

Billions of germs reside inside and outside a healthy person’s body. Under normal circumstances, they have a mutually beneficial relationship with their host and promote a robust immune system. But inadequate exposure to the microbial world can weaken young children’s immunity against diseases.

Bridle used the study’s computer analogy to explain why. According to him, the “data” that gets uploaded into the “software” are incomplete, which can cause the immune system to struggle distinguishing between “bad” and “good” bacteria. This, in turn, can lead to allergies, asthma and autoimmune diseases.

Unfortunately, modern-day societies tend to adopt behaviors that limit exposure to germs, such as the overuse of antibiotics and even urbanization, which Bridle said is similar to living in a “concrete jungle.” In fact, studies show that urbanization is partly to blame for the rise of exercise-induced asthma in many middle-income countries over the past several decades. (Related: Prevent asthma by cleaning less: Increased exposure to allergens and pet dander actually reduces risk.)

However, this doesn’t mean that proper hygiene is not necessary. Bridle clarified that proper hygiene is important especially in the context of infection prevention. In fact, he noted, advocates of the hygiene hypothesis discourage the use of the term because it can be misinterpreted to mean that hygiene harms a developing immune system.

For Bridle, the best way to approach hygiene is to practice moderation and “targeted hygiene,” which focuses on implementing sanitary measures at crucial points, such as when handling food, eating, using the bathroom, caring for pets, disposing of garbage and handling dirty laundry.

Pandemic restrictions can affect children’s immune system

Bridle is concerned that pandemic restrictions negatively impact children’s immune system. He noted that government-led responses, such as lockdowns and mask mandates, severely limited children’s interactions with the outside world, thereby increasing their risk of an underdeveloped immune system.

“Most of their extracurricular activities have been cancelled and they have been discouraged from leaving their homes. Even the air they breathe is often filtered by masks and there is prevalent use of hand sanitizer,” Bridle wrote. (Related: Lockdowns, masks destroying mental health of children and young people.)

The very young are the most vulnerable, he said, because more immature immune systems are more prone to becoming dysfunctional. As such, the problem will likely be more prevalent among infants and toddlers, but older children can also suffer from a weakened immunity. Bridle explained that while the immune system is largely mature by around age six, some essential components are still developing as children enters adolescence.

“An unfortunate and under-appreciated long-term legacy of this pandemic will likely be a cluster of ‘pandemic youth’ that grow up to suffer higher-than-average rates of allergies, asthma and autoimmune diseases,” Bridle said.

He added that pandemic restrictions can also cause children to develop hypersensitivities to mRNA vaccines, such as the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, when they get older. mRNA vaccines are known to trigger severe allergic reactions in people with a history of allergies.

Bridle ended his article with a warning: Children raised in largely isolated and highly sanitized environments are at greater risk of developing allergies and autoimmune diseases than anyone before them.

“The immune systems of children are not designed to develop in isolation from the microbial world, so let’s consider letting children be children again,” Bridle concluded.

Sources include:

Learn more about the impact of pandemic restrictions on health at

Expert that worked for Bill Gates Warns of Coming Covid Vaccine Disaster

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

The Covid Vaccines kill and maim people, the numbers grow everyday. They are dangerous.

Masks are just not a good thing They can make you sick

Deep Down the Virus Rabbit Hole – Question Everything

Published in: on March 18, 2021 at 2:25 am  Comments Off on Prolonged lockdown can compromise a child’s immune system, according to immunologist  
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Expert that worked for Bill Gates Warns of Coming Covid Vaccine Disaster

There are four parts to the video below. CDC Spin on New Mask Data; Celebrity Catches Fauci Lying!; Expert Geert Vanden Bossche Warns of Coming Covid Vaccine Disaster; Hell in the Holy Land

Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

His letter to WHO is below the video. Bill Gates will not be impressed.

Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Immediately (Open Letter to the WHO) — Vaccine Research Expert

Mar 7, 2021

Geert Vanden Bossche March 3 Tweet EXTREMELY Concerned

Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD

Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM, is a vaccine research expert. He has a long list of companies and organizations he’s worked with on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK, Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Vanden Bossche also coordinated the Ebola vaccine program at GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization).

He is board-certified in Virology and Microbiology, the author of over 30 publications, and inventor of a patent application for universal vaccines. He currently works as an independent vaccine research consultant. March 6, 2021

“One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.”

Geert Vanden Bossch

Vaccine Research Expert

We’re Risking Creating a Global, “Uncontrollable Monster”

Dr Bossche believes that vaccinologists, clinicians, and scientists are only focusing on short-term results at the individual level and not the consequences at the global population level, which he believes will soon become evident. Evident in the form of  having transformed “a quite harmless virus into an uncontrollable monster”.

His concern rests on ‘immune escape’. For those needing an quick introduction to the topic, read Jemma Moran’s article Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns.

For those needing a sweeping overview of our immunology, watch Ivor Cummins interview Creon Levit, Ep81 The Amazing Immunology of our Viral Issue – Incredible Science at Work! Many physicians would also benefit from watching this (note: the average physician receives exceptionally little training in immunology and virology). Those wishing to dig deeper into immunology in general, read for example, Roitt’s Essential Immunology, Thirteenth Edition.

Bossche states that the multiple emerging, “much more infectious” viral variants, are already examples of “immune escape” from our ‘innate immunity’, and were most-likely created by the government interventions themselves; the so-called Non-Pharmacological Interventions (NPIs) – i.e. lockdowns and cloth facial coverings. Unofficially, but also more aptly known as the Non-Scientific Interventions.

He believes that:

  • Ongoing mass vaccination deployments are “highly-likely to further enhance ‘adaptive’ immune escape as none of the current vaccines will prevent replication/transmission of viral variants”
  • As such, “The more we use these vaccines for immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic, the more infectious the virus will become”.
  • And “With increasing infectiousness comes an increased likelihood of viral resistance to the vaccines”.

He claims his beliefs are basic principles taught in a student’s first vaccinology class – “One shouldn’t use a prophylactic vaccine in populations exposed to high infectious pressure (which is now certainly the case as multiple highly infectious variants are currently circulating”).

He states that to “fully escape”, the highly mutable virus, “only needs to add another few mutations in its receptor-binding domain”.

People Stand to Lose their Natural ‘Innate’ Immunity as a Consequence of the Meddling

His real worry though, or as he puts it, “beyond worried”, is that the humankind may severely damage it’s own, natural ‘innate’ immunity, because of the mass deployment of vaccination programs at this critical juncture. Our ‘innate’ immunity would be lost (a rich, variant-nonspecific, form of natural immunity).

It would also mean that vaccine-mediated protection would be lost.

Geert Vanden Bossche Beyond Worried Keynote

Screenshot of Bossche Keynote – Vaccine Summit (Ohio), March 2nd

All whilst new, more dangerous variants would be getting actively breed by mankind. In effect, “turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction”.

Further Pre-Notes

  • Vanden Bossche – Vaccine Summit Ohio, March 2nd), keynote slides PDF, ‘Why should current Covid-19 vaccines not be used for mass vaccination during a pandemic?’
  • Vanden Bossche – ‘We must halt all ongoing Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns as a temporary health benefit to the most vulnerable groups does not justify a public health disaster of international concern’, summary of the manuscript PDF, February 26th. Note “In our naïve and simplistic attempt to prevent the pandemic from running its natural course, we are in fact providing the beast with an even much better opportunity to escape host immunity than natural infection does.”

Below is his open letter to the WHO, issued March 6th, 2021. I’ve only added more paragraph breaks and blue highlights, to help others be able to process faster.

A PDF version is available.

Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations

Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To all authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entre world population.

I am all but an antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.

The present extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.

As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic.

Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster.

Racing against the clock, I am completing my scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately, likely to come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a summary of my findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine Summit in Ohio on LinkedIn.

Last Monday, I provided international health organizations, including the WHO, with my analysis of the current pandemic as based on scientifically informed insights in the immune biology of Covid-19. Given the level of emergency, I urged them to consider my concerns and to initiate a debate on the detrimental consequences of further ‘viral immune escape’.

For those who are no experts in this field, I am attaching below a more accessible and comprehensible version of the science behind this insidious phenomenon.

While there is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. Experts and politicians have remained silent while obviously still eager to talk about relaxing infection prevention rules and ‘springtime freedom’. My statements are based on nothing else but science. They shall only be contradicted by science.

While one can barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticized by peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table.

Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know – or were not warned.

In this agonizing letter I put all of my reputation and credibility at stake. I expect from you, guardians of mankind, at least the same. It is of utmost urgency. Do open the debate. By all means: turn the tide!

Why mass vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster

THE key question is: why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune escape? Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance. One can easily extrapolate this scourge to resistance to our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’. Indeed, antibodies (Abs) produced by our own immune system can be considered self-made antiviral antibiotics, regardless of whether they are part of our innate immune system (so-called ‘natural’ Abs’) or elicited in response to specific pathogens (resulting in so-called ‘acquired’ Abs).

Natural Abs are not germ-specific whereas acquired Abs are specifically directed at the invading pathogen. At birth, our innate immune system is ‘unexperienced’ but well-established. It protects us from a multitude of pathogens, thereby preventing these pathogens from causing disease.

As the innate immune system cannot remember the pathogens it encountered (innate immunity has no so-called ‘immunological memory’), we can only continue to rely on it provided we keep it ‘trained’ well enough.

Training is achieved by regular exposure to a myriad of environmental agents, including pathogens. However, as we age, we will increasingly face situations where our innate immunity (often called ‘the first line of immune defense’) is not strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of entry (mostly mucosal barriers like respiratory or intestinal epithelia).

When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus.

It is precisely this type of highly specific, high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines are inducing. Of course, the noble purpose of these Abs is to protect us against Covid-19. So, why then should there be a major concern using these vaccines to fight Covid-19?

Well, similar to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics, it is paramount that our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’ are made available in sufficient concentration and are tailored at the specific features of our enemy.

This is why in case of bacterial disease it is critical to not only chose the right type of antibiotic (based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the antibiotic for long enough (according to the prescription).

Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare up. A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the army’s (read: population’s) immune defense starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune escape’).

However, the virus can only rely on this strategy provided it still has room enough to replicate. Viruses, in contrast to the majority of bacteria, must rely on living host cells to replicate. This is why the occurrence of ‘escape mutants’ isn’t too worrisome as long as the likelihood for these variants to rapidly find another host is quite remote. However, that’s not particularly the case during a viral pandemic!

During a pandemic, the virus is spreading all over the globe with many subjects shedding and transmitting the virus (even including asymptomatic ‘carriers’). The higher the viral load, the higher the likelihood for the virus to bump into subjects who haven’t been infected yet or who were infected but didn’t develop symptoms. Unless they are sufficiently protected by their innate immune defense (through natural Abs), they will catch Covid-19 disease as they cannot rely on other, i.e., acquired Abs.

It has been extensively reported, indeed, that the increase in S (spike)-specific Abs in asymptomatically infected people is rather limited and only short-lived. Furthermore, these Abs have not achieved full maturity.

The combination of viral infection on a background of suboptimal Ab maturity and concentration enables the virus to select mutations allowing it to escape the immune pressure. The selection of those mutations preferably occurs in the S protein as this is the viral protein that is responsible for viral infectiousness.

As the selected mutations endow the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes much easier for the virus to cause severe disease in infected subjects. The more people develop symptomatic disease, the better the virus can secure its propagation and perpetuation (people who get severe disease will shed more virus and for a longer period of time than asymptomatically infected subjects do).

Unfortunately, enough, the short-lived rise in S-specific Abs does, however, surface to bypass people’s innate/natural Ab. Those are put out of business as their affinity for S is lower than the affinity of S-specific Abs. This is to say that with an increasing rate of infection in the population, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in S-specific Abs will steadily increase.

Consequently, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary decrease in their innate immunity will increase. As a result, a steadily increasing number of subjects will become more susceptible to getting severe disease instead of showing only mild symptoms (i.e., limited to the upper respiratory tract) or no symptoms at all.

During a pandemic, especially youngsters will be affected by this evolution as their natural Abs are not yet largely suppressed by a panoply of ‘acquired’, antigen-specific Abs. Natural Abs, and natural immunity in general, play a critical role in protecting us from pathogens as they constitute our first line of immune defense. In contrast to acquired immunity, innate immune responses protect against a large spectrum of pathogens (so don’t compromise or sacrifice your innate immune defense!).

Because natural Abs and innate immune cells recognize a diversified spectrum of foreign (i.e., non-self) agents (only some of which have pathogenic potential), it’s important, indeed, to keep it sufficiently exposed to environmental challenges.

By keeping the innate immune system (which, unfortunately, has no memory!) TRAINED, we can much more easily resist germs which have real pathogenic potential. It has, for example, been reported and scientifically proven that exposure to other, quite harmless Coronaviruses causing a ‘common cold ’ can provide protection, although short-lived, against Covid-19 and its loyal henchmen (i.e., the more infectious variants).

Suppression of innate immunity, especially in the younger age groups, can, therefore, become very problematic. There can be no doubt that lack of exposure due to stringent containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not been beneficial to keeping people’s innate immune system well trained.

As if this was not already heavily compromising innate immune defense in this population segment, there comes yet another force into play that will dramatically enhance morbidity and mortality rates in the younger age groups: MASS VACCINATION of the ELDERLY.

The more extensively the later age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups.

This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. If the virus manages to do so, it can benefit from the (momentarily) suppressed innate immunity, thereby causing disease in an increasing number of these subjects and ensuring its own propagation.

Selecting targeted mutations in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to getting the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense.

But in the meantime, we’re also facing a huge problem in vaccinated people as they’re now more and more confronted with infectious variants displaying a type of S protein that is increasingly different from the S edition comprised with the vaccine (the later edition originates from the original, much less infectious strain at the beginning of the pandemic).

The more variants become infectious (i.e., as a result of blocking access of the virus to the vaccinated segment of the population), the less vaccinal Abs will protect. Already now, lack of protection is leading to viral shedding and transmission in vaccine recipients who are exposed to these more infectious strains (which, by the way, increasingly dominate the field).

This is how we are currently turning vaccines into asymptomatic carriers shedding infectious variants.

At some point, in a likely very near future, it’s going to become more profitable (in term of ‘return on selection investment’) for the virus to just add another few mutations (maybe just one or two) to the S protein of viral variants (already endowed with multiple mutations enhancing infectiousness) in an attempt to further strengthen its binding to the receptor (ACE-2) expressed on the surface of permissive epithelial cells.

This will now allow the new variant to outcompete vaccinal Abs for binding to the ACE receptor. This is to say that at this stage, it would only take very few additional targeted mutations within the viral receptor-binding domain to fully resist S-specific ant-Covid-19 Abs, regardless whether the later are elicited by the vaccine or by natural infection.

At that stage, the virus will, indeed, have managed to gain access to a huge reservoir of subjects who have now become highly susceptible to disease as their S-specific Abs have now become useless in terms of protection but still manage to provide for long-lived suppression of their innate immunity (i.e., natural infection, and especially vaccination, elicit relatively long-lived specific Ab titers). The susceptible reservoir comprises both, vaccinated people and those who’re left with sufficient S-specific Abs due to previous Covid-19 disease).So, MISSION

ACCOMPLISHED for Covid-19 but a DISASTROUS SITUATION for all vaccinated subjects and Covid-19 seropositive people as they’ve now lost both, their acquired and innate immune defense against Covid-19 (while highly infectious strains are circulating!).

That’s ‘one small step for the virus, one giant catastrophe for mankind’, which is to say that we’ll have whipped up the virus in the younger population up to a level that it now takes little effort for Covid-19 to transform into a highly infectious virus that completely ignores both the innate arm of our immune system as well as the adaptive/acquired one (regardless of whether the acquired Abs resulted from vaccination or natural infection).

The effort for the virus is now becoming even more negligible given that many vaccine recipients are now exposed to highly infectious viral variants while having received only a single shot of the vaccine.

Hence, they are endowed with Abs that have not yet acquired optimal functionality. There is no need to explain that this is just going to further enhance immune escape. Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system.

From all of the above, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population.

One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.

It’s certainly also worth mentioning that mutations in the S protein (i.e., exactly the same protein that is subject to selection of escape mutations) are known to enable Coronaviruses to cross species barriers.

This is to say that the risk that vaccine-mediated immune escape could allow the virus to jump to other animal species, especially industrial livestock (e.g., pig and poultry farms), is not negligible. These species are already known to host several different Coronaviruses and are usually housed in farms with high stocking density.

Similar to the situation with influenza virus, these species could than serve as an additional reservoir for SARS-COVID-2 virus.

As pathogens have co-evolved with the host immune system, natural pandemics of acute self-limiting viral infections have been shaped such as to take a toll on human lives that is not higher than strictly required.

Due to human intervention, the course of this pandemic has been thoroughly disturbed as of the very beginning. Widespread and stringent infection prevention measures combined with mass vaccination campaigns using inadequate vaccines will undoubtedly lead to a situation where the pandemic is getting increasingly ‘out of control’.

Paradoxically, the only intervention that could offer a perspective to end this pandemic (other than to let it run its disastrous course) is …VACCINATION. Of course, the type of vaccines to be used would be completely different of conventional vaccines in that they’re not inducing the usual suspects, i.e., B and T cells, but NK cells.

There is, indeed, compelling scientific evidence that these cells play a key role in facilitating complete elimination of Covid-19 at an early stage of infection in asymptomatically infected subjects.

NK cells are part of the cellular arm of our innate immune system and, alike natural Abs, they are capable of recognizing and attacking a broad and diversified spectrum of pathogenic agents.

There is a sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to ‘prime’ NK cells in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large (include all their variants) at an early stage of infection. NK cells have increasingly been described to be endowed with the capacity to acquire immunological memory.

By educating these cells in ways that enable them to durably recognize and target Coronavirus-infected cells, our immune system could be perfectly armed for a targeted attack to the universe of Coronaviruses prior to exposure.

As NK cell-based immune defense provides sterilizing immunity and allows for broad-spectrum and fast protection, it is reasonable to assume that harnessing our innate immune cells is going to be the only type of human intervention left to halt the dangerous spread of highly infectious Covid-19 variants.

If we, human beings, are committed to perpetuating our species, we have no choice left but to eradicate these highly infectious viral variants. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. However, NK cell-based vaccines will primarily enable our natural immunity to be better prepared (memory!) and to induce herd immunity (which is exactly the opposite of what current Covid-19 vaccines do as those increasingly turn vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who are shedding virus).

So, there is not one second left for gears to be switched and to replace the current killer vaccines by life-saving vaccines.

I am appealing to the WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN.

The entire Video of Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD

The Covid Vaccines kill and maim people, the numbers grow everyday. They are dangerous.

Canadian Doctors Speak Out and Child being taken from a Parent

Universities, Government and Media prepare for psychological war against you

JAB Kids with Covid Vaccines as fast as we can Say SAGE On BBC

Published in: on March 14, 2021 at 2:38 am  Comments (3)  
Tags: , , , , ,

Canadian Doctors Speak Out and Child being taken from a Parent

March 8, 2021

Finally They are talking.

Gut Wrenching COVID CHILD CUSTODY CASE!! Disagree With The Narrative And THEY’LL TAKE YOUR KID!!!

Links for the above Video

Custody decision

More insanity

A new Holiday


No wonder watching the main stream media drives people over the edge. Even the Judge has been watching to much of the BS Lies. Maybe someone should give him all the Freedom of information requests and answers that Canada has not Isolated the virus either. I think the Judge needs a wake up call. If he were here I would do that. That could be anyone’s child. One day it may be your child. It is time for all of this to be stopped. Canada is a complete disgrace. Stealing children and kidnapping adults.

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Covid Lawsuits against Governments and Others

ER Doctor – “We’re Being Deceived and Manipulated”

March 12, 2021

left. Mark Trozzi MD
There is only one courageous honest doctor in Ontario, who takes the Hippocratic Oath seriously.
“Both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple long ER shifts without a single patient.” 

“I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19.”

“My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal.”

My Personal Testimony 

 My name is Mark Trozzi. I am a medical doctor; I graduated in 1990 from The University of Western Ontario. I have been practicing Emergency Medicine for the past twenty-five years; and I have been on call in multiple emergency units since the onset of the so-called “pandemic”, including one ER designated specifically for COVID-19. 
I am an Advanced Trauma Life Support professor with the College of Surgeons of America, and I hold teaching positions at Sunnybrook Health Sciences in the Advanced Life Support Department, as well as with both Queen’s University and The University of Ottawa.
What follows is my  observations and opinions; I am bound by my personal and religious convictions to speak openly and honestly. I do not have authority to tell you “the truth”, but I will share my honest experiences, perceptions, and digests of hundreds of hours of research on the subject of covid-19.
At the onset of this “pandemic”, I was cautious and hence meticulous with N95 mask use, hand washing, social isolation and distancing etc. I studied coronavirus science and was deeply involved in many emergency department drills to modify our practice in profound ways to deal with the “killer virus” we were advertised. However, various things soon made me consider that we were being deceived and manipulated. 
Here are a few:
The “first wave” of the “pandemic” was absolutely the quietest time in my career. I have worked very hard and been very busy over the past twenty-five years in ER. 
However, both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple long ER shifts without a single patient. 
Meanwhile, when I would go to the local grocery store, the propagandized public, God bless them, would usher me to the front of the antisocial distance line, thanking me for everything I was going through as a front-line emergency doctor. 
They believed that the ER’s and hospitals were full of patients dying from covid, and that I must be exhausted and at risk of dying myself from exposure. I began contacting doctors and friends all over Canada and the US, and found the same pattern: empty hospitals, and propaganda saying that they were full of patients dying of covid.
Early in my studies, I investigated zinc and hydroxychloroquine, which based on sound physiology, may genuinely help those rare persons who get very sick with this cold virus. I was surprised that this treatment was simply brushed aside and dismissed by most of the medical community.
Researching the World Health Organization, of the UN, I learned that the Chinese dictatorship (PRC) had propped up a ******* communist “Dr” Tedros, as the head of the WHO; and I learned how the PRC had been involved in: the virus release; the cover-up for weeks; the disappearing and suppression of honest Chinese doctors and scientist; the spreading of the virus to the world (sparing Beijing where the PRC elite live);  and dramatic abuse of the Chinese people in their well-timed lockdown, which was filmed and transmitted to the world to create the panic that herded all of us into surrendering our economies and civil rights.

I learned how Canada’s chief public health officer Dr Tam, is on the oversight committee of the WHO with Dr Tedros, essentially making her a ******-agent; and I listened to her often-******* dissertations to Canadians regarding covid-19.
 At every level, hospital administration has had no apparent choice, other than to submit to the endless top-down roll out from governments, of questionable new rules, protocols, and procedures.
 My honest conversations with coworkers about my research and observations, became a problem. Caught in this quandary, an important administrator who I greatly respect, told me that “my thoughts made others uncomfortable, and made it difficult to keep everyone motivated and compliant” with all the new protocols and restrictions. 
Sympathetic to the sad situation, I maintained my clinical position by promising to “bite my tongue any time I thought I was going to speak about COVID-19” in the hospital. This was ultimately ethically impossible for me, and I have recently removed myself from the ER to avoid conflict.
I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19; I have seen some positive PCR tests in asymptomatic people, and watched people be imprisoned in their own homes and isolated from family and friends. 
My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal. 
My province alone has performed ~50,000 PCR tests daily. Meanwhile our federal government is bringing in hundreds of thousands of doses of potentially dangerous experimental injections of modified viral genetic material, calling them “vaccines”, and having the military manage them. Is this reasonable for a predominantly mild and non-fatal viral illness.
I have watched the suppression of doctors and scientists who performed serum antibody studies, whose findings showed that the virus was much more widespread, yet generally nonfatal, and asymptomatic or very mild in most cases; and that in many regions we had likely already achieved natural herd immunity by summer 2020.

Look at this study performed in Wuhan itself, which shows that the virus was done there by June 1, 2020 just two months after their brief lockdowns ended, and no one was spreading it, not even the very few people with a positive PCR “test” (and they were not sick): 
I noticed that after China’s theatric lockdown, they quickly went back to business as usual, while all our economies were frozen; they gained tremendous control over the world’s marketplace. It seems a great, though evil strategy!POLITICAL MANIPULATION OF HEALTH CARE WORKERS
I perceive that many things we learned in medical school about infectious disease, have been brushed aside and replaced by constantly expanding lists of often ******* mandates by public health officials. Doctors, nurses, and teachers are especially important to the success of this COVID-19 deception, as we are leaders in society and people trust our advice. 
So, it is no surprise that I have found free speech and thought have been very suppressed in our ranks. Rather than endure the punishments of dissenting, we can choose to experience the short-sighted perks like extremely quiet days in the ER, replacing our traditional hands-on work with Zoom sessions from home; and accessing a variety of new COVID-19 ******* codes. 
At one point, an option existed to make more money than I normally make working in a busy  ER, to just stay home and be available in case the covid swabbing nurse needed to video conference with me.
There are many positive and negative motivators being used to manipulate Canadian doctors, nurses and teachers, to inadvertently participate in this grand covid deception; but  this is destroying our society. To use a Titanic metaphor: “even the luxury suites on the Titanic end up at the bottom of the ocean when she sinks”. Also, much of what is being done, including the experimental viral genetic injections, seem to violate the Nuremberg code regarding medical experimentation with full informed consent by the participants. Doctor’s and nurses face tough decisions. My career as an emergency physician always provided me an opportunity to practice my religious and ethical beliefs of honesty and kindness, while making a good living. Now maintaining the career I love,  would require participating in the deception, violating my oath and spiritual beliefs, and in my opinion committing crimes against humanity as defined by  the Nuremberg Code.
I empathize with all my fellow doctors and nurses. We are all victims of the covid abuse.

I researched and perceived how  corrupt oligarchs seem to have planned this crime against humanity. This planning included Event 201 which was a simulation of a corona pandemic conducted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University in October 2019; and the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 Viral outbreak simulation planning called “Operation Lockstep”. 
Both these projects described how a viral outbreak would be used to bring in an authoritarian system with the loss of our human rights and freedoms. I also observed how their cohorts in big tech like Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube worked to censor and deceive us all; it’s genuine propaganda.
The forced wearing of masks by most of the world’s population is not unanimously supported by real science. These masks cause significant harm to our psychologic, social, dermatologic, dental and otolaryngotic health. Though I generally have great health, the masks have given me rashes and nasal symptoms whenever I have had to wear them for prolonged periods, which resolve whenever I  do not wear them for a few days. What I find most disturbing is the elimination of facial expressions, and hence normal visual social interaction.
 The history of past attempts at vaccines for coronaviruses, revealed some very dangerous side effects in animal models, and the efforts were abandoned.  Why would we take a dangerous vaccine for a generally mild illness, to which we develop herd immunity anyways? The current roll-out of fast tracked expensive experimental “vaccines” is burying the taxpayers in endless debt to the rich and powerful villains of this story. Yet, we the people who have been imprisoned and abused in this scandal, are being manipulated into taking  new strange injections, in hopes that we might regain some of our freedom.  Additionally the so called “vaccines” are not vaccines (unless we change the definition of vaccines). Rather they are injections of Corona virus genes. See the section This Is Not A Vaccine

Recently, I have made some tough personal decisions; surrendering income and personal security, to choose an ethical and honest path forward, that may help contribute to an outcome that is true and just; and to the return of our free society and civil liberties.  I believe that we are almost all victims in this, regardless of where we are on the path for the recovery of truth.
———-Thanks to DL!RelatedCanadian Doctors Speak Out
I asked Mark about the financial cost of exposing the covid hoax:
“Regarding the financial costs of my current actions to counter this criminal covid enterprise, I have suspended all clinical work, and forfeited all hospital privilege’s, to hopefully protect my license while I do this, so that’s about $200,000 a year that I am no longer making as of January. However, to compensate for this, I have sold my home, and we have downsized to a small shared space. The costs of the technology, website, and resources is only a few thousand dollars. I am living off some small savings and hoping to continue to support my family, including a son in university. It is indeed a tenuous situation; but the need to do this is absolute. I am very grateful for your help.”

First Comment from Gabriel-

I’ve been a fly on the wall of the doctor’s office for 25 years.  Working as a telephonic language medical interpreter.  Everyday, after working, I am disgusted. The medical industry is the most evil of all.  It’s a meat grinder.  It’s all about drugs and mutilation.  It’s just a vassal of the powers that be, used to slowly torture and kill people.  You know those cabalists, they love sacrifice.  So avoid the doctor like the plague. 
This is what they do:  perfectly healthy people go for a stupid check up; The good doc tells them:  “this is what we saw in your blood and urine tests: your sugar is a little high, to prevent diabetes I will prescribe you Metformin, take one every day.  
Also I noticed your cholesterol is a little high, to prevent heart problems I will prescribe you Simvastatin, take one every day.  Your blood pressure was a little high as well, I will prescribe you Lyssinopril to keep it under control, take one everyday” 
This kind of scenario goes on all the time. Most of the time the fools believe everything the doctor says and follow their directions.  So these perfectly healthy people now are destroying themselves with these extremely toxic drugs, taking them, potentially, for life.  So avoid the doctor like the plague. 
Emergency medical services are wonderful and very necessary, the rest of allopathic medicine is, with few exceptions, a genocidal enterprise.  Also there are good docs out there, but few and far between.  For the most part they have no personality, they are very robotic; totally brainwashed and indoctrinated by medical school. Source

A lot of information about mask wearing and children Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent

The Virus has not been Isolated. Evidence Covid Virus does not exist

Even China has not isolated the virus Air on NBC Jan 23, 2021

CDC director in China admitting they never isolated the virus.

Mask Harms in Kids: 68% of Parents Report Alarming Psychological and Physical Problems In First-of-its-kind Study

PCR test are meaningless

Deaths and Injuries due to covid vaccines

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People


ICU Nurse Whistleblower: Ontario Canada

Universities, Government and Media prepare for psychological war against you

Mass Manipulation – How It Works

Police Officers called upon by fellow officer to “Remember Your Oath”

Last time I heard they are 9,000 strong and growing, Rethink the Covid protocols. They are wrong.

If you are now or are a former Police officer Join the Police on Guard for thee

Mask Burning at Idaho State Capitol

Quebec Curfew Declared Unconstitutional

March 8, 2021 Sheila Gunn Reid provides an update from outside of GraceLife Church, just west of Edmonton, Alberta where the church’s pastor, James Coates, remains behind bars.

PETITION: Free Pastor James

Pastor James Coates of GraceLife Church remains behind bars today. Sign our petition to show your support and take a stand against the tyrannical COVID enforcement Pastor James and his church are facing.

FULL REPORT from Sheila Gunn Reid:

Published in: on March 9, 2021 at 7:34 am  Comments Off on Canadian Doctors Speak Out and Child being taken from a Parent  
Tags: , , , ,

First Court Case Against Mandatory Vaccination in New Mexico

March 8, 2021

It’s Here: First Court Case Against Mandatory Vaccination: Attorney Interview

In this interview, Spiro is joined by Attorney Ana Garner of New Mexico. Garner represents her client Isaac Legaretta, an officer at the Doña Ana County Detention Center and a military veteran, who is suing the county over its new policy for first responders to receive the COVID-19 vaccinations or face termination.

More on the above lawsuit. 

New Mexico Stands Up!

 As and experimental Vaccine it would be illegal under the Nuremberg Code. No one can be forced etc into getting it.

Schools Using Blackmail To Get Consent Forms Signed!

Don’t let this happen to children. They should not be forced to be tested, wear masks or to be vaccinated.

Forced to Get the COVID Vaccine? ICAN May Be Able to Help.

Deaths and injuries due to vaccines

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Reiner Fuellmich With Other German Lawyers Class Action

Pfizer Demanding Bank Reserves, Military Bases And Embassy Buildings As Collateral For COVID-19 Vaccines

Evidence Covid Virus does not exist

Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud

Mask Harms in Kids: 68% of Parents Report Alarming Psychological and Physical Problems In First-of-its-kind Study

Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent

Texas, Mississippi opening up, London Police give up on policing restrictions

Published in: on March 8, 2021 at 7:43 pm  Comments Off on First Court Case Against Mandatory Vaccination in New Mexico  
Tags: , , ,

Texas, Mississippi opening up, London Police give up on policing restrictions

March 2, 2021

London Police Says COVID Rules No Longer “Policeable” as Huge Crowds Turn Out for the Sun in Defiance of Government

Texas gov lifts mask mandate & OKs businesses to operate at 100% capacity

Greg Abbott delivered the “exciting news” during a speech to the Lubbock Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday, informing the assembled small business and community leaders that the mask mandate – in place since July – was no more.

“We must now do more to restore livelihoods and normalcy for Texans by opening Texas 100 percent,” Abbott said in a statement on Tuesday – Texas’ Independence Day.

The governor’s view contrasted sharply with that of President Joe Biden, who has so latched on to the idea of masks that he actually planned to send millions of them all around the country. He also expects Americans to remain obediently masked-up through to 2022,

‘It is time!’ Mississippi governor to end mask mandate & lift all Covid-19 business restrictions, following Texas’ lead

Links for News reports they talk about in the above video. They would not be able to put that video on youtube. How sad is that.

Side effects and deaths due to the vaccines are a nightmare.

Pfizer Demanding Bank Reserves, Military Bases And Embassy Buildings As Collateral For COVID-19 Vaccines

Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”

Tanzanian President John Pombe Magufuli. has masters and doctorate degrees in chemistry from The University of Dar es Salaam.

Tanzanian President Says Citizens Will Not Be Guinea Pigs in COVID Vaccine Trials – Skeptical About Safety of Current COVID-19 Vaccines

The only thing the vaccines do is if you get covid, you will have less symptoms.

So logic tell me that those that are vaccinated will be super spreaders.

This in not a vaccine. A vaccine is suppose to prevent, you from getting what ever. The so called, Covid gene therapy injection, prevents nothing, except if you are really lucky, less symptoms, if you do get it. You can still get the so called Covid, you can still spread the so called Covid. The so called Covid has never been isolated of course. So it is not even preventing, the so called Covid either. The tests for the so called Covid are useless.

My thought is, if you have gotten the so called gene therapy injection, please stay away from me. Whatever is in it, is making others very sick. Odd how the vaccine is introduced and all of a sudden many get the so called covid right after. Are they really getting the so called covid? I really think they need to take a long hard look at, what is really in those vaccines. They certainly do kill a lot of people. They certainly have maimed a lot of people. They have no idea, what the long term side effects, will be either. Gene therapy is not a vaccine. Do the research. The more you dig, the more you learn.

Even China has not Isolated the virus. That comes a fellow that works in the CDC, in China.

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Someone left this in the comment section. So to William, thank you and yes I did laugh. Now when you go out to protest make sure you obey the law.

12 US states and 7 countries that have barred protesters from wearing masks

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

Published in: on March 3, 2021 at 4:13 pm  Comments Off on Texas, Mississippi opening up, London Police give up on policing restrictions  
Tags: , ,

Pfizer Demanding Bank Reserves, Military Bases And Embassy Buildings As Collateral For COVID-19 Vaccines

I am not sure what you would call this. Attempting to take over a country via drug blackmail maybe. Part of the World Economic Forums Agenda is to take over land. I guess Pfizer wants into the land grab.

They really do not want the vaccine as it is dangerous anyway. As noted over the past two months.

February 27, 2021

Pharma giant Pfizer has been holding sovereign governments to ransom making bizarre demands asking for bank reserves, embassy buildings and military bases as collateral in return for COVID-19 vaccines.

The US-based company Pfizer is holding governments to ransom, interfering with their legislation, and even demanding military bases as guarantee.

pfizer demanding bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings as collateral for covid 19 vaccines

Pfizer asked the Govt of Argentina to be compensated for the cost of any future civil lawsuits, reported WION.

If someone files a civil lawsuit against Pfizer in Argentina and wins that case, the government of Argentina and not Pfizer would pay the compensation.

So, Argentina’s parliament passed a new law in October 2020, but Pfizer was unhappy with its phrasing.

The law said Pfizer needs to at least pay for negligence, for its own mistakes if it happens to make any in the future.

Pfizer rejected this, after which Argentina offered to amend the law to define negligence more clearly – to include only vaccine distribution and delivery under negligence.

Pfizer was still not happy and demanded the law be amended through a new decree, which Argentina refused.

Pfizer then asked Argentina to buy an international insurance to pay for potential future cases against Pfizer, to which the country agreed.

But that was not enough, in December 2020, Pfizer again came back with more demands.

And this time Pfizer demanded Argentina’s sovereign assets as collateral. Pfizer demanded that Argentina put its bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings at stake.

Argentina did not agree with Pfizer’s demands.

Another country Pfizer made such bizarre demands is with Brazil. Pfizer told the Govt of Brazil to create a guarantee fund, and deposit money in a foreign bank account.

On January 23, 2021 – Brazil’s Health Ministry put out a statement citing excerpts from Pfizer’s pre-contract clauses.

Here’s a list of Pfizer’s demands:

• Brazil waives the sovereignty of its assets abroad in favour of Pfizer,
• that the rules of the land – be not applied on Pfizer,
• that Brazil take into consideration a delay in delivery,
• that Pfizer is not penalised for a delayed delivery, and
• that in case of any side effects, Pfizer be exempted from all civil liability.

The government of Brazil calls these clauses abusive. The Pfizer deal with Brazil failed too.

Pfizer even wanted India to order its COVID-19 vaccines without any local trials.

According to the co-founder of BioNTech Dr Ugur Sahin, the COVID-19 vaccine he designed for Pfizer was designed in just few hours in a single day on January 25, 2020. No other vaccine in history has been created and manufactured so quickly.

Previously, the fastest vaccine ever developed took more than four years.

As reported by GreatGameIndia earlier, Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.

Even, the US government paid over $57 million in compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths till March 2020 alone. Source

Just out today March 9, 2021 In this report it goes into a lot of details, about the vaccines everyone should know about.

Pfizer Demands Nations Put Up Collateral to Cover Vaccine Injury Lawsuits

Deaths and Injuries due to Covid vaccines.

In Israel it seems the more vaccines they give the more so Called Covid and deaths they are getting. This episode covers a lot. The World is FED UP with Covid19; Testing on Children Begins; Israel’s New Covid Pass; Owner of the Busiest No-Mask Store in FL; Cattle Rancher Exposes Our Fragile Food Supply

Reiner Fuellmich With Other German Lawyers Class Action

Ottawa Canada: Parliament Hill Protest Feb 14, 2021

Recently updated. Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Corona Fake Pandemic: Italy Subjected to a Holy Inquisition of False Science

Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

Published in: on February 27, 2021 at 8:08 pm  Comments Off on Pfizer Demanding Bank Reserves, Military Bases And Embassy Buildings As Collateral For COVID-19 Vaccines  
Tags: , ,

Reiner Fuellmich With Other German Lawyers Class Action

The greatest Nuremberg of all time is on its way (NB: translated from German)
By Jean-Michel Grau

Right now, a second Nuremberg tribunal that is in preparation, with a class action lawsuit being set up under the aegis of thousands of lawyers worldwide behind the American-German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who is prosecuting those responsible for the Covid-19 scandal manipulated by the Davos Forum.

In this respect, it is worth recalling that Reiner Fuellmich is the lawyer who succeeded in condemning the automobile giant Volkswagen in the case of the tampered catalytic converters. And it is this same lawyer who succeeded in condemning Deutsche Bank as a criminal enterprise.

According to Reiner Fuellmich, all the frauds committed by German companies are derisory compared to the damage that the Covid-19 crisis has caused and continues to cause. This Covid-19 crisis should be renamed the “Covid-19 Scandal” and all those responsible should be prosecuted for civil damages due to manipulations and falsified test protocols. Therefore, an international network of business lawyers will plead the biggest tort case of all time, the Covid-19 fraud scandal, which has meanwhile turned into the biggest crime against humanity ever committed.

A Covid-19 commission of enquiry has been set up on the initiative of a group of German lawyers with the aim of bringing an international class action lawsuit using Anglo-Saxon law. Here is the summarized translation of the last communication of Dr. Fuellmich of 15/02/2021

“The hearings of around 100 internationally renowned scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers, which have been conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 affair since 10.07.2020, have in the meantime shown with a probability close to certainty that the Covid- 19 scandal was at no time a health issue. Rather, it was about solidifying the illegitimate power (illegitimate because it was obtained by criminal methods) of the corrupt “Davos clique” by transferring the wealth of the people to the members of the Davos clique, destroying, among other things, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. Platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc. could thus appropriate their market share and wealth.”

Status of the Covid-19 Committee investigation

a. Covid-19 as a diversionary tactic by corporate and political “elites” in order to shift market share and wealth from small and medium enterprises to global platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc.

b. Contribution of the Audiovisual Tax to the reconstruction of a new media landscape that offers truly independent information

c. Making regional agricultural structures secure

d. Making a secure regional currency to prevent a new currency from coming “from above” to be allocated in the event of good behaviour.

e. Psychological considerations of the situation: how did it come about?
Actions for annulment of the approval of a vaccination, filed against the European Commission, trial in New York of the status of PCR tests, German trials, Canadian trials, Australian trials, Austrian trials, trials at the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights.

“We have seen what has been confirmed time and time again: the degree of danger posed by the virus is about the same as that of seasonal flu, regardless of whether it is a new virus (wholly or partially manufactured) or whether we are simply dealing with a flu renamed “Covid-19 pandemic”. In the meantime, Drosten’s PCR tests cannot even tell us anything about contagious infections. To make matters worse, the health and economic damage caused by anti-covid measures has been so devastating that we have to speak of a level of destruction that is historically unique. »

“The fact that health has never been an issue is particularly obvious, except that injections of genetically experimental substances disguised as “vaccinations” are now cauing serious damage, including fatal consequences, on a mass scale. The world population has been used as guinea pigs for these experimental gene injections both gradually and extremely rapidly. In order to plunge the population into panic, dangerous and harmful containment measures (even according to the WHO) of compulsory, unnecessary and dangerous mask-wearing and social distancing, unnecessary and counterproductive, were introduced. The population was thus “ready” for the injections.”

“In the meantime, more and more people, not just lawyers – and rightly so – are demanding, in addition to an immediate end to these murderous measures, a judicial review by a truly independent international tribunal on the model of the Nuremberg trials. An example of such a demand and a moving excerpt from a speech by the English doctor Dr. Vernon Coleman can be found at the following link:( That one has been removed already. Check these ones out.

Proof the NHS is Lying – This is Genocide and the Jabs Must Stop Now!

Following the Science? Don’t Make Me Laugh. Here is one from Vernon that is worth listening

In addition, an interview with a whistleblower at a Berlin nursing home shows that out of 31 people vaccinated there, some of them by force, in the presence of Bundeswehr soldiers, and who tested negative before the vaccination, 8 have now died and 11 are subject to serious side effects.” (
Extraordinary meeting of the Berlin Covid Committee Wednesday 17/02/2021

“In this context, an extraordinary meeting of the Berlin Covid Committee will take place on Wednesday 17.02.2021, live and with many guests participating via Zoom.
From 14:00 onwards, the state of play will be summarised. In addition, it will be discussed how the contributions from the Audiovisual Licence Fee Tax can be kept and used for the reconstruction of a new media landscape that truly serves freedom of expression, and how the contributions already paid for the senseless propaganda of the last 11 months can be recovered through a formal notice.

There will be contributions and discussions on how the food supply can be secured, in particular by strengthening regional agriculture; but also by creating regional currencies, if necessary with the return of the EU to the EEC, on how to ensure that the policy of the “Davos clique”, based on printing money out of nothing, can be stopped and a return to stable currencies can be achieved.

Above all, experts will explain how it could happen that we find ourselves in this blackmail situation unimaginable even a year ago.

In the second part of the session, starting at 7 p.m., world-renowned and high-level personalities will comment on the state of current international legal disputes, including the various collective actions, as summarised above. But it will also be discussed how the main perpetrators, in particular political perpetrators, of the crimes against humanity committed here can and must be held accountable under civil and criminal law in the framework of a new International Court of Justice to be established in accordance with the guidelines of the Nuremberg trials with international distribution.”

The link to the special session of the Covid Committee announced here will be available on 17.02.2021 via the Committee’s website (
Commentary :

To fully understand what is at stake with this new Nuremberg tribunal to judge the biggest tort case of all time, it is by pulling the thread of Dr. Drosten’s lie for falsifying the PCR testing protocol on behalf of the Davos clique, that everything will come to pass: the sponsors of the financial oligarchy, Klaus Schwab, the great architect of this gigantic hostage-taking, the politicians at the head of the EU, the armed arm of the execution of Drosten’s and WHO directives that led all Western governments yesterday to take the devastating decisions of containment, curfews, compulsory mask-wearing and social distancing, and today of lethal vaccines for the oldest among us.

“It is these truths that will bring down the masks of those responsible for the crimes committed. To the politicians who have had faith in these corrupt figures,” says Dr. Fuellmich, “the facts presented here are the lifeline that will help them to set the record straight and begin the much- needed scientific debate to avoid going down with these criminal charlatans.

Secondly, in the light of this latest communication by Dr Fuellmich, two proposals from the extraordinary meeting of the Covid Committee in Berlin are of particular interest:

Firstly, the way in which the food supply can be secured, which seems somewhat surreal given the current situation. According to Klaus Schwab’s planning for the Davos Forum, this is not the case. He has predicted a break in the food chain from the end of the second half of 2021 (

Secondly, the creation of regional currencies. There, it is clear that the Covid Committee of Berlin already anticipates the world stock market crash which is coming and which the financial oligarchy of the Davos Forum intends to take advantage of to set up the European digital currency in the expectation of a world currency to create a Chinese-style social credit on which the middle class of all the peoples ruined by the closure of their businesses, small and medium-sized industries and enterprises, cultural and tourist industries, sports facilities, etc. will become dependent.

These two aspects alone of the hostage-taking 2.0 of which the Western world has been a victim for almost a year should logically be sufficiently motivating to make us understand definitively that we are faced with a “populicide” that only asks to crush us if we remain inert, arms dangling without doing anything.

This is why each of us should do everything we can now to ensure that this international legal coalition can become operational as soon as possible. To this end, all those of us who wish to join the collective action of French lawyers to participate in this reconquest of our freedoms should already get in touch with the collective action by 21 February ( de- paris). Our survival is at this price as well as the future of our children.


Whistleblower aus Berliner Altenheim: Das schreckliche Sterben nach der …
Erstmalig gibt es einen Augenzeugenbericht aus einem Berliner Altenheim zur Lage nach der Impfung. Er stammt aus…

Stiftung Corona Ausschuss Source

WHO insiders blow the whistle total immunity of BIll Gates through GAVI – world vaccine alliance.
Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and lawyer Dr. Justus P. Hoffmann interviewing Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger and Dr.Silvia Behrendt on total immunity of Bill Gates through GAVI – world vaccine alliance

German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation

WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Vaccines safety

Knowing how many are dieing and becoming injured, I have to say, I would not depend on these people to keep me safe from the vaccines.

Doctors’ Alliance calls for Nuremberg-style trials for all of those responsible for covid crimes

This is when much of the above began Reiner Fuellmich explains things extremely well. The above is just an addition to what began in October.

Legal Action against Covid PCR Tests, Crimes Against Humanity

Here are many deaths and injuries from the vaccines to date. Be warned some of this is very disturbing.

Covid Lawsuits against Governments and Others

Nuremberg Code.

Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud

Published in: on February 23, 2021 at 12:04 am  Comments (1)  

Ottawa Canada: Parliament Hill Protest Feb 14, 2021

I will be adding more if I can find any. I might even venture to the Ottawa Citizen to see what they have to say. That can wait until latter of course. So there will be updates.

Getting ready for the rally In Ottawa February 14, 2021

Compliments of  Patrick King from Alberta

The Ottawa Citizen was there

Rebel News was there

The speeches start a bit in, be patient.

I see other folks from Alberta made it there too  Right on.

Patrick King from Alberta Had a powerful speech.

There are some things about your Rights and Freedoms as well. In other words Laws.  Canadian Bill of Rights is important. So is the Nuremberg Code. Use that if anyone comes near you with the experimental vaccines. You are not a Lab Rat/Guinea Pig. You have the right to say no. I do not want to be part of any experiment.

Parliament Hill Protest Feb 14, 2021

Compliments of  Jason LaFreniere

A couple 15 year olds trying to make the sheep understand what’s really going on! Got to love those kids.

Robin Benedict live in Ottawa

The Virus has not been Isolated. That is true. There is a link to a post about that one below. Deloris Cahill was a speaker at the rally. Thee is also a former Police officer speaking.from Police on Guard for thee This is one video if you can download it, do so it will vanish. Youtube will not like it. The Censorship thing, you know.

KEVIN J JOHNSTON Ottawa Rally Valentine’s Day

Parliament Hill anti-lockdown protest attracts small but vociferous crowd

From the Ottawa Citizen

“We’re celebrating our freedom amongst Canadians with our First Nations, our English and or French,” said Kelly Anne Wolfe, CEO of Freedom Forum Canada, which organized the event, “and we want to end the lockdown.

Freedom Forum Canada

On Wednesday January 6 20/20 Waterloo Police Department we’re served with evidence pertaining to crime committed against the Canadian citizens by the lieutenant governor Elizabeth Dowdeswell And premier of Ontario Doug Ford. Lets hope the Police listen. They all should be investigating all across Canada. Add Fraud and a few other assorted things to that. Like Crimes against Humanity.

Mothers Against Distancing You also might want to download that video as well. It too just might vanish.

Two Petitions

Petition to remove PM Justin Trudeau, his Liberal government end the lockdown

As of February 16, 2021 —- 98,127 have signed Lets make that a few million.

We, the undersigned citizens of Canada, call upon the Governor General of Canada and/or House of Commons to dissolve Parliament and call a Federal Election. We, the undersigned citizens of Canada further demand that Justin Trudeau step down as Prime Minister AND as Leader of the Federal Liberal Party. We, the undersigned citizens of Canada have lost confidence in him as Canada’s Prime Minister and we feel he no longer serves the best interests of Canadians. His reckless disregard to preserve, protect and endorse the citizens of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, along with his current negligent spending of over $300 billion of our tax dollars to drag our economy into a depression, as well as for following the wrong and disastrous protocols of a privately owned corporation called the World Health Organization. The bottom line is indisputable….We, the undersigned citizens of Canada are casting our votes of No Confidence vote against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his liberal party until a new Federal Election to replace him. We also demand all Premiers remove all Provincial Emergency Acts in full immediately and restore all Canadians their rights as explained in the Canadian Charter of Rights. No exceptions!!!

Please sign and share. Surely Canada can get more then 1 million signatures as well. Go to the link below to sign

A Petition to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario: Lift the Lockdown!

WHEREAS the Lockdown imposed on Ontario by the Doug Ford Government is ineffective.

WHEREAS the Lockdown is having a catastrophic effect on the health, mental health, social and economic well-being of Ontarians.

WHEREAS the Government of Ontario must focus on protecting vulnerable populations in congregate living settings and Long Term Care homes.

WHEREAS it is imperative that Ontario’s healthcare services are fully restored immediately.

WHEREAS the Lockdown is causing a devastating toll on Ontario’s children.

WHEREAS Ontario’s children need to be back at school.

WE, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

That the Government of Ontario immediately Lift the Lockdown!

Go to the link below to sign.

PCR Tests are Worthless. They are not to be used for testing for any virus. Read the entire post.

Thousands have been injured by the vaccines and at this point at least a thousand or more have died.

No one has isolated the virus, Not even China.

Liberty Coalition Canada:
End the Lockdowns Caucus formed by Representatives from across Canada

There are a lot of lawsuits from around the world. Some finished some pending.

Covid Lawsuits against Governments and others

Drosten has some explaining to do. It might be fun to see him sitting in front of the Judge.

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.

The many Dangers of Lockdowns a must read

Corona Fake Pandemic: Italy Subjected to a Holy Inquisition of False Science

Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent a lot of Mask information there.

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

The Department of Homeland Security issued on Wednesday a nationwide terror alert lasting until April 30, Insanity at it’s finest hour

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud

WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce Massive COVID False Positives

Collateral Global

Published in: on February 15, 2021 at 6:54 pm  Comments Off on Ottawa Canada: Parliament Hill Protest Feb 14, 2021  
Tags: ,

Corona Fake Pandemic: Italy Subjected to a Holy Inquisition of False Science

By Global Research News

February 13, 2021

Italian Transcript below

Thank you, Mr President.

We have been spied on, subjugated, treated like criminals by a government that in two months has destroyed our fundamental, natural and constitutional rights. Parliament has been replaced by the various task forces that have de facto placed Italy in the hands of Commissions composed of lobby colleagues and international colleagues.

The ability of the old trick of media bombardment was used as a means of propaganda to condition the minds of Italians by leveraging their atavistic fear of dying and censoring anyone who dares to raise their heads and denounce these abuses.

You had to mask yourselves so that you would not be recognized by the Italians who know very well that you are responsible for this emergency. They are all in this room: the Centre-Right of the Venetian and Mantovan Twill Company, model 0, that in the last 10 years has cancelled 40% of the beds in intensive care, as well as the so-called Left that with its Zingaretti has been the perfect executor of the predatory neo-liberal policies of the last thirty years speculating as jackals, enriching private individuals waiting for the Guardia Finanza that evidently in these hours is already in the offices of the Giunta of Lazio.

Zingaretti, then, taking example from the Lombard vaccination campaign that caused the disasters that we are paying for today has well thought to impose it even in Lazio, knowing all the while that there is already ample evidence that influenza vaccinations have implications and in 40% of cases accounting for more viral interference — as if you did not know that coronavirus is correlated with indicators of other critical environmental pollution: First of all, also electromagnetic pollution with its harmful effects, and retarded consequences, because the construction of the antennas as well as those of major works from north and south of Italy have never stopped for Covid. One wonders why?

And so, in the midst of this Holy Inquisition of Scientism, we can sacrifice military personnel, policemen, medical personnel, our children, our elderly to the testing of a vaccine that we know — and even rocks know — will not help at all! On account of the evolving virus.

All obviously endorsed by this 5 Star Movement that we have seen even today is in full identity crisis but which remains attached to the skirts of the PD, by betraying all – I mean all the electoral promises – in exchange for a few comfy-chairs, too preoccupted with ites to Tallinn.

Closing colleagues: Nests of injustice in the Giusta of Lazio? Congratulations! If we weren’t in a democratic country we would think things were bad, but really bad!

All these DPCMs are unconstitutional. We know this very well: they are the symbol of authoritarianism from a mass-media health regime stained with the red blood of our natural constitutional rights far beyond those of April 25.

History does not forgive, President, and one day very soon you will have to explain why you have sacrificed Italy and our constitutional charter, submitting us to the geopolitical game beign played by the United States and China, letting this country become the territory of new wars, made indeed with the virus, and selling all our information, even the most private and intimate ones, to the highest bidder.

So I turn to you, Mr. President, and to the relator, Mrs. Lorenzin, who is already so dear to the Italian people, and I have a message from all the Italians who are not here, who want to show you what they will do with all these unconstitutional measures!

(the MP then shreds a copy of the #CuraItalia Law)

Session 331 of the Italian Camera, the lower house of Parliament

Prego collega, Grazie Presidente.

Ssiamo stati spiati, soggiogati, trattati come delinquenti da un governo che in due mesi ha distrutto i nostri diritti fondamentali naturali e costituzionali. Il parlamento si è fatto sostituire dalle varie task force che hanno commissariato di fatto l’italia alle lobby colleghi, internazionali colleghi.

L’abilità della stazione di fu del bombardamento mediatico sono stati usati come mezzi di propaganda per condizionare le menti degli italiani facendo leva sulla loro atavica paura di morire e censurando chiunque osi alzare la testa e denunciare questi abusi.

Vi siete dovuti mascherare per non farmi riconoscere dagli italiani che ben sanno che siete responsabili di questa emergenza. Ci sono tutti in questa aula: il centrodestra del modello azienda veneto 0 di saia e Mantuan che negli ultimi 10 anni ha cancellato il 40 per cento dei posti letto in terapia intensiva così come la cosiddetta sinistra che con il suo Zingaretti ha fatto da perfetto esecutore delle politiche neoliberiste predatorie degli ultimi trent’anni speculando come sciacalli arricchendo i privati in attesa della guardia di finanza che evidentemente in questi in queste ore è già negli uffici della Giunta Laziale.

Zingaretti poi prendendo esempio dalla campagna vaccinale Lombarda che ha causato i disastri che oggi paghiamo ha ben pensato di imporla anche nel Lazio pur sapendo che esistono già ampie evidenze che le vaccinazioni antinfluenzali porta colleghi e in 40 per cento dei casi covi di in più per interferenza virale come se non si sapesse che coronavirus a un cofattore quindi indicatori di altre criticità ambientali l’inquinamento: anzitutto anche quello elettromagnetico con i suoi effetti nocivi tardis colleghi perché i cantieri delle antenne come quelli anche delle grandi opere da nord e sud d’italia non si sono mai fermati per il Covid. Chissà come mai?

Ed allora nel pieno segue di questo scientismo della Santa Inquisizione da salotto televisivo si possono sacrificare il personale militare, i poliziotti, personale medico, i nostri figli, i nostri anziani alle sperimentazione di un vaccino che sappiamo e lo sanno anche i sassi non servirà a nulla per la punto evollezza del virus.

Il tutto ovviamente avallato da questo Movimento 5 Stelle che abbiamo visto anche oggi essere in piena crisi d’identità ma che resta attaccato alle sottane del PD tradendo tutte — dico tutte le promesse elettorali — in cambio di qualche poltrona, impegnato forse troppo legame di Tallinn.

Chiudere colleghi: neste ingiustizie levino nella Giunta Laziale. Ccomplimenti! Se non fossimo in un paese democratico ci sarebbe da pensare male ma veramente male!

Tutti questi DPCM sono incostituzionali. Lo sappiamo bene: sono il simbolo dell’autoritarismo dal regime sanitario mediatico smacchiato col rosso sangue dei nostri diritti naturali costituzionali altro che 25 aprile.

La storia non perdona, Presidente, ed un giorno molto presto dovete spiegare perché avete sacrificato l’Italia, la nostra carta costituzionale, sottomettendoci ai giochi nel geopolitici tra gli Stati Uniti e Cina, lasciando che questo paese divenisse territorio di nuove guerre fatto certamente con il virus, e svendendo tutte le nostre informazione, anche quelle più private e intime al miglior offerente.

E allora mi rivolgo a Lei, Presidente, e alla relatrice Lorenzin, tanto cara già al popolo Italiano, e ho un messaggio da parte di tutti Italiani che non ci stanno che vogliano farvi vedere cosa se ne faranno di tutti questi provvedimenti inconstituzionali! Source

Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

The Department of Homeland Security issued on Wednesday a nationwide terror alert lasting until April 30, Insanity at it’s finest hour

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Published in: on February 14, 2021 at 3:21 am  Comments Off on Corona Fake Pandemic: Italy Subjected to a Holy Inquisition of False Science  
Tags: ,

Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent

Trina Rose delivers evidence and a Message to BC Educators Feb 10, 2021

20 Reasons Mandatory Face Masks are Unsafe, Ineffective and Immoral

The COVID-19(84) Red Pill Posts | January 23, 2021 | John C. A. Manley

9 Potential and Proven Dangers to Muzzling Yourself

1. Cavities: New York dentists are reporting that half their patients are suffering decaying teeth, receding gum lines and seriously sour breath from wearing masks. “We’re seeing inflammation in people’s gums that have been healthy forever, and cavities in people who have never had them before,” Dr. Rob Ramondi told FOX News.

2. Facial Deformities: Masking children triggers mouth breathing which as been shown to cause “long, narrow faces, narrow mouths, high palatal vaults, dental malocclusion, gummy smiles, and many other unattractive facial features,” according to the Journal of General Dentistry.

3. Acne Vulgaris: Moisture and germs collecting in the mask cause “facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis… or worsening acne” (according to Public Health Ontario) which stresses the immune system, can lead to permanent scarring and has been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts (according to the Journal of Dermatologic Clinics). Children also develop impetigo, a bacterial infection that produces red sores and can lead to kidney damage (according to the Mayo Clinic).

4. Increased Risk of COVID-19: “Mask use by the general public could be associated with a theoretical elevated risk of COVID-19 through… self-contamination,” states Public Health Ontario in Wearing Masks in Public and COVID-19. “By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain,” theorizes nationally recognized board-certified neurosurgeon, Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD (in an article at The Centre for Research on Globalization).

5. Bacterial Pneumonia: At an Oklahoma Press Conference, Dr. James Meehan, MD testified: “Reports coming from my colleagues all over the world are suggesting that the bacterial pneumonias are on the rise” as a result of moisture collecting in face masks.

6. Immune Suppressing: Masks are often worn by criminals trying to hide their identity while perpetuating an offence (theft, violence, rape, murder, etc.). They produce subconscious anxiety and fear. Fear and anxiety activate the fight-or-flight nervous system which down-regulates the immune system, as shown in a study by the American Psychological Association.

7. Germophobia: Masks create an irrational fear of germs and a false sense of protection from disease, leading to antisocial (or even hostile) behaviour towards those not wearing a mask. (See the paper in the Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders titled “COVID-19, obsessive-compulsive disorder and invisible life forms that threaten the self”).

8. Toxic: Many (if not most) masks and face coverings (including cloth) are made with toxic and carcinogenic chemicals including fire retardant, fibreglass, lead, NFE, phthalates, polyfluorinated chemicals and formaldehyde that will outgas and be inhaled by the wearer. (See “5 main hazardous chemicals in clothing from China named” by Fashion United).

9. Psychologically Harmful: “I believe the real threat right now is what we’re doing to sabotage the mental, emotional and physical health of… our children, whose development is dependent on social interactions, physical contact and facial expressions,” writes Dr. Joseph Mercola of “Between mask wearing and social distancing, I fear the impact on children in particular may be long-term, if not permanent.”

6 Proofs Masks Do Not Reduce Infections

1. Insubstantial: A CDC-funded review on masking in May 2020 came to the conclusion: “Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza… None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group.” If masks can’t stop the regular flu, how can they stop SAR-CoV-2?

2. Unreasonable: “Evidence that masking as a source [of] control results in any material reduction in transmission was scant, anecdotal, and, in the overall, lacking… [and mandatory masking] is the exact opposite of being reasonable,” ruled a hospital arbitrator in a dispute between The Ontario Nurses’ Association and the Toronto Academic Health Science Network.

3. Ineffective: “Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections,” write Belgian medical doctors in an open letter published in The American Institute of Stress, September 24, 2020.

4. Unsanitary: “It has never been shown that wearing surgical face masks decreases postoperative wound infections,” writes Göran Tunevall, M.D. in the World Journal of Surgery. “On the contrary, a 50% decrease [in bacterial infection] has been reported after omitting face masks.”

5. No Protection: “There were 17 eligible studies.… None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection,” concludes a research review in the journal Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses.

6. Unproven: Dutch Minister for Medical Care, Tamara van Ark, asserted that “from a medical perspective there is no proven effectiveness of masks” after a review by the National Institute for Health on July 29, 2020 (according to Reuters).

5 Ways Forced Masking is Immoral

1. Reckless: “By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle,” writes Denis Rancourt, PhD in his 2020 paper Masks Don’t Work.

2. Manipulative: Dr. Andreas Voss, member of the World Health Organization expert team and head of microbiology at a Dutch hospital in Nijmegen, on July 24, 2020, told I Am Expat that masks were made mandatory “not because of scientific evidence, but because of political pressure and public opinion.”

3. Fear-Mongering: “In fact, there is no study to even suggest that it makes any sense for healthy individuals to wear masks in public,” write Drs. Karina Reiss, Phd and Dr. Sucharit Bakdi, MD in Corona, False Alarm? “One might suspect that the only political reason for enforcing the measure is to foster fear in the population.”

4. Totalitarian: “If you look at the history of totalitarian regimes… they all do the same thing, which is they try to crush culture, and crush any evidence of self-expression…” explains Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in an interview regarding face masks. “And what is the ultimate vector for self-expression? It’s your facial expressions…. [Yet] we’ve all been told to put on the burqa and be obedient.”

5. Virtue-Signalling: “Masks are utterly useless,” testified Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a pathologist, certified with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, at a city council meeting. “…masks are simply virtue-signalling… It’s utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people — I’m not saying that in a pejorative sense — walking around like lemmings, obeying without any knowledge base, to put the mask on their face.”

You can download, print and distribute a two-page printable handout of this article here. Special thanks to artist Allen Forest for use of his Masked Mona Lisa cartoon. Source

Will face masks cause facial deformities in children?

The COVID-19(84) Red Pill Posts | December 3, 2020 | John C. A. Manley

“When wearing a mask, most of us breathe with our upper chest muscles and with our mouth open,” states Children’s Minnesota on their website. While the hospital admits this can cause “increased stress and anxiety” there are other more long-lasting concerns.

According to a paper, in the peer-reviewed journal General Dentistry, “children’s whose mouth breathing is untreated” may develop the following deformities:

  • long, narrow faces
  • narrow mouths
  • high palatal vaults
  • misalignment between the teeth of the two dental arches
  • gummy smiles

As well as “many other unattractive facial features.”

Yet, how many children are being taught how to breathe while wearing a mask? Instead, many (if not most) are sucking in air through their mouth, as an instinctual reaction to the rise in carbon dioxide. This lowers the position of their tongue, which is key factor in normal facial development.

As the author of the paper, Dr. Yosh Jefferson, DMD, states: “If mouth breathing is treated early, its negative effect on facial and dental development and the medical and social problems associated with it can be reduced or averted.”

Instead, face masks may very well exacerbate the problem leading to a generation of deformed children. Because, it’s not just the mouth breathing. How will a growing face and two developing ears respond to a muzzle stretched around it for hours each day?

And, for what? There is no proof masks are effective at stopping infection. And, even if they were, children are practically immune from COVID-19 (a deadly disease that oddly focuses on old people who were on the verge of dying already).

But don’t worry, kids, if you grow up with an odd looking face all you have to do is… keep wearing your mask. No one will notice.

Facial deformities: Yet another reason to stop the masking madness. Source

Forcing a Child to Wear a Mask is Child Abuse

Joy, anger, fear, surprise, sadness, contempt, disgust. These basic building blocks of emotional experience are written all over our faces. Legendary psychologist Paul Ekman has devoted his life’s work to studying non-verbal emotional expression across cultures. His research suggests that we can largely recognize how people around the world are feeling by simply reading their faces. All of humanity expresses these seven core feelings in ways that we universally comprehend. We depend on facial expression to know and understand each other. With physical distancing, increased anxiety, and disrupted routines due to COVID19, we are primed to seek emotional connection by simply seeing each other’s facial expressions. Why a Mask is Not Just a Mask

Mask Harms in Kids: 68% of Parents Report Alarming Psychological and Physical Problems In First-of-its-kind Study

The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the
scientific evidence

Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

Published in: on February 14, 2021 at 2:37 am  Comments Off on Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent  

Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Anything in italics are Quotes from the News reports.

COVID-19 vaccine trials to include participants as young as 6 months

“In about 30 days, we’re going to start another trial that is six months to 17 years old, but that’s about 30 days away,” said Elizabeth Hoff, the executive director at DM Clinical.

So they want to use babies as lab rats, just to see how things go. Anyone who puts their child into one of those trials, does not deserve to be a parent.

The news tries to make it sound so warm and fuzzy, it is nauseating.

Kids need this vaccine for what purpose exactly. It is not to protect them or anyone else for that matter.  They could die or be maimed for life as well. Kids are not even affected by so called covid anyway. For everyone there is is over a 99% recovery rate, even if you think the virus is real.

Of course it has not been isolated. As noted by many. Even China has not isolated the so called virus. The PCR tests are useless. They were never meant to test for a virus. Again noted by many. Even Kary Mullis, who invented the bloody test. There are lawsuits over that as well. Some settled some pending.

There are 100, 12 to 17-year-olds participating in the Moderna adolescent trial through Houston Fights COVID. There are more trials coming, and the groups are now seeking participants as young as six months old.

Well those kids do not need the vaccines either.

COVID-19: Oxford vaccine to be tested on children as young as six in world-first trial

The trial conducted at Oxford University and its partner sites is the first to assess the jab’s efficacy in children aged 6-17.

13 February 2021 17:52, UK Children as young as six will be given the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine as part of a new clinical trial to test its efficacy in youngsters.

Researchers will use 300 volunteers to assess whether the coronavirus vaccine will produce a strong immune response in children aged between six and 17.

Professor Andrew Pollard, chief investigator on the Oxford vaccine trial, said: “While most children are relatively unaffected by coronavirus and are unlikely to become unwell with the infection, it is important to establish the safety and immune response to the vaccine in children and young people as some children may benefit from vaccination.

So what insanity makes them think, giving children or teens of any age, these horrid vaccines, is a good idea. With all those that have died already from the vaccines there is absolutely no benefit to giving children any of the vaccines. So call covid really does no harm to children. These people are  completely insane. Leave the kids alone. Let the professor be the lab rat and all his sick friends, who think this is a good idea.

All the vaccines will do for children, is make more of them die or get permanently disabled.  Experimenting on children is a massive, crime against humanity. These people need to be charged and thrown in jail. Experimenting on anyone is a crime against humanity.. Vaccine manufacturers have gotten away with killing and maiming to may people over the years. It is time to stop the madness. Vaccines are not safe. The covid vaccines do nothing to prevent the so called virus. All many of have seen, is the destruction of lives. Anyone, who promotes the vaccines also needs some jail time.

Anyone who thinks the vaccines are wonderful should be the very first to get them. Like the professor and his ilk. Thousands have already been injured or died.

No child can consent to any experimental drug or trial.

There is absolutely no benefit for any child, to get one of these dangerous experimental vaccines. The only benefit, is for the profits of the drug companies.

All So called Covid vaccines are experimental. I would not even call them a vaccine.

Every single person, who has gotten one, is just a Guinea pig/Lab rat.

They do not even pass the Nuremberg Code. Not one of them.

I am guessing many have not even read this. Well read it.

How many have said to people get the vaccine or loose your job?

Get the vaccine or you cannot fly?

How many have lied, about the safety of the vaccines?

How many governments are pushing the experimental vaccine?

How many were given the vaccine and were not told the truth, about all the side effects? DEATH being a big one.

Has anyone been told they are just a lab rat, that is being experimented upon?

I have to say there is very little informed consent. Even the press has lied about the safety of these vaccines, so they too are guilty.

I read the other day about a teachers union, wanting members to get vaccinated. They are guilty.

Many seniors, do not have the legal capacity, to consent to getting those vaccines.

Anyone giving them a vaccines is guilty. As for the rest, if they are not told the truth about all the side effects including death, those who administer the vaccines, are guilty as well.

And the list goes on.

No one has the right, to attempt to force, use coercion; or other wise con, anyone, to get one these vaccines.

To do so is a crime.

So how many criminals, are breaking the Nuremberg Code, do we have world wide?

This applies world wide. Read it. Print it out and give it to anyone, who is breaking the law. Share it with everyone you know.

The Nuremberg Code

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
    This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
    The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
    experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

JAB Kids with Covid Vaccines as fast as we can Say SAGE On BBC

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

The Department of Homeland Security issued on Wednesday a nationwide terror alert lasting until April 30, Insanity at it’s finest hour

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Published in: on February 13, 2021 at 8:04 pm  Comments (2)  
Tags: , ,

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

This is Thanks to Dr Robert Young. He found this research report.

They tested 44 vaccines – France and Italy. These are just a few things they found in the vaccines: Aluminum, Silicon, Barium, Tungsten, Platinum, Silver, Lead, Copper, Zirconium

New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination

Antonietta M Gatti,1,2 Stefano Montanari3

1National Council of Research of Italy, Institute for the Science and Technology of Ceramics, Italy
2International Clean Water Institute, USA
3Nanodiagnostics srl, Italy

Correspondence: Dr. Antonietta Gatti, National Council of Research of Italy, c/o Nanodiagnostics Via E. Fermi, 1/L, 41057 San Vito (MO), Italy, Tel 059798778

Received: November 30, 2016 | Published: January 23, 2017

Citation: Gatti AM, Montanari S (2016) New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 4(1): 00072. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2017.04.00072

Download PDF


Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

Keywords: Vaccine; Disease; Contamination; Protein corona; Biocompatibility; Toxicity; Nanoparticle; Immunogenicity; Foreign body; Environment; Industrial process; Quality control


Vaccines are one of the most notable inventions meant to protect people from infectious diseases. The practice of variolation is century-old and is mentioned in Chinese and Indian documents dated around 1000 A.D. Over time, variolation has been replaced by vaccination, vaccines have been enhanced as to technology, and the vaccination practice is now standardized worldwide.

Side effects have always been reported but in the latest years it seems that they have increased in number and seriousness, particularly in children as the American Academy of pediatrics reports [1,2]. For instance, the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) vaccine was linked to cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) [3]; measles-mumps-rubella vaccine with autism [4,5]; multiple immunizations with immune disorders [6]; hepatitis B vaccines with multiple sclerosis, etc.

The notice of Tripedia DTaP by Sanofi Pasteur reports “Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathia, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea”. The epidemiological studies carried out did not show a clear evidence of those associations, even if in 2011 the National Academy of Medicine (formerly, IOM) admitted: “Vaccines are not free from side effects, or adverse effects”[7].

Specific researches on components of the vaccines like adjuvants (in most instances, Aluminum salts) are already indicated as possible responsible of neurological symptoms [8-10] and in some cases, in-vivo tests and epidemiological studies demonstrated a possible correlation with neurological diseases [10,11]. Neurological damages induced in patients under hemodialysis treated with water containing Aluminum are reported in literature [12].

Recently, with the worldwide-adopted vaccines against Human Papillomavirus (HPV), the debate was reawaken due to some adverse effects reported by some young subjects.

Specific studies communicated the existence of symptoms related to never-described-before syndromes developed after the vaccine was administered. For instance, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) [13]. The side-effects that can arise within a relatively short time can be local or systemic.

Pain at the site of injection, swelling and uncontrollable movement of the hands (though this last symptom can also be considered systemic) are described. Among the systemic effects, fever, headache, irritability, epileptic seizures, temporary speech loss, lower limbs dysaesthesia and paresis, hot flashes, sleep disorders, hypersensitivity reactions, muscle pain, recurrent syncope, constant hunger, significant gait impairment, incapacity to maintain the orthostatic posture are reported [14].

It is a matter of fact that every day millions of vaccine doses are administered and nothing notable happens, but it is also irrefutable that, regardless of the amount of side effects that are not recorded and the percentage of which remains in fact unknown, in a limited number cases something wrong occurs. No satisfactory explanation or, in many cases, no explanation at all has been given and it seems that those adverse effects happen on a random and stochastic basis.

Those situations induced us to verify the safety of vaccines from a point of view which was never adopted before: not a biological, but a physical approach. So, we developed a new analysis method based on the use of a Field Emission Gun Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope investigations to detect possible physical contamination in those products.

Materials and Methods

44 types of vaccines coming from 2 countries (Italy and France) were analyzed. Table 1 groups them in terms of name, brand and purpose.

NNameBrand Name,  Country of DistributionDescriptionProduction Batch, Expiry Date
1Vivotif BernaBerna Biotech SA, ItalyAnti-Thyphoid Vaccine  (Live), group Ty21a3000336 [2004]
2Typhim ViAventis Pasteur MSD, ItalyAnti-Salmonella typhi VaccineU1510-2 [2004]
3TypherixGlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., ItalyAnti-Thypoid Vaccine  (polysaccharide Vi)ATYPB061BB [2009]
4AnatetallChiron (now Novartis) ItalyAdsorbed anti-Tetanus Vaccine030106 [2004]
5AnatetallNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, ItalyAdsorbed anti-Tetanus Vaccine060510 [2009]
6TetabulinBaxter AG, ItalyAdsorbed anti-Tetanus VaccineVNG2G006A [2009]
7Dif-Tet-AllNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, ItalyAdsorbed anti-Tetanus  and diphtheria Vaccine070501 [2009]
8InfanrixGlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., ItalyAnti-Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccineAC14B071AJ [2009]
9Infanrix hexaGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals s, ItalyAnti-diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type bA21CC512A [ 2017]
10Infanrix hexaGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals s. a.  FranceAnti-diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type bA21CC421A [ 2017]
11M-M-R vaxProSanofi Pasteur MSD, ItalyM-M-R vaxPro  (measles, mumps, and rubella) analyzed in CambridgeL012437 [ 2017]
12RepevaxSanofi Pasteur MSD, FranceAnti-diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-vaccineL0362-1 [2017]
13RepevaxSanofi Pasteur MSD SNC FranceAnti-diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-vaccineL0033-1 [2016]
14PriorixGlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., ItalyAnti–measles-mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccineA69CB550A [2009]
15MoruparChiron (now Novartis, ), ItalyAnti-measles- mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine7601 [2004]
16VarilrixGlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., ItalyAnti-Chicken pox vaccine (group OKA)A70CA567A [2009]
17Stamaril PasteurSanofi Pasteur MSD, Italyanti-yellow fever  vaccineA5329-6 [2009]
18Allergoid-Adsorbat 6-Graser Starke B.Allergopharma, GermanyAntiallergic vaccineCh-B.:30005999-B [2006]
19Engerix-BGlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., ItalyAdsorbed  anti-hepatitis B vaccineAHBVB468BD [2009]
20Prenevar 13Pfizer, ItalyAntipneumococcal vaccineG79324  [2013]
21Prevenar 13Pfizer, FranceAntipneumococcal vaccineN27430 [ 2018]
22Mencevax AcwyGlaxoSmithKline, Italyanti-Neisseria meningococcal group A, C, W135 and Y vaccineN402A47B 12 [2004]
23MeningitecPfizer, Italy(group C 10) (adsorbed on Al-Phosphate)H92709 [2015]
24MeningitecPfizer-ItalyAnti-meningococcus (group C 10) vaccine (adsorbed on Al-Phosphate)H20500 [2014]
25MeningitecPfizer-ItalyAnti-meningococcus vaccine sequestred by Procura della RepubblicaG76673 [2014]
26MeningitecPfizer-ItalyAnti-meningococcus vaccine sequestred by Procura della RepubblicaH99459 [2015]
27MeningitecPfizer-ItalyAnti-meningococcus vaccine sequestred by Procura della RepubblicaH52269 [2015]
28MenjugateNovartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAnti-meningococcus group  CYA0163AB [2010]
29MenveoNovartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAntimeningococcus groups A, C, W135, YA15083 [2017]
30MeningitecWyeth Pharmaceutical – FranceAnti-meningococcus group C vaccineE83920 [2011]
31Inflexal VBerna BiotechAnti-flu vaccine  2008/20093001463-01 [2009]
32VaxigripSanofi Pasteur MSDAnti-flu vaccine  2008/2009D9703-1 [2009]
33VaxigripSanofi PasteurAnti-flu vaccine 2012/2013J8401-1 [2013]
34VaxigripSanofi Pasteur, ItalyAnti-flu vaccine, with inactivated and split virusM7319-1 [2016]
35FocetriaNovartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAnti-pandemic flu H1N1 vaccine0902401 [2010]
36AgrippalNovartisAnti-flu vaccine 2012/2013127002A [2013]
37AgrippalNovartis vaccines, ItalyAnti-flu vaccine with inactivated and split virus 2015/2016 –152803 [2016]
38Agrippal S1Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAnti-flu inactivated/superficial antigene v –  2014/2015147302A [2015]
39FluarixGlaxoSmithKline – GSKAnti-flu vaccine  2013AFLUA789AA [2014]
40FluadNovartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAnti-flu inactivated/superficial antigene vaccine –  2014/2015142502 [2015]
41GardasilSanofi Pasteur MSD, ItalyAnti-HPV types 6,11,16,18 vaccineNP01250 [2012]
42GardasilSanofi Pasteur MSD, ItalyAnti-HPV (types 6,11,16,18) vaccineK023804 [2016]
43CervarixGlaxoSmithKline Biological, ItalyAnti-HPV (type 16,18)AHPVA238AX [2017]
44Feligen CRPVirbac S.A. – Carros – Italyanti-panleucopenia, infectious rhinotracheitis and infections by Calcivirus, veterinary Vaccine for cats3R4R [2013]

Table 1: List of vaccines analyzed, according to their purpose.

Some vaccines, in fact a minority, are meant to deal with a single bacterium or virus, while others are multi-valent. The list of vaccines we analyzed may contain repeated names, because we considered different batches and years of production of the same vaccine: the ones against influenza in particular.

The study was aimed at verifying a possible physical contamination. To do that, we performed a new kind of investigation based on observations under a Field Emission Gun Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope (FEG-ESEM, Quanta 200, FEI, The Netherlands) equipped with the X-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscope (EDS, EDAX, Mahwah, NJ, USA) to detect the possible presence of inorganic, particulate contaminants and identify their chemical composition.

A drop of about 20 microliter of vaccine is released from the syringe on a 25-mm-diameter cellulose filter (Millipore, USA), inside a flow cabinet. The filter is then deposited on an Aluminum stub covered with an adhesive carbon disc. The sample is immediately put inside a clean box in order to avoid any contamination and the box is re-opened only for the sample to be inserted inside the FEG-ESEM chamber. We selected that particular type of microscope as it allows to analyse watery and oily samples in low vacuum (from 10 to 130 Pa) at a high sensitivity.

When the water and saline the vaccine contains are evaporated, the biological/physical components emerge on the filter and it is then possible to observe them. This type of microscope (low-vacuum observations) prevents the possible sample contamination and the creation of artefacts. The observations are made with different sensors (SE: secondary-electron sensor and BSE: backscattered-electron sensor), and are performed at a pressure of 8.9 e-1 mbar, at energies ranging from 10 to 30kV to detect the particulate matter’s size, morphology and its elemental composition. The method identifies clearly inorganic bodies with a higher atomic density (looking whiter) than the biological substrate. So, organic entities are visible and easy to distinguish from inorganic ones. The method cannot distinguish between proteins and organic adjuvants (e.g. squalene, glutamate, proteins, etc.) or viruses, bacteria, bacteria’s DNA, endo-toxins and bacteria’s waste, but their comparatively low atomic density allows us to identify these entities as organic matter. In some vaccines, the organic matter contains white-looking debris named aggregates, while a high concentration or inorganic debris is called a cluster.

Single inorganic particles or organic-inorganic aggregates are identified, evaluated and counted. The counting procedure is repeated three times by three different operators, with an error lower than 10%. When a layer of salts (Sodium chloride or Aluminum) is detected, we record the situation but we do not do body count.


The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer. In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product (Table 2).

NCompanyNameAlluminumElements Identified
1Allergopharma – GermanyAllergoidyesAl
2Aventis Pasteur MSD Lyon – FrancieTyphim VinoBrKP, PbSi, FeCr, PbClSiTi
3Baxter AGTetabulinnoSiMg, Fe, SiTiAl, SBa, Zn
4Berna BiotechVivotif BernanoFeAl, ZrAlHf, SrAl, BiAlCl
5Berna BiotechInflexal VnoCuSnPbZn, Fe, CaSiAl, SiAl, NaPZn, ZnP, AlSiTi
6ChironAnatetallAl(OH)3FeAl, SZnBaAl
8GlaxoSmithKline- BelgiumMencevax ACWYnoFeCrNi, ZrAl, FeCrNiZrAlSi
9GlaxoSmithKlineInfanrixAl(OH)3Al, AlTi, AlSi
10GlaxoSmithKline BiologicalsInfanrix hexaAl(OH)3SBa, FeCu, SiAl, FeSi, CaMgSi, AlCaSi, Ti, Au, SCa, SiAlFeSnCuCrZn, CaAlSi
11GlaxoSmithKline BiologicalsInfanrix hexaAl(OH)3 ,AlPO4. 2H2OW, FeCrNi, Ti
12GlaxoSmithKlineTypherixnoTi, TiW, AlSiTiWCr, SBa, W, SiAl, AlSiTi
13GlaxoSmithKlinePriorixnoWCa, WFeCu, SiAl, SiMg, PbFe, Ti, WNiFe
14GlaxoSmithKlineEngerix-BnoAl (precipitates)
15GlaxoSmithKlineVarilrixnoFeZn, FeSi, AlSiFe, SiAlTiFe, MgSi, Ti, Zr, Bi
16GlaxoSmithKlineFluarixnoAlCu, Fe, AlBi, Si, SiZn, AlCuFe, SiMg, SBa, AlCuBi, FeCrNi, SPZn
17GlaxoSmithKline BiologicalsCervarixAl(OH)3AlSi,FeAl, SiMg,CaSiAl, CaZn, FeAlSi, FeCr, CuSnPb
18Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAnatetallAl(OH)3Al, FeCrNi, AlCr, AlFe, BaS, ZnAl
19Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsDif-Tet-AllAl(OH)3Fe,SBa, SiSBa, AlZnCu, AlZnFeCr
20Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsMenjugate kitAl(OH)3SiAl,Ti,FeZn, Fe, Sb, SiAlFeTi, W, Zr
21Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsFocetrianoFe, FeCrNiCu, FeCrNi, SiFeCrNi, Cr, SiAlFe, AlSiTiFe, AlSi, SiMgFe, Si, FeZn
22NovartisAgrippal S1noCa, Fe, SBa, SBaZn, Cr, Si, Pb, Bi, e FeSiAlCr, SiAlSBaFe, CaAlSi, Zn, CeFeTiNi, FeCrNi
23Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsAgrippal S1noSiAlK, Si, SiMgFe, CaSiAl, SBaZn
24Novartis vaccinesAgrippalnoCr, Ca, SiCaAl, ZrSi, SBa, CuZn, SCa
25Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics SFluadnoCaSiAl, FeSiTi,SiMgAlFe, SBa
26Novartis Vaccines and DiagnosticsMenveonoCaSiAl, SiAlFe, FeCrNi, Fe, Al, SBa
27PfizerPrenevar 13noFeCr
28PfizerPrevenar 13noW, CaAlSi, Al, CaSiAlFe, FeS, FeCr, FeCrNi, Fe, , CaP, FeTiMn, Ba, SiMgAlFe
29PfizerMeningitec – ctrlnoCr, Si
30PfizerMeningitec – ctrlnoFeCrNi, W
31PfizerMeningitecnoCaSiAl, CaSi, SiAlFeTi, FeCrNi, W, Fe, Pb
32PfizerMeningitecnoCr (precipitates), Ca, AlSi
33PfizerMeningitecnoW, SiCa, CaSi, Pb, FeCrNi, Cr
34Wyeth Pharmaceutical – UKMeningitecnoSiAlFe, SiAlTi, SiMgFe, W, Fe, Zr, Pb, Ca, Zn, FeCrNi
35Sanofi Pasteur MSD-FranceVaxigripnoFe, FeCrNi, SiAlFe, AlSi, SiAlFeCr
36Sanofi Pasteur MSDStamaril PasteurnoCaSiAl, AlSi, Fe, SiMgFe, SiMgAlFe, CrSiFeCr, CrSiCuFe
37Sanofi Pasteur MSDGardasilAlPO4. 2H2OAlCuFe, PbBi, Pb, Bi, Fe
38Sanifi Pasteur MSDGardasilAlPO4. 2H2OCaAlSi, AlSi, SiMgFe, Al,Fe, AlCuFe, FeSiAl, BiBaS, Ti, TiAlSi
39Sanofi PasteurVaxigripnoCa, CrFe, FeCrNi, CaSZn, CaSiAlTiFe, Ag, Fe
40Sanofi PasteurVaxigripnoSiMgFe, CaSiAl, AlSiFe, AlSi,FeCr, FeZn, Fe
41Sanofi Pasteur MSDRepevaxAlPO4 .2H2OBi, Fe, AlSiFe, SiMg, SBa, Ca
42Sanofi Pasteur MSD SRepevaxAlPO4.2H2OTi, Br, AuCuZn, Ca, SiZn, SiAuAgCu, SiMgFe,FeCrNi.AlSiMgTiMnCrFe, SiFeCrNi, FeAl
43Sanofi Pasteur MSDM-M-R vaxPronoSi, SiFeCrNi, FeCrNi,FeNi, Fe, SCa, AlSiCa, CaAlSiFeV, SBa, Pt, PtAgBiFeCr
44Virbac S.A. – Carros – FranceFeligen CRPnoCa,SiAl

Table 2: List of the vaccines according to their manufacturers with the chemical composition of the debris identified in each sample. The elements most represented are reported.

Figure 1a shows a layer of crystals of Sodium chloride (NaCl) embedding salts of Aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) in a drop of Gardasil (anti-HPV vaccine by Merck) as the EDS spectrum (Figure 1b) shows. Saline is the fluid base to any vaccine preparation and Aluminum salts or Aluminum hydroxide [Al(OH)3] are the adjuvants which are usually added.

Looking at the area outside these precipitates but inside the liquid drop, we identified other things: single particles, clusters of particles and aggregates (organic-inorganic composites) that are due to an interaction of the inorganic particulate matter with the organic part of the vaccine.Figure 1: Crystals of saline solution and Aluminum Phosphate and corresponding EDS spectra.

Figure 2a-2f shows the different typology of entities identified in the vaccines (Repevax, Prevenar and Gardasil); single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) and aggregates with their EDS spectra (Figure 2d-2f). The images (Figure 2a & 2d) show debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles (Figure 2b & 2e) arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum -Copper debris (Figure 2c & 2f) in an aggregate.Figure 2: Images of single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) andaggregates with their EDS spectra. They are respectively composed of (a,b) Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium, Titanium, Chromium, Manganese, Iron, (c,d) Iron, Silicon, Calcium Titanium, Chromium, (e,f) Aluminum, Copper. The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

As can be seen, the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).

Figure 3a-3d show particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).Figure 3: Images of Tungsten particles identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix. They are composed respectively of Tungsten, Aluminum, Iron but in different concentrations. The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

Figure 4a-4d present singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).Figure 4: Images show examples of nano biointeraction. The aggregate (a,b) identified in Gardasil contains nanoparticles of Chlorine, Silicon, Aluminum, Zirconium, while the debris found in Repevax contains Silicon, Gold, Silver (c,d). The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction [6] occurs and a “protein corona” is formed [7-10]. The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.

Figure 5a-5f show examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec, (Figure 5a & 5b) of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel, Figure 5c & 5d) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix (Figure 5e & 5f). Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature. Figure 5: show particles surrounded by an organic compound. They are composed of Lead (a,b), Iron, Chromium, Nickel (stainless steel; c,d), Copper, Tin, Lead (e,f). The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

The link between these two entities generates an unfolding of the proteins that can induce an autoimmune effect once those proteins are injected into humans.

Figure 6a & 6b show one of the foreign bodies identified in Agrippal. The particle is composed of Cerium, Iron, Titanium and Nickel. (Figure 7a & 7b)present an area of Repevax where the morphology of red cells – we cannot tell whether they are human or animal- is clearly visible. Figure 6: show an organic aggregate containing a debris made of Cerium, Iron, Nickel, Titanium. The red arrow indicates the organic layer (less atomically dense) that covers the Cerium particle. Figure 7: Image of an area in a Repevax drop where the morphology of red cells (red arrows) were identified. It is impossible to know whether they are human or animal origin. Among the debris of saline and Aluminum phosphate, there is the presence of debris (white arrows) composed of Aluminum, Bromine, Silicon, Potassium, Titanium.

Table 3 summarizes the number and morphology of the debris identified, in term of single particles, clusters of particles or aggregates (organic-inorganic compounds), while Figure 8shows the graph obtained calculating the total number of particles (particles plus clusters plus aggregates) identified for 20 microl of every vaccine.

NameTotal Debris n.Size Range in mmCluster n.Size Range in mmAggregate n.(Range of Particles)Size Range mm
AllergoidNaCl precipitates/////
Typhim Vi3940,1-2,53[9-350]2-35
Vivotif Berna41,5-15
Inflexal V1030,1-171203[35-45]10-25
Mencevax ACWY130,2-5
Infanrix hexa18210,1-1515[1820]20-140
Infanrix hexa1620,3-712602[7 debris]3.5-44
Varilrix27230,1-436 [120-2000]15-40
Agrippal S14300,2-6130.2-805[410]20
Agrippal S110290,1-129[1025]35-80
Agrippal4800,1-611[ 460]2-80
Fluad6050,2-15412-256[ 600]70
Menveo4520,1-134[430 ]30-110
Prenevar 13precipitates + 5 debris1-7
Prevenar 13precipitates + 81 debris0,2-5035-401 [60]25
Meningitecprecipitates + 400,1-3,52[40]25-70
Stamaril Pasteur1520,1-725-73[145]4-20
M-M-R vaxPro930,1-152[50]Oct-15
Feligen CRP920,1-121121 (40 debris)25

Table 3: List of the debris’ number identified in each vaccine as single particle, clusters and aggregates. Characterization is made by shape, size range and variability of the number of particles counted in each aggregate [in brackets]. Figure 8: Graph of the debris’ quantities identified in a 20 microl drop of every vaccine.

Similar aggregates were already described by other scientists who identified them in the blood e.g. in leukemic patients [15] and in subjects affected by cryoglobulinemia [16].

Not all the vaccines analyzed contain the same contamination, though the same vaccine belonging to different batches and, in some cases, coming from different countries can contain a similar contamination (e.g. the vaccines by Glaxo Infarix, Typherix and Priorix contain Tungsten. Tungsten was also identified in Menjugate kit by Novartis, and Prevenar, Meningitec by Pfizer and Meningitec by Wyeth).]

Feligen, the only veterinary vaccine tested, proved to be the only sample free from inorganic contamination, while Allergoid generates a layer of inorganic salts so thick that it does not allow to detect other particulate contaminants.


The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies. For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction.

After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas [17]. But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination. We believe that in many cases they get distributed throughout the body without causing any visible reaction, but it is also likely that, in some circumstances, they reach some organ, none excluded and including the microbiota, in a fair quantity. As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect (due to a nano-bio-interaction [18]) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way [19-22]. It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].

In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues [24-26].

The detection of presence of Aluminum and NaCl salts is obvious as they are substances used by the Producers and declared as components, but other materials are not supposed to be in the vaccine or in any other injectable drug, at that, and, in any case, Aluminum has already been linked with neurological diseases [27-29].

Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles, due an extravasation from the blood, could heavily impair the muscle functionality [30,31].

We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants.

Other forms of so-far unknown contaminations have recently been observed and, in any case, vaccines contain components that could themselves be the cause of adverse effects. It is a well-known fact in toxicology that contaminants exert a mutual, synergic effect, and as the number of contaminants increases, the effects grow less and less predictable. The more so when some substances are unknown.

As a matter of fact, no exhaustive and reliable official data exist on the side-effects induced by vaccines. The episodic evidence reported by people allegedly damaged by vaccines is twofold: some say the damage occurred and became visible within a few hours from administration, and some maintain that it was a matter of some weeks. Though we have no indisputable evidence as to the reliability of those attestations, we can put forward a hypothesis to explain the different phenomena. In the former case, the pollutants contained in the drug have reached the brain and, depending on the anatomical site interested, have induced a reaction. If that is the case, the whole phenomenon is very rapid. In the latter circumstance, the pollutants reached the microbiota, thus interfering with the production of enzymes necessary to carry out neurological functions [32-35]. That possibility takes time, as it involves the production of chemical compounds in a sufficient quantity, and an elapse of some weeks between injection and clinical evidence is reasonable. Of course, ours is no more than a hypothesis open to discussion and in need of proof, hoping that a chance of further investigation is allowed.


The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.

A further purification of the vaccines could improve their quality and could probably decrease the number and seriousness of the adverse incidental effects.


The Authors are indebted to Dr. Federico Capitani, Dr. Laura Valentini and Ms. Lavinia Nitu for their technical assistance. The opinions and conclusions are not necessarily those of the Institution.


  1. Healthy
  2. US Dpt of health and human services (1996) Report Update: Vaccine Side Effects, Adverse Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions. CDC 45(RR-12): 1-35.
  3. Ottaviani G, Lavezzi AM, Matturri L (2006) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Arch 448(1): 100-104.
  4. Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington CP, Petropoulos MC, Favot-Mayaud I, et al. (1999) Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet 353(9169): 2026-2029.
  5. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C (2012) Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2): CD004407.
  6. Carola Bardage, Ingemar Persson, Åke Örtqvist, Ulf Bergman, Jonas F Ludvigsson, et al. (2011) Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with a monovalent adjuvanted vaccine: population based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden. BMJ 343: d5956.
  7. Johann Liang R (2012) Updating the Vaccine Injury Table following the 2011 IOM Report on Adverse Effects of vaccines. HRSA, pp. 1-27.
  8. L Tomljenovic, CA Shaw (2011) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? Current Medicinal Chemistry 18(17): 2630-2637.
  9. Shaw CA, Petrik MS (2009) Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem 103(11): 1555-1562.
  10. Authier FJ, Sauvat S, Christov C, Chariot P, Raisbeck G, et al. (2006) AlOH3-adjuvanted vaccine-induced macrophagic myofasciitis in rats is influenced by the genetic background. Neuromuscul Disord 16(5): 347-352.
  11. Exley C, Esiri MM (2006) Severe cerebral congophilic angiopathy coincident with increased brain aluminium in a resident of Camelford, Cornwall, UK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(7): 877-879.
  12. Wills MR, Savory J (1985) Water content of aluminium, dialysis dementia, and osteomalacia. Environ Health Perspect 63: 141-147.
  13. Brinth L, Pors K, Theibel AC, Mehlsen J (2015) Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine. Danish Medical J 62(4): 1-12.
  14. Palmieri B, Poddighe D, Vadalà M, Laurino C, Carnovale C, et al. (2016) Severe somatoform and dysautonomic syndromes after HPV vaccination: case series and review of literature. Immunol Res.
  15. Visani G, Manti A, Valentini L, Canonico B, Loscocco F, et al. (2016) Environmental nanoparticles are significantly over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 50: 50-56.
  16. Artoni E, Sighinolfi GL, Gatti AM, Sebastiani M, Colaci M, et al. (2016) Micro and nanoparticles as possible pathogenetic co-factors in mixed cryoglobulinemia. Occupational Medicine.
  17. T Hansen, L Klimek, F Bittinger, I Hansen, A Gatti, et al. (2008) Mast cell reiches Aluminium granuloma Pathologe 29(4): 311-313.
  18. Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.
  19. Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S, Wlodarski A, Kuharev J, et al. (2011) Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5(9): 7155-167.
  20. Radauer Preiml , Andosch A, Hawranek T, Luetz-Meindl U, Wiederstein M, et al. (2015) Nanoparticle-allergen interactions mediate human allergic responses: protein corona characterization and cellular responses. Fibre toxicology 13: 3.
  21. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggård T, Thulin E, et al. (2016) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. PNAS 104 (7): 2050-2055.
  22. Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, et al. (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 134-135: 167-174.
  23. Gatti AM, Quaglino D, Sighinolfi GL (2009) A Morphological Approach to Monitor the Nanoparticle-Cell Interaction. International Journal of Imaging and Robotics 2: 2-21.
  24. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO (1994) Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 76(9): 1345-1359.
  25. Kirkpatrick CJ, Barth S, Gerdes T, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Peters (K 2002) Pathomechanisms of impaired wound healing by metallic corrosion products. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6(3): 183-190.
  26. Lee SH, Brennan FR, Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Ragasa DR, et al. (1997) Human monocyte/macrophage response to cobalt-chromium corrosion products and titanium particles in patients with total joint replacements. J Orthop Res 15(1): 40-49.
  27. Shaw CA, Seneff S, Kette SD, Tomljenovic L, Oller Jr JW, et al. (2014) Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease. Journal of Toxicology 2014: 491316.
  28. Shaw CA, Kette SD, Davidson RM, Seneff S (2013) Aluminum™s Role in CNS-immune System Interactions leading to Neurological Disorders. Immunome Research 9: 069.
  29. Seneff S, Swanson N, Chen Li (2015) Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease. Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 42-70.
  30. Pegaz B, Debefve E, Ballini JP, Konan-Kouakou YN, van den Bergh HJ (2006) Effect of nanoparticle size on the extravasations and the photothrombic activity of meso(p-tetracarboxyphenyl)porphyrin. J Photochem Photobiol B 85(3): 216-222.
  31. Brinth LS, Pors K, Hoppe AG, Badreldin I, Mehlsen J (2015) Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis a Relevant Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Side Effects to Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine? International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination 1(1):1-5.
  32. Moos WH, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, et al. (2016) Microbiota and Neurological Disorders: A Gut Feeling. Biores Open Access 5(1): 137-145.
  33. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Caetano L, Antunes M, Brett (2010) Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiological Rev 90(3): 859-904.
  34. Umbrello G, Esposito S (2016) Microbiota and neurologic diseases: potential effects of probiotics. J Transl Med 14(1): 298.
  35. Kinoshita T, Abe RT, Hineno A, Tsunekawa K, Nakane S, et al. (2014) Peripheral sympathetic nerve dysfunction in adolescent Japanese girls following immunization with the human papillomavirus vaccine. Intern Med 53(19): 2185-2200.

Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Gatti, et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially. Source

Periodic Table of Elements Just in case you need to double check any of the Elements in the Vaccines.

Glyphosate has been found in vaccines as well. Add metals to vaccines and that is a major problem.

Glyphosate and How to Detox It with Dr. Stephanie Seneff

Just in case the video is removed from Youtube as many are these days.

Glyphosate Herbicide and How to Detox It with Dr. Stephanie Seneff

The Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study!

Contents of immunizing agents available for use in Canada: Canadian Immunization Guide Lots of garbage in vaccines used in Canada.

For more information on Vaccines and their dangers

Vaccines in Canada Prompted by WHO

Experimenting with Covid vaccines on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Published in: on February 12, 2021 at 5:45 pm  Comments Off on Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines  
Tags: , ,

The Department of Homeland Security issued on Wednesday a nationwide terror alert lasting until April 30, Insanity at it’s finest hour

We are all Terrorists now.

Feb 3, 2021

The language used in this alert suggests that millions of Americans are potential terrorists. Second Amendment supporting, antiwar, anti-tax, anti-politics, anti-militarization, pro-life, and anti-Federal Reserve activists certainly have “objections to the exercise of government authority.” They are certainly viewed by the political class and its handmaidens in big tech and the mainstream media as ideological extremists. Anyone who gets his news from sources other than mainstream media or big tech, or who uses certain “unapproved” social media platforms, is considered to have had his grievances “fueled by false narratives.” For something to be considered a false narrative, it need only contradict the “official” narrative.

The alert warns of potential terrorist attacks from Americans who are “ideologically motivated” and have “objections to the exercise of government authority and the presidential transition, as well as other perceived grievances fueled by false narratives.”

Apparently Ron Paul has been banned from Facebook. You might want to download the video from youtube as they will go after him there as well, like they have so many others. Now the Big tech is way out of control as we all have noticed over the past year or more actually. I can see them going after Ron he stands up against many thing and has for years.

Facebook would hate this one for sure.

From Feb 2, 2021 A couple of Quotes From Ron Paul

Now I understand that many who support Lockdown will object to my characterisation of their position. They will say that it is deliberately misleading, since it talks about healthy people, and does not mention the sick. Such objections founder, however, on this undeniable fact: Lockdowns are, by their nature, an entirely untargeted and indiscriminate approach to a health issue, and the prohibiting by law of millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people is a feature, not a bug of a policy that was untried and untested before it was first implemented by the Chinese Communist Party in January last year, then copied by many Governments around the world thereafter.

For some reason, many Lockdownists seem to think that the onus is on Lockdown opponents to disprove their position. But as Dr Malcolm Kendrick points out in his excellent piece – Does Lockdown Work or Not, this is the opposite of how things are supposed to work:

The starting point, for any scientific hypothesis, is for the proponents to disprove the null hypothesis. Demanding that those who believe something may not work, to prove that it doesn’t, is to turn the scientific method upside down. You can never prove a negative. Even so, he goes on to point out that most of the countries with the highest deaths per million are those which had fairly stringent Lockdowns, and therefore the data so far most certainly does not show that Lockdowns are effective, even on their own terms.

From March 2020

Governments love crises because when the people are fearful they are more willing to give up freedoms for promises that the government will take care of them. After 9/11, for example, Americans accepted the near-total destruction of their civil liberties in the PATRIOT Act’s hollow promises of security.

Governments love crises because when the people are fearful they are more willing to give up freedoms for promises that the government will take care of them. After 9/11, for example, Americans accepted the near-total destruction of their civil liberties in the PATRIOT Act’s hollow promises of security. This part is all to interesting. The madness over the coronavirus is not limited to politicians and the medical community. The head of the neoconservative Atlantic Council wrote an editorial this week urging NATO to pass an Article 5 declaration of war against the COVID-19 virus! Are they going to send in tanks and drones to wipe out these microscopic enemies?

I have a lot of respect for Ron. Congressman from Texas. He was one of the best politicians that was in the US. He actually suffered from a thing called intelligence. He represented his people, not corporations.
Ronald Ernest Paul (born August 20, 1935) is an American author, physician, and retired politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas’s 22nd congressional district from 1976 to 1977 and again from 1979 to 1985, and for Texas’s 14th congressional district from 1997 to 2013. On three occasions, he sought the presidency of the United States: as the Libertarian Party nominee in 1988 and as a candidate in the Republican primaries of 2008 and 2012. A self-described constitutionalist, Paul is a critic of the federal government’s fiscal policies, especially the existence of the Federal Reserve and the tax policy, as well as the military–industrial complex, the war on drugs, and the war on terror. He has also been a vocal critic of mass surveillance policies such as the USA PATRIOT Act and the NSA surveillance programs.
He called global warming a hoax in a 2009
He also opposes federal government influenza inoculation programs. The Drug companies and lobby groups would hate that oneand the WHO would not like that one either.
He is an outspoken proponent of increased ballot access for third-party candidates.
In June 2013, Paul criticized the NSA surveillance program and praised Edward Snowden for having performed a “great service to the American people by exposing the truth about what our government is doing in secret”
Ron voted for Rights to Medical Marijuana Act (H.R. 2592), a bill introduced to permit states to allow the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.

From 1999 until his retirement, he introduced bills into each Congress seeking to eliminate the Federal Reserve.
Ron Paul wanted the Federal Reserve audited for years. A Private Bankers nightmare. It really needs to be audited more them once every 99 years of course.

Big Tech behaves as if they’re the new rulers of the world, and they need to be stopped. At last, the pushback has begun

2 Feb, 2021

Laura Loomer is an award-winning conservative investigative journalist, free-speech activist, and former Republican US congressional nominee in Florida’s 21st District. She is the author of “LOOMERED: How I Became the Most Banned Woman in the World.” Follow her on Gab and Parler @LauraLoomer, and on Telegram @loomeredofficial

Facebook & Twitter etc. think they can decide which politicians win and which lose. Florida governor Ron DeSantis’ new plan to fine these companies if they censor candidates is good, but the policies need to go further.

The growing trend of Big Tech tyranny by companies like Facebook and Twitter has made one thing clear: These companies, thanks to their wealth, and the enormous influence they wield regarding the flow of information and global communication, are now more powerful than most countries. In fact, Facebook is now more powerful than any elected body or representative – including the president of the United States.

Although Facebook has been practicing forms of political censorship for years, its monopolistic power and threat to election integrity means the very concept and existence of sovereign democratic nations whose leaders are elected by the people has been completely undermined following the contentious 2020 US presidential election. 

This week, Project Veritas, where I previously worked as an undercover journalist, released a new series of undercover videos from a Facebook insider which caught company executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, admitting that they have too much power, with the banning of ex-president Trump used as an example.

Former UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, Facebook’s vice president of global affairs, was also caught on hidden camera acknowledging that many world leaders have spoken out against the company’s decision to ban Trump’s account following the Capitol protest on January 6. Clegg said Facebook’s critics say “this shows that private companies have got too much power and they should be only making these decisions in a way that is framed by democratically agreed rules.”

We agree with that, we agree with that,” Clegg claimed. “Mark [Zuckerberg] could be very clear about that, that ideally, we wouldn’t be taking these decisions on our own. We would be taking these decisions in line with a conformity, with democratically agreed rules and principles. And at the moment, those democratically elect, democratically agreed rules don’t exist. We still have to take positions in real time.”

Except he’s wrong about democratically agreed rules not existing. Here in the US, the rules are inscribed within our Constitution. It’s called the First Amendment, and as an American company, Facebook should be respecting the Constitution and its protection of political speech. 

Trump was one of the most powerful people in the world. He also happened to be one of the most popular social media users in the world, prior to his bans by Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. His bannings served as a wakeup call reminding leaders from all nations around the world that if Big Tech can silence the leader of the free world both during and after his election, what’s stopping Big Tech from silencing them? What is the point of having elections and sovereign nations if Big Tech is now assuming the role of picking and choosing election winners and losers?

Big Tech’s overreaching power and ability to sabotage diplomatic relations and election integrity is the most pressing issue facing the world, and it’s an issue that all world leaders who care about free and fair elections should unite to address unless they want to live under a one-world global technocracy. 

It’s also a national security risk when Big Tech deems a president of the United States too dangerous to have an account, while allowing for genocidal dictators like Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to tweet death threats against Trump and Israel. By banning Trump, Big Tech prevented the leader of the free world from responding to a threat of assassination from a hostile nation.

One of the main ways Facebook and Twitter justified their political censorship following the 2016 US presidential election was by falsely accusing conservative accounts of being “Russian bots,” despite the fact that the Mueller Report later proved that there was no Russian interference in the election. America and the world have seen through Big Tech’s actions, and now these undercover videos published by Project Veritas confirm that Big Tech is nothing more than a weaponized propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.

Along with banning Donald Trump, here are some other examples of how Big Tech is undermining sovereign nations and election integrity throughout the world. 

In August 2020, India’s Congress and India’s Communications Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad penned a letter to Zuckerberg accusing Facebook of interfering in India’s elections by practicing anti-right wing bias through censorship of right-wing posts as “hate speech.” In the letter, Prasad claimed that ahead of the 2019 elections, there was “a concerted effort by Facebook… to not just delete pages or substantially reduce their reach but also offer no recourse or right of appeal to affected people who are supportive of right-of-center ideology. This interference in India’s political process through gossip, whispers and innuendo is condemnable.” 

Sound familiar?

Following the ban on Trump, Mexican president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador called the Facebook CEO “arrogant” for thinking he had the power and the right to ban the leader of the free world. He argued that it was a “bad sign” that companies like Facebook and Twitter could censor political opinions. “I felt he was very self-important and very arrogant. A court of censorship like the Inquisition to manage public opinion. This is really serious,” Lopez Obrador said. 

In Uganda, during its recent presidential election, Facebook was caught deleting accounts and pages in support of the sitting president, Yoweri Museveni. In response to this interference, Museveni accused Facebook of blocking messages sent by his ruling National Resistance Movement. “Why would anyone do that?” he said. “I told my people to close it. If it is to operate in Uganda, it should be used equitably. There is no way anybody can come [here] and play around with our country and decide who is good [and] who is bad.”

So President Museveni banned Facebook from his country.

Bravo! This is the same response that needs to be implemented by leaders all around the world if they are to combat Facebook’s power grab. It is no longer a conspiracy to say the company has far too much power, especially since its executives have admitted it themselves. If Facebook is going to disrespect election integrity by banning political accounts it doesn’t agree with, then Facebook itself must be banned from operating in various countries. 

Uganda’s approach is the correct one for dealing with Big Tech so long as world leaders care about being elected by voters, and not chosen by Big tech overlords. 

As a candidate for Congress in Florida’s 21st Congressional District, home to former president Trump, I experienced this election interference first hand. Because Facebook didn’t like me and my policies, they refused to allow my campaign to have an account. As a result, I was the only federal candidate in US history to be denied access to social media accounts, which definitely harmed my ability to raise money and reach voters. Just as the president of Uganda said, Facebook is inserting itself into elections and choosing who is good and who is bad. Good and bad are subjective terms that should be left for the voters to distinguish and decide. 

I wrote all the words above before today’s welcomed crackdown on Big Tech by Ron DeSantis, Florida’s governor. He called the “content moderation” that tech companies do “political manipulation,” and announced plans to fine them $100,000 a day for each day a candidate is deplatformed. 

It is a brave, sensible and principled stand against tech tyranny, and as the first deplatformed candidate in United States history, with a congressional campaign in Florida, I hope my campaign against Big Tech’s censorship helped inspire it. My treatment at the hands of the Big Tech tyrants exposed first hand how Big Tech is picking and choosing election winners and losers and how their deplatforming of my campaign is a direct violation of Federal Election Commission rules, as giving one candidate platform access while denying their opponent access is an illegal in-kind contribution.

In fact, I would urge leaders like DeSantis to go even further in their crackdown on Big Tech.  

Big Tech and the Democrats love virtue signaling about fake news and foreign election interference, but it’s a classic case of projection, because spreading fake news and interfering in democratic elections is exactly what they are guilty of doing.

World leaders must unite with a firm hand to immediately halt Big Tech’s practice of having zero accountability and reporting to no one. If Big Tech and their rogue band of leftist Silicon Valley billionaires – including Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai, Jeff Bezos, and Bill Gates (all of whom are outspoken Trump critics and Democrat Party megadonors) – aren’t vigorously resisted by governments, then the world will inevitably fall and sovereign nations will find themselves under the control of one giant corporate power: Big Tech Technocracy. 

There is only one solution and one way forward. People from all creeds and nationalities should unite and take a decisive step for the sake of protecting free speech, free markets, and free and fair elections going forward: Ban Big Tech! Source

When they ban those, who tell the truth, that is a massive problem.

Deaths and injuries due to Covid vaccines, The numbers are growing. India also has a growing number as well.

Thousands had side effects from Covid Vaccine

Published in: on February 3, 2021 at 11:03 am  Comments (1)  

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Update March 2, 2021

Canada’s Quarantine Hotels Backfire as People Starved Some video of angry people included

Update February 26, 2021

Man misses cancer treatment after being forced to quarantine

Essential oilpatch worker wrongly denied exemption, forced into quarantine hotel

Sheila Gunn Reid tells the story of an essential worker who was forced to stay in a COVID quarantine hotel, despite having an exemption letter from the Alberta government.

This Montreal man walked out of a quarantine hotel

David Menzies speaks to Shmarya Plotkin, a man who left a Montreal, Quebec quarantine hotel after he was held there against his will upon his return to Canada following a business trip to the U.S.

Strike At Quarantine Hotel Hell: Sexually Assaulted & Fired, This Is OUTRAGEOUS!!!

Dan Dicks of Press For Truth

Links to the News reports from Dan

This is going to far. This must be stopped. This is not protecting anyone.

Update February 24, 2021

Woman sexually assaulted at Trudeau airport COVID facility after CBSA reject her negative test

According to La Presse, a woman, who identified herself simply as “Sarah,” left her government room where she bumped into 29-year-old Robert Shakory, who then allegedly sexually assaulted her.

Sarah had also provided a negative test, though the CBSA rejected it, forcing her into the facility or otherwise facing a fine.

Shakory, originally of Windsor, Ontario, was arrested and charged by local police. Source

She is a double victim. How sick the world has become.

The last video on this one says a lot. Even the Police or former Police officers are coming out to say no more to this. Canada and the world needs a lot more people, to stand up and say No to all of this.

Ottawa Canada: Parliament Hill Protest Feb 14, 2021

Lawyers are banding together around the world now, to fight against all of this. The PCR test is worthless, the virus has not been Isolated not even by China.

Reiner Fuellmich With Other German Lawyers Class Action

Now they want to experiment on babies and little children with the deadly experimental vaccines.

They will just haul you off to jail or forced isolation. Even if you test negative.

Victim number 1

Pastor Chris Mathis speaks out on the traumatic and shocking mandatory quarantine of his wife Nikki, upon arrival at the Calgary Airport, even with a “negative” covid test prior to arrival. She was told she would be arrested, if she resisted. Her husband was told he could not know the location or the names of the officers. His wife was put into a white van and transported to a quarantine isolation facility.
And then, Britney and Nick join us from having spent 4 days in jail in New Brunswick for standing up for our freedoms. The video says a lot. Wake up people.

If you don’t want to live in concentration camps like in Nazi Germany or Communist China. Then you had all better wake up. That is, where we are headed. I see history repeating itself.


Victim number 2 Dan is talking about.

Red Deer mother in tears as son taken to undisclosed isolation centre

“They won’t tell me who’s picking him up. They won’t tell me where he’s going. They won’t tell me anything.”


January 31, 2021

A Red Deer mom has told of her anguish after watching her son being detained at the Calgary airport, loaded into a van, and taken to an undisclosed isolation centre.

Rebekah McDonald was at the airport late Saturday night, hoping to welcome her son, Ethan, back to Calgary from Arizona.

McDonald hadn’t seen her son for two years.

But the joy soon turned to tears when her son was taken into custody for having what the Canadian federal government considers the wrong COVID-19 test.

“They are saying it’s not accurate and they are wanting to take him to a quarantine facility. They won’t let me talk to him. They won’t let me see him. They won’t come and talk to me. The border patrol services say they have nothing to do with it – they won’t tell me who has to do with it,” said McDonald in a social media video as she walked through the airport concourse.

“They won’t tell me who’s picking him up. They won’t tell me where he’s going. They won’t tell me anything.

“They say he doesn’t have a choice, that it’s the law. They say I don’t have the right to talk to him. They are taking him against my will and his will and I’m not okay with it. I don’t know what to do about it and I don’t know where I’m supposed to find him.

“I’m freaking out,” said McDonald, dissolving into tears.

In a bid to level off the number of COVID-19 cases being brought in by returning travellers, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Friday upon their arrival back in Canada, they will be taken to an isolation facility and given another coronavirus test.

If testing negative after three days, they will be able to leave the government facility and finish the rest of their quarantine period at home. If positive, they are taken to another isolation location for the 14-day time frame.

In a later social media post, McDonald said her worries are being extended because the health officials in question don’t work weekends.

“I’m just angry now – there is zero accountability, there’s no questions asked, there is nobody you can hold accountable for this,” she said.

“I just want people to ask themselves what kind of Canada they want to live in. People fight long and hard for freedom and this just feels really wrong. It is really wrong.” The McDonald case was at least the second one at the Calgary airport to cause anguish amongst families.

Edmonton Pastor Chris Mathews told of his terrifying experience at the airport Thursday night when he went to pick up his wife, Nikki.

She had been given the wrong test in Dallas and was whisked to the isolation centre after she landed at YYC.

The Justice Centre for Constitution Freedoms (JCCF) say they will file immediate court challenges to Trudeau plan saying it’s unconstitutional.

Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard Source

Victim number 3 Dan is talking about

WARMINGTON: Man in forced detention in a Canada COVID hotel

By Joe Warmington Publishing date: Feb 03, 2021  

Steve Duesing provided the Toronto Sun columnist Joe Warmington with a selfie he took while in forced isolation at a Dixon Rd. hotel. Photo by Steve Duesing /Toronto Sun

You will have to forgive Steve Duesing for not believing there are no COVID-19 internment centres in Canada.

“I’m in one,” the 34-year-old Scarborough man told the Toronto Sun on Tuesday.

Not by choice.

“I was told when I arrived (at Pearson International Airport) Sunday night from Charlotte that it was either three days quarantine or go to jail.”

So he was escorted on a shuttle bus from Pearson to the nearby Radisson Hotel on Dixon Rd. But this is no normal hotel stay.

“I am not allowed to leave the room,” he said. “There is a guard at the end of the hall.”

So, he must remain in a ninth-floor hotel room while waiting for the results of a COVID test he was forced to take.

A photo taken by Steve Duesing of the hallway at the Radisson hotel on Dixon Rd. where he’s being forced to stay after landing at Pearson. Steve Duesing

Joined by award-winning photographer Jack Boland, I interviewed Steve on the phone from the parking lot as we looked at him through the window of his room where he could see Tim Hortons, Harvey’s, Subway and Swiss Chalet.

“But I was told I can’t order in food,” said Steve.

He’s effectively incarcerated.

“It feels like that,” he said. “I don’t have any say in it.”

The worst part is before he left from visiting a friend in North Carolina, he got a COVID-19 test as required by new rules.

“It cost me $130,” he said. “I tested negative.

Duesing said his ordeal began when the Public Health Agency of Canada didn’t accept this rapid test and ordered him detained until the results of their own test were known. The agency did not respond to the Sun‘s request for a comment.

“I was escorted by police to a shuttle bus and taken to this hotel, which is fenced off from the public.”

It definitely has a detention centre feel to it. There is a barrier preventing anybody from coming and going and a security detail checks every vehicle entering the property.

Steve Duesing speaks to the Toronto Sun’s Joe Warmnington from his ninth-floor hotel suite on Feb. 2, 2021 where he is in forced quarantine. JACK BOLAND/TORONTO SUN Photo by Jack Boland, Toronto Sun /Toronto Sun

It’s a lonely, solitary existence, added Steve. “I should be allowed to leave at 10 p.m. tonight (Tuesday).”

This doesn’t seem legal in a free country. It also seems punitive. If he had a fever or cough, perhaps precautionary measures of some kind could be taken.

But taking away someone’s liberty is obscene. It feels like a violation of basic human rights in a country that purports to champion such freedoms.

A notice in his room said, “You must remain in your assigned room and are required to limit face-to-face contact with others outside of your immediate room assignment.”

A sandwich provided to Steve Duesing during his forced hotel stay after landing at Pearson. Steve Duesing

Just like a prisoner, he gets water sent up and a sandwich.

“I don’t have any symptoms,” said Steve. “I am angry, but other than that, I’m fine.”

But he worries about the eight other people taken off his American Airlines flight, and dozens of others, inside this hotel. ”Some cried and said they would lose their jobs or didn’t have babysitters,” he said.

There was no leniency. They were no longer free. They were ordered into government custody.

“It’s very annoying, but I couldn’t imagine going through this with a family or having people waiting for me,” he said.

This big question is, will he have to pay to be forced into this hotel. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said people will have to finance their own mandatory hotel quarantine when travellers land at Pearson.

“I haven’t signed anything, or agreed to pay for anything, and I won’t,” he said. “I think I got lucky and arrived the last day before you had to start paying because Trudeau said people will have to pay $2,000 to $3,000 to stay the three days to cover the cost of security, doctors and food.”

Whatever it costs, it’s not a hotel stay, but a bizarre pandemic rendition into a Canadian COVID containment hotel! Source

If these things are happening to anyone you know, be sure to get it out there. Never stay silent.

This could happen to one of your friends, relatives or you. They will come into your home and take your children next. That has been done on other places already. Don’t take my word for it, the stories, got out there. Hunt them down. If you find any, put them in the comments with links. Time to collect all the nightmares. The main stream media will not report them. I do not find much useful information via the main stream media. They just push the fear factor and lies. Break the Silence.

Rebel News is also willing to help, those kidnapped as well. They will also be tracking those who have been kidnapped.

Feb 2, 2021

Tell your horror stories. This should not be happening anywhere in the world. Odds of stories like this, making it to the mains stream media are slim to none.

The main stream media has a hard time airing any of the protests, just to add insult to injury.

There have been massive amounts of protests world wide over the past year, here are a few from the last few days.

Many of those masks everyone is forced to wear are also made in China. By forced labour no less.

Update February 4, 2021

New research raises concerns about nasal swab testing

The report is Absolute bullshit. So the young lad, who ever he is, says the tests give to many false negatives. False negatives my foot. They are all false positives. Most people do not know that however. So the public will eat it up like candy. If the main stream media says it. It must be true. Right?

Now if you do go take a look, the videos at CTV get changed. They were caught doing that a while back. Anything can be edited out or added. Even videos can be changed.  CTV edited out a part of a video.  So what is there one day may be gone the next.

The Montréal Gazette did that a while back, as well. They replaced an entire video with a new one. Some one mentioned it was not there, so I went back and sure enough it was gone. A photo that had been there, also changed, was gone.

They are gearing up for the new and improved Covod  test,. I am guessing that is why the Canadian Government is now saying the tests people were given, before flying home, are no good, then they are kidnapped and locked up.

China using anal swabs (with little warning) to test for COVID-19

Passengers on a flight to Beijing were taken to a hotel where they were subjected to anal swabs, said a passenger identified only by his last name, Wang

January 31, 2021

A few videos

World Protests against Lockdown measures

The VAERS system is now reporting 329 deaths from vaccines (and we know this is a tiny percentage) Newest update Feb 4, 2021

11,000 pages of evidence – 447 exhibits in 27 Volumes- in support of their claims. Environmental Health Trust researchers filed 60 of the 447 exhibits. that wireless is dangerous. The links to them are all there. What you don’t know, can and will kill you or someone you love, even your pets.

Court Case: 5G Impacts on Health. Massive Scientific Evidence Ignored by FCC

Published in: on February 1, 2021 at 2:29 pm  Comments (1)  
Tags: , , ,

Forced to Get the COVID Vaccine? ICAN May Be Able to Help.

Update January 30, 2021 Adding VAERS

In the U.S., which relies almost exclusively on passive surveillance, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Check it out you might be shocked, at what you find.

January 29, 2021

If you live in the US:

Informed Consent Action Network’s legal team is offering to help individuals challenge employers or schools that are requiring COVID vaccinations.

The Informed Consent Action Network’s (ICAN) legal team, led by Aaron Siri, is challenging employers and schools that require a COVID-19 vaccine.

Employers and schools that previously required the COVID-19 vaccine have dropped those requirements. This includes an employer that did so on the heels of ICAN’s legal team challenging its mandate in court. 

If you or anyone you know is being required by an employer or school to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, ICAN is offering to support legal action on your behalf to challenge the requirement.

In order to obtain this potential assistance, email ICAN at and provide a copy of the written notice from your school or employer stating that the COVID-19 vaccine is required. 

ICAN hopes to be able to assist everyone, but that will depend on the available resources and the number of individuals that contact ICAN for assistance. Source

Nursing home fires workers for refusing COVID-19 vaccination

Unwillingness to submit to a vaccine will result in termination for failing to ‘perform the essential functions of the job.’

Jan 25, 2021

JANESVILLE, Wisconsin, January 25, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A nursing home run by Rock County is receiving significant pushback after mandating its employees receive the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine regimen or face layoff.

Officials at Rock Haven issued a memo on December 23 informing workers that reception of the vaccine was “a requirement for all staff” and those who did not comply would be laid off for failing to “perform the essential functions of the job.”  For the rest go to the Source

With all the adverse events happening due to the vaccines I don’t blame them.

On the other hand, some refuse give them.

This might become a common thing with the side effects we now are seeing.

Kansas nurses refuse to give COVID-19 vaccines

5G Related: To the U.S. Surgeon General – Stop Pentagon’s Red Flag Exercises Now to Protect the Public

Court Case: 5G Impacts on Health. Massive Scientific Evidence Ignored by FCC

There are a number of petitions at the below link. US, UK, Canada and the EU on vaccines.

Questions you Ask all Governments before getting the Covid Vaccine

Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud

A few days ago I revived a comment about the name Rainbow Warrior

Can’t say it was a nice comment. It was rather rude. That comment did make me laugh however.

Well that name, reminds me of how corrupt, some governments can be. That is why I choose the name.

So I never forget, why I do, what I do.

Rainbow Warrior A History Lesson on the name. Just for You know, who you are.

Published in: on January 29, 2021 at 11:11 pm  Comments Off on Forced to Get the COVID Vaccine? ICAN May Be Able to Help.  
Tags: , ,

Court Case: 5G Impacts on Health. Massive Scientific Evidence Ignored by FCC

From January 25th, 2021

Environmental Health Trust (EHT), the scientific think tank headed by award-winning scientist Devra Davis PhD, MPH is the lead petitioner in a landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

After consolidation of the cases by the Courts, the historic case is filed jointly with Children’s Health Defense, Consumers for Safer Phones and numerous other petitioners including Elizabeth Barris, Theodora Scarato MSW, Michelle Hertz, Petra Broken, Dr. David Carpenter, Dr. Toril Jelter, Dr. Paul Dart, Dr. Ann Lee, Virginia Farver, Jennifer Baran and Paul Stanley M.Ed.

EHT et al. v. the FCC seeks to have the Court order the FCC to remand, vacate and update its 25-year-old exposure guidelines for radio-frequency radiation (RFR) from cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, 5G and other wireless communication devices.

Oral arguments with a three judge panel was January 25, 2021 at 9:30 EST.  

The three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that presides over the case includes the Honorable Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins.

“Environmental Health Trust has worked for over a decade to protect the public from radiofrequency radiation, testified to Congress and published critical research on why children are more vulnerable,” said Devra Davis PhD, MPH, President and founder of Environmental Health Trust. “The FCC has ignored our extensive submissions to the FCC over the years which clearly document harm. As the legacies of lead, asbestos, and tobacco teach us, this issue deserves the immediate attention of our federal government in order to protect our children’s healthy future.”

Links to the Scientific Evidence, Court Cases, Personal Testimony Presented in the Case


Amicus Briefs 

Click on the Volumes Below to See the Links to the Massive Evidence Filed in EHT et al v. FCC Ignored by the FCC

Petitioners filed 11,000 pages of evidence – 447 exhibits in 27 Volumes-  in support of their  claims. Environmental Health Trust researchers filed 60 of the 447 exhibits.

  • Download  Volume 1: Volume 1 Includes FCC Resolution of Notice of Inquiry Order and Notice of Inquiry
  • Download  Volume 2: Includes FCC; Comments & reply of the CTIA The Wireless Association & Mobile Manufacturers Forum ET Docket No. 13-84
  • Download  Volume 3: Research Compilation; Abstracts of over 2,100 studies published between 1990 – 2017; Prof. Henry Lai.(Tab 7 Part 2)
  • Download  Volume 4: Includes Research Compilation; Abstracts of over 2,100 studies published between 1990 – 2017; Prof. Henry Lai.(Tab 7 Part 3)
  • Download  Volume 5: Includes Research Compilation; Abstracts of over 2,100 studies published between 1990 – 2017; Prof. Henry Lai.(Tab 7 Part 4) Research Compilation; Abstracts of Over 600 Studies Published BetweenAugust 2016- August 2019, Dr. Joel Moskowitz; 2019 (Tab 8 Part 1)
  • Download  Volume 6: Includes Research Compilation; Abstracts of over 600 Studies Published Between August 2016- August 2019, Dr. Joel Moskowitz; 2019 (Tab 8 Part 2) Research Compilation; Abstracts of 15 New Studies, Dr. Joel Moskowitz Ph.D., 2016, Research Compilation; Studies and Documents; City of Pinole, CA
  • Download Volume 7: Includes US Exposures Limits – A History of Their Creation, Comments and Explanations; Eng. Lloyd Morgan, Biosystem & Ecosystem; Birds, Bees and Mankind: Destroying Nature by ‘Electrosmog’: Effects of Mobile Radio and Wireless Communication.Dr. Ulrich Warnke, Ph.D., 2007, Cancer; IARC Monograph: NonIonizing Radiation Part 2: RF EMFs, 2013 (Tab 13 Part 1)
  • Download  Volume 8: Includes BioInitiative Comments, Cancer; IARC Monograph: NonIonizing Radiation Part 2: RF EMFs, 2013 (Tab 13 Part 2), NTP; Commentary on the utility of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation data for assessing human health risks despite unfounded criticisms aimed at minimizing the findings of adverse health effects. Environmental Research. Dr. Ron Melnick; 2019 andmore…
  • Download  Volume 9: Includes BioInitiative-Modulation; Section 15:Evidence for Disruption by Modulation Role of Physical and Biological Variables in Bioeffects of Non-Thermal Microwaves for Reproducibility, Cancer Risk and Safety Standards, (2012 Supplement), Bioinitiative Working Group; Preliminary Opinion on Potential Health Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF); 2014, Organizations; Environmental Working Group Reply Comments and more…
  • Download Volume 10: BioInitiative-Mechanisms of Harm; Percent Comparison Showing Effect vs No Effect, DNA (Comet Assay), 2017 and Free Radical (Oxidative Stress), 2019, Bio Initiative Working Group; Epidemiological Studies, RF fields epidemiology, Comments by Drs. Lennart Hardell, Fredrik Soderqvist PhD. and Michael Carlberg, MSc. Section Epidemiological Studies (Exhibit B); 2014, BioInitiative Author; Statement of Prof. Martin Blank PhD., PhD.; 2016, and more…
  • Download Volume 11: Dr. Paul Dart MD. (Petitioner) Comments, The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields, Problems and Solutions, Prof. Andrew Goldsworthy; 2012, Dr. Richard Meltzer Comments, Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure: A Cautionary Tale, Dr. Donald R. Maisch Ph.D. Comments, Biological Effects from RF Radiation at Low-Intensity Exposure, based on the BioInitiative 2012 Report, and the Implications for Smart Meters and Smart Appliances; Dr. Ron M. Powell, PhD.; 2013 and more…
  • Download  Volume 12: Organizations –  Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health, Neurological and behavior effects οf Non-Ionizing Radiation emitted from mobile devices on children: Steps to be taken ASAP for the protection of children and future generations. Presentation Slides; 2016, Organizations; Austrian Medical Association, Environmental Medicine Evaluation of Electromagnetic Fields; Dr. Jerd Oberfeld MD.; 2007, Organizations; The American Academy of Pediatrics, Letter to the FCC; 2013 and more…
  • Download  Volume 13:Organizations; Appeal to the FCC Signed by 26,000 People and Organized by the Environmental Working Group, 2013 (Tab 68 Part 2), Organizations; Freiburger Appeal –Doctors Appeal; 2002, Organizations; Benevento Resolution, The International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS), 2006, Organizations; The Porto Alegre Resolution; 2009 and more…
  • Download Volume 14:  Mechanisms of Harm; Meta-Analysis, Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med (Yakymenko et al).; 2016, Mechanisms of Harm; Blood Brain Barrier; Increased Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability in Mammalian Brain 7 Days after Exposure to the Radiation from a GSM-900 Mobile Phone. Pathophysiology (Nittby, Salford et al); 2009, Mechanisms of Harm; DNA Damage; Microwave RF Interacts with Molecular Structures; Dr. Paul Dart MD.; 2013 and more…
  • Download   Volume 15:Prenatal & Children; Doctors and Scientists Letters on Wi-Fi in Schools, Dr. Devra Davis PhD., President of Environmental Health Trust (Petitioner) Comments, Children; Letter to Montgomery County Schools, Prof. Martha Herbert MD., PhD.; 2015, Neurological – Children; A Prospective Cohort Study of Adolescents’ Memory Performance and Individual Brain Dose of Microwave Radiation from Wireless Communication. Environ Health Perspect. (Foerster et al); 2018, Prenatal & Children; Cell phone use and behavioral problems in young children. J Epidemiol Community Health. (Divan et al); 2012 and more…
  • Download  Volume 16: Prenatal & Children; “Cell Phones & WiFi – Are Children, Fetuses and Fertility at Risk?”; 2013, Prenatal & Children; Safe Schools 2012, Medical and Scientific Experts Call for Safe Technologies in Schools,Prenatal & Children – Stem Cells; Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk. Environmental Health Perspectives (Markova, Belyaev et al); 2010, Radiation Sickness – Children; Angela Tsiang Comments and more…
  • Download  Volume 17: 5G; FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler ‘The Future of Wireless: A Vision for U.S. Leadership in a 5G World’; 2016, 5G; Letter to House Subcommittee on Communications and Technology; Tsiang; 2016, 5G; Ask Congress to Vote No, 2016, 5G; 5G Spectrum Frontiers -The Next Great Unknown Experiment On Our Children, Compilation of Letters to Congress; 2016, 5G;What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless and “Small” Cells and more…
  • DownloadVolume 18: Cell Phones; Research Abstracts of Over 700 Studies Showing Health Effects from Cell Phone Radio Frequency Radiation; Prof. Henri Lai ,(Tab 142 Part 2), Cancer – Brain Tumors; Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with the use of mobile and cordless phones. Rev Environ Health. (Hardell and Caarlsberg); 2013 , Cancer-Brain Tumors; Mobile phone use and brain tumor risk: early warnings, early actions? (Gee, Hardell Carlsberg) (Chapter 21 of Report: “Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution”); 2013, Jullian Gehman Esq. Comments and more…
  • Download  Volume 19: Dr. Joel Moskowitz PhD. Reply Comments, Why the FCC Must Strengthen Radiofrequency Radiation Limits in the U.S., Cancer – Children; Cell Phone Radiation: Science Review on Cancer Risks and Children’s Health; Environmental Working Group; 2009, Cell Phones – Plants; Review: Weak Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure From Mobile Phone Radiation on Plants. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine (Malka N. Halgamuge); 2016, Testing; Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body. IEEE Access. Prof. Om P. Gandhi PhD.; 2019, Testing – Children; Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality. Environmental Research. (C. Fernandez et al); 2018 and more…
  • DownloadVolume 20: Industry Influence; World Health Organization, Radiofrequency Radiation and Health – a Hard Nut to Crack (Review). International Journal of Oncology. Prof. Lennart Hardell MD. PhD.; 2017, Industry Influence; Business Bias As Usual: The Case Of Electromagnetic Pollution. Prof. Levis, Prof. Gennaro, Prof. Garbisa, Industry Influence; Prof. Martha Herbert MD PhD., Harvard Pediatric Neurologist Letter to Los Angeles Unified School District; 2013, Industry Influence; The Procrustean Approach: Setting Exposure Standards for Telecommunications Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation, Dr. Donald Maisch PhD.; 2009 (Tab 172 Part 1) and more.
  • DownloadVolume 21: Industry Influence; The Procrustean Approach: Setting Exposure Standards for Telecommunications Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation, Dr. Donald Maisch PhD.; 2009 (Tab 172 Part 2), Industry Influence; Illusion and Escape: The Cell Phone Disease Quagmire. Dr. George L. Carlo PhD., JD.; 2008, Industry Influence; Quote of Prof. Henry Lai PhD from NY Times Article about Percent of Negative, Studies Funded By Industry; 2013, Industry Influence; Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health. Christopher Ketcham, GQ; 2010 and more…
  • Download  Volume 22: US Agencies; US Naval Medical Research Institute. Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-frequency, Radiation; 1971 (Tab 185 Part 2), US Agencies; US Department of Labor Comment, Radiation Sickness; Exemption for Fire stations, California Assembly Bill No. 57 (2015), codified at Cal. Gov. Code 65964.1, Radiation Sickness – Firefighters; Susan Foster Comments, Radiation Sickness; Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, Dr. Erica MalleryBlythe; 2014 and more…
  • Download  Volume 23: Radiation Sickness; Brent Dalton Comments, Radiation Sickness; Elizabeth Barris (Petitioner) Comments, Radiation Sickness; Olemara Comments, Radiation Sickness; Melissa White Comments, Radiation Sickness; Carol Moore Comments, Radiation Sickness; Michele Hertz (Petitioner) Comments and more…
  • Download Volume 24: Radiation Sickness; Catherine Morgan Comments, Radiation Sickness; Angelica Rose Comments, Radiation Sickness; Brian J. Bender Comments, Radiation Sickness; Maggie Connolly Comments, Radiation Sickness; Gregory Temmer Comments, Radiation Sickness; Bernice Nathanson Comments, and more…
  • Download  Volume 25: Radiation Sickness; Testimonials of Twelve People; 2013, Radiation Sickness; Testimonials of Nine People; 2013, Radiation Sickness; Testimonials of Twenty People, Collected byStopSmartMeters; 2013, Radiation Sickness: Doctor’s Diagnosis Letter for Peter Rose; 2010, Radiation Sickness; Doctor’s Diagnosis Letter for Steven Magee, European Manifesto in support of a European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) and more…
  • Download  Volume 26: Individual Rights; R. Paul and Kathleen Sundmark Reply Comments, Individual Rights & ADA; Cynthia Edwards Comments, Individual Rights; Diana Ostermann, Comments, Individual Rights; BC Human Rights Tribunal approves smart meter class action, Citizens for Safe Technology, and more...
  • Download  Volume 27: Testing – Children; Exposure Limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine (Gandhi et al); 2011, BioInitiative Reply Comments, Environmental Health Trust INTERNATIONAL POLICY BRIEFING: Cautionary Policy on Radiofrequency Radiation Actions by Governments, Health Authorities and Schools Worldwide

Environmental Health Trust et al. v. the FCCImpacts of 5G Wireless Radiation on Children’s Health: CHD Law Suit against FCC

Environmental Health Trust (EHT), the scientific think tank headed by Devra Davis PhD, MPH, filed the principal brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Wednesday in a landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The appeal is aimed at getting the FCC to reconsider, revise, and update its 24-year old exposure limits for radio-frequency radiation (RFR) from cellphones, cell towers, Wi-FI networks, smart meters, and other wireless communication devices and facilities. The brief is filed jointly with Children’s Health Defense and numerous individual petitioners.

The FCC Violated the Law

The Petitioners contend the FCC ignored the extensive evidence submitted to the agency showing that non-thermal levels of pulsed and modulated RFR emitted by wireless technology are harmful to humans, wildlife and the environment, and its order failed to provide a record of a reasoned decision making. Therefore, the Petitioners claim the FCC has violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and its decision is capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based. In addition, the Petitioners argue that the FCC violated NEPA because the Agency did not consider the environmental impacts of its decision.  It also violated the 1996 Telecommunications Act (TCA) because it failed to consider the impact of its decision on public health and safety.

The FCC ignored numerous submissions detailing injuries and rapidly growing illnesses such as Radiation Sickness from radiofrequency radiation and ignored calls such as those from the cities of Boston and Philadelphia to address the sickness. Petitioners argued that the inadequate FCC guidelines are used to deny accommodation in violation of the Americans with Disability Act. The Petitioners filed 11,000 pages of scientific evidence and comments ignored by the FCC in support of their  claims.


The FCC opened an Inquiry into the adequacy of its exposure limits in 2013 after the Government Accountability Office issued a report in 2012 stating that the limits may not reflect current science and need to be reviewed. In response, hundreds of scientists and medical professionals submitted a wealth of peer-reviewed studies showing the consensus of the scientific community is that RFR is deeply harmful to people and the environment and is linked to cancer, reproductive harm, and other biological ills to humans, animals, and plants. Notwithstanding the extremely well-documented record of these negative impacts from RFR, the FCC released an order in December 2019 deciding that nothing needed to be done and maintaining that the existing, antiquated exposure limits are adequate now and for the future.

Note to readers: please share . Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. Source

“It was quite impressive to note how thoroughly the judges had read our brief in this complicated case. They asked pointed questions about what we have documented in our case to be the failure of the FCC to produce a record of reasoned decision making. For example the judges zeroed in on the fact that there is a US inter-agency radio frequency working group with which there is no record of consultation on the record. Further they questioned the FCC regarding the fact that it’s own technical advisory group on electronic products had failed to weigh in on cell phones altogether.  The justices questioned how the agency could ignore the undeniable fact that the types of devices, wireless uses and users of wireless devices are radically different today than they were when the standards were first set,”  stated Devra Davis PhD MPH president of Environmental Health Trust. There are two parts to the video. The court part, then a discussion. I advise listening to it all.


5G Related: To the U.S. Surgeon General – Stop Pentagon’s Red Flag Exercises Now to Protect the Public

5G was developed by the Israelis and US for crowd control

A connection between 5G and Covid 19

This is Updated as they find new reports of deaths and injuries. Thousands had side effects from Covid Vaccine

Published in: on January 29, 2021 at 1:01 pm  Comments (2)  
Tags: , , ,

5G Related: To the U.S. Surgeon General – Stop Pentagon’s Red Flag Exercises Now to Protect the Public

The Role of 5G, US Command and Control, The Pentagon’s “Red Flag Exercise”

January 26, 2021

The next Pentagon Red Flag exercise runs January 25 to February 12 from the Nevada Test and Training Range and Nellis Air Force Base. Manilo Dinucci reported in June [1] that the Nellis 5G network would be fully operational and an active component of this year’s exercises.

At Red Flag 2021, 5G relocatable cell towers, that can be set up and taken down in less than an hour, will be probably already operating to be tested in a real environment. Nellis base is the fifth base selected by the Pentagon to test the military use of 5G: the others are located in Utah, Georgia, California and Washington State.

5G will allow the entire command and control system of the United States armed forces to be strengthened worldwide.

5G will play a decisive role particularly in the use of hypersonic weapons which travel at speeds exceeding 10 times that of sound also equipped with nuclear warheads.

5G will also be extremely important for secret services, making control and intelligence systems much more effective than those currently used.

These exercises significantly increase the radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMF) emissions in the U.S. due to radar, communications, GPS jamming, EMF weapons, satellites, and other equipment. The serious health problems experienced throughout the country have included cardiac disorders, severe sleep disruption, microwave hearing, and other neurological problems. RF-EMF also impacts the immune system – at a time when Americans need a strong immune system — and is a known carcinogen and causes genetic and DNA damage. In addition, it harms wildlife including bees and other insects, especially 5G millimeter waves.[2]

Due to the environmental and public health hazards, these military exercises must be halted immediately. I urge everyone to contact the U.S. Surgeon General and other state and federal officials now.

2021 exercises at the Nevada Test and Training Range:

  • Red Flag 21-1: 1/25/21 to 2/12/21
  • Red Flag 21-2: 3/8/21 – 3/19/21
  • Red Flag 21-3: 7/19/21 – 8/6/21

WSINT – Weapons School Integration

  • 21A 5/24 – 6/17/21
  • 21B 11/22 – 12/16/21
  • JFEX – Joint Forcible Entry Exercise –
  • 21A – June 12, 2021
  • 21B Dec. 11, 2021

(Information from


January 24, 2021

To the Surgeon General

Vivek Murthy MD

Dear Dr. Murthy:

Despite the COVID19 disaster, the Pentagon is conducting Red Flag and other military exercises in conjunction with the Nevada Testing and Training Range and Nellis AFB. Red Flag 21-1 is due to begin Jan. 25 and last into February 12.

These exercises negatively affect the public health and the environment by using high levels and far-reaching patterns of EMF emissions for jamming and EMF warfare practices that cover many parts of the United States and may extend into Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean nations. The military have added progressive capabilities to these exercises, to now include their new 5G network in conjunction with satellites.

I urgently request that you halt these exercises immediately in the interest of the public health and welfare, and the security of the nation.

Medical experts and EMF research scientists have warned about the hazards of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation for years [3]. During past Red Flag exercises, members of the public reported the sudden onset of serious health problems, only to find out that symptoms started when these military exercises began.

These harmful emissions can affect public health in a myriad of ways including heart function, cognition, and cause increased incidence of migraine or headache, seizures, heart arrhythmia, sleep disturbances, skin problems, clicking or ringing in the ears, flu-like symptoms, difficulty breathing, pain, and other health problems. RF-EMF also impacts the Immune system – the last thing the public needs right now – and exposure causes cellular stress, rouleaux formation in the blood, and DNA damage. This will also affect pets and wildlife.5G, the New Track of the Arms Race

Additional hazards include interference with medical devices including pacemakers, Parkinson’s deep brain implants, and hospital equipment, as well as GPS equipment .

The most vulnerable people are people who are already disabled by electromagnetic sensitivity (EMS) — a functional impairment that occurs from exposure to EMF – or have other EMF-sensitive medical conditions including nerve damage, cancer, heart disorders, amputations or susceptibilty to stroke, or those with medical implants or devices. Many of people with EMS are already extremely ill from current levels of RF-EMF, suffering excruciating pain and crippling effects. The cities of Boston and Philadelphia [4] warned in 2013 about the suffering of the EMF-disabled. Based on a 1998 prevalence survey by the California Department of Health Services [5], millions of Americans could be at serious, even life-threatening risk from these drills.

The European Academy of Environmental Medicine released their report “EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses,”[6] expanding on the 2012 report by the Austrian Medical Association.[7] Have you read these reports?

However, in the 1990s, Congress defunded the EPA’s RF-EMF research and work on developing federal standards, and a recent FOIA request revealed that the last EPA review of literature was in 1984.[8] That is unconscionable and a violation of the public trust.

In 2015, the Canadian Parliament held three days of hearings on the public health hazards created by rising levels of EMF emissions and lax regulations, which the CMAJ reported.[9] And now there are the U.S. National Toxicology Program and Italian Ramazzini Institute results along with older cancer studies that show this radiation is a carcinogen.

The Naval Medical Research compiled a lengthy bibliography[10] in 1972 of studies showing biological effects. Extensive military research for decades has weaponized these effects, including the poppers used in Iraq and the Active Denial System using millimeter waves which causes intense burning sensations. These same millimeter waves are being deployed for 5G.

A COVID variant is causing additional concern for medical professionals. The DNA- and gene-damaging effects of RF-EMF radiation exposure are well known, including CTIA-Wireless Association sponsored research by Dr. Henry Lai, and a study by Belyaev in 1996 finding altered genetic structure in E. Coli bacteria at exposure levels of 0.0000000000001 microwatts per cm2, [11] far below U.S. exposure limits of 1000.0 microwatts per cm2. Increasing the public exposure to RF-EMF makes no sense to any rational person.

I request that you take leadership on this critical matter now and halt these military exercises immediately for this year and the indefinite future to protect the public, the environment, and the national security. The continuance of these exercises risks catastrophic harm and complicates an already difficult and unpredictable medical situation. These experiments are done without any public notification or advance warning, public hearings, environmental review, public input, or full informed consent from the public. The public is shut out of decision-making, despite paying the bill. This must end now.

A CE/CME-accredited virtual EMF Medical Conference (EMFMC) will be held January 28-31. It will cover RF-EMF/wireless radiation health effects. Please inform your staff and the national health officers of this critically important and timely conference. It offers 20.5 hours of CME. Please attend this conference.

Please respond at your earliest to my request.


Nina Beety

For more information on Red Flag and the 2018 Red Flag drill, read this.


If you are in those areas, don’t be shocked if anyone gets sick.

The FCC are using research/studies from 1996. Nothing new since then. 5G has not had any safety studies done by the FCC. Now ask yourself, how much wireless was around in 1996. Well if your old enough to remember 1996 that is. Other wise google can be your best friend. Do some research. It was only 25 years ago.

By the way if anyone was checking out the VAERS site in the US, for vaccine adverse affects, the site is apparently back up and running. Nice to know so many went to visit the site, to get the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths, that site went down on Tuesday some time, from too many people checking it out. Now I have an idea of how many people, have finally got with the program of doing research. It will be updated again, some time Friday January 29, 2021. So they say. Just remember less the 1% of adverse affects, are reported.

This is Updated as they find new reports of deaths and injuries. Thousands had side effects from Covid Vaccine

Published in: on January 28, 2021 at 8:40 pm  Comments Off on 5G Related: To the U.S. Surgeon General – Stop Pentagon’s Red Flag Exercises Now to Protect the Public  
Tags: ,

WHO now saying You do not need to Wear a Mask

Update April 20, 2021

It is with a heavy heart, I am letting you know, a two year old child has died from the Pfizer Covid vaccine. A little girl. Wake up people. this must be stopped. Look at all the little kids you know, is this what they deserve? No one in their right mind, lets this happen to anyone let alone children. She did not consent that is for sure. Does anyone still trust the drug companies?

Update April 19, 2021

This is what many have been saying all along. Masks are bad for you. Really bad for you. Do take the time to read this. Maybe even share it with others.

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

 From Stanford University

A couple of Quotes 

 Therefore, it has been hypothesized:

1) the practice of wearing facemasks has compromised safety and efficacy profile,

2) Both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19,

3) Wearing facemasks has adverse physiological and psychological effects, 4) Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks on health are detrimental

 Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death.

The bottom line is masks are dangerous.

Update April 8, 2021

Never been a big fan of of Alex, but this is right on. They are using a lot of the WHO tactics as well, as pointed out by others. They planned way ahead they did.

SPARS 2025-2028 Should be SARS 2019-2023 They moved the timeline is all

Update April 2, 2021

This is an interesting read. Seems old folks in LTC homes saw doctors less and did not go to hospital as often as they should have, when they were sick.

Update March 30, 2021

More masks have been recalled. They are toxic. Dangerous and have affected millions, who wore them.Long term health problems are unknown of course. It took the government about three months to figure this out of course. These masks could be in any country. They do know they were made in China. These are not the first ones recalled, hundreds of others have been recalled as well.

Update March 9, 2021

Follow the money trail and you find out, who is behind the so called pandemic. This is just a minor drip in the bucket.

Healthcare Billionaires ‘Made a Killing’ During Pandemic While Workers Struggled to Get By

A January report by IPS and Americans for Tax Fairness revealed that the nation’s 660 billionaires added a combined $1.1 trillion to their fortunes since last March. Well now you know where a whole lot of your tax dollars went and what ever other method they had of scamming money out of you. How nice they made so much money off everyone’s pain and suffering. Source

The UK Government is on a mission to vaccinate the entire population of the UK with an experimental gene therapy. Their supposed reasoning is to protect us all against a “deadly” virus. But that just isn’t the case, the resulting disease statistically kills only 0.2% of those it infects and the majority of those deaths are aged over 85 and have underlying health conditions.
Guess who makes money from vaccines or the health care industry?

Jeff Bezos and the Walmart heirs have grown $116 billion richer during the pandemic—35 times the total hazard pay given to more than 2.5 million Amazon and Walmart workers.

Biden Gives $4 BILLION to WHO and Bill Gates for Global COVID Vaccine Injury Compensation Program No one will ever get compensation. If they did manage, it would take a lot of jumping through hoops to get it. I see this as just a transfer of money.

Prospering in the pandemic: 2020’s top 100 companies China is doing really well.

Update March 8, 2021

This post has two stories in it, the lawsuit and testing on children in schools. The schools are blackmailing parents. To all parents stand up for your children’s rights.

First Court Case Against Mandatory Vaccination in New Mexico

Update February 15, 2021 The last video is a must watch, on the Protest of February 14, 2021 . The Police have been served with a notice of the crimes committed.

They must all look into the crimes, that have been committed, against every Canadian.

The crimes have been reported. The Police have to investigate those crimes.I think sending old people from hospitals to old folks homes might also constitute a major crime. Like murder.

When old people even get a common cold, they can get very sick and die, A cold can turn into things like pneumonia etc. Old people in care homes have very weak immune system and are vulnerable to all sorts of things. If any of the patients from hospitals had the flu that would be devastating. Torturing them with isolation and keeping their families away long term, is a crime. Many died alone, without their families and friends by their side. That is beyond cruel.

Ottawa Canada: Parliament Hill Protest Feb 14, 2021

Update from February 13, 2021

This should never be done to any child. The want to test the vaccines on babies. Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Update from February 11, 2021 They tested 44 vaccines.These are just a few things they found in the vaccines: Aluminum, Silicon, Barium, Tungsten, Platinum, Silver, Lead, Copper, Zirconium There are more. How do these metals etc get into vaccines? Aluminum is now used instead of mercury in many, and it is bad for children’s health, but the other ones, that is a whole other story. What harm could they do, I have to wonder? I know many of them are toxic if you breath or eat them. Injecting them must be worse. There really needs to be more in depth studies into all the garbage, in vaccines. My jaw dropped after reading everything they found in them. Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

There is a new update to one of the posts below. It was updated February, 4, 2021– 2 More victims have been kidnapped at the airport in Canada.

Update Feb 2, 2021

They did a lot of things back in the day to brain wash people.

They are using many of those techniques to brain wash people now. MK Ultra was used to do just that. There is a massive amount of information about this. Mask wearing/face covering, hoods is one of those techniques. Isolation, and this list goes on. They experimented on children too. I cannot find that part yet. they did make the some of the kids wear masks. They also sexually assaulted the children. I think it was about 500 children they used to experiment on.They controlled every aspect of their lives. Much like what is being done today. Stay home is isolation. Can’t travel farther then 5K of your home is open air prison. Taking away jobs, takes your control over your income and life. The news repeated, the same thing over and over. You can thank Dr Cameron for that. They are still doing that, repeating things that is, only we now have a part 2 a so called second virus. So again everyone hears the same thing over and over for days on end. They want to find a cure for Covid/cold/flu (The vaccines) I advise everyone to find out as much about the techniques, they used and have mastered. MK Ultra never ended. They have used, what they learned and improved those techniques over the years. I am sure they are also using techniques, used by China as well. We are being brain washed. There are still a few videos at youtube about MK Ultra. You might want to check them out and think about how things then, are similar to things now. The end goal is to make everyone feel completely helpless and just do what you are told. The Police are playing a big part in that. They do not help they persecute. They are doing the opposite, of what they should be doing. So, when your really need help, who do you call or turn to? There is no one. That is MK Ultra for sure. Anyone on pharma drugs are more susceptible to all of this. There sure are a lot of them out there. Dr Cameron would be considered a so called expert.

There is some information here on MK Ultra. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Ted was ex FBI. He investigated many things. Child trafficking and many other areas. He investigated cults. He went down a lot of rabbit holes. He died in 20211. He did leave information behind. I advise downloading and keeping any files you find interesting as the site will vanish. It will give you a small idea of how things worked.

One of those groups is called The Finders, which Ted Gunderson said is operated by the CIA.

A film called The Sleep Room highlighted the brainwashing experiments, including electroshock and sleep therapy, conducted on psychiatric patients by Dr. Ewen Cameron at Montreal’s Allan Memorial Institute in the 1950s and 1960s. Here is the Movie they talk about. A bit over 2 hours long. The Sleep Room The CIA and MK Ultra in Canada., This baced on the truth and can be verified by the Fifth Estate reports, also still on youtube. For all Canadians if you can download those videos, as they will vanish too.

Update Feb 4, 2021

Warning people can just vanish. 2 More victims have been kidnapped at the airport in Canada.

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)

Well I found something that is worse then, Canada or maybe equal too it, a hospital in the US.

Nothing like holding a patient hostage or it could also be considered kidnapping of an old woman. This is not the world anyone wants to live in. This is insanity. The Police are as insane, as the so called Leaders, who are making the world into a dictatorship. Any and all Police should stop pulling this garbage. Their job is to protect the people. Seems world wide in most places, they are doing the opposite. They are waging war against the People. The People who pay their wages by the way. Now imagine if that was your mother, father, child, wife, husband, sister, brother, aunt, uncle or a close friend, in that hospital. How would you feel?

The WHO thinks this is a good idea. They think taking and locking people up is just fine and dandy. They even thin going into your home and taking your kids or whoever is a good idea. Ryan said that a while back.

Community Bands Together to Rescue Elderly Woman Medically Kidnapped

I listened to the WHO press conference for Jan 29, 2021 No mention of vaccines killing or maiming people. They just keep pushing the dangerous vaccines. By the way the vaccine for H1N1 Tedros talked about at the end, harmed a lot of children. For information on that go HERE Loads of information on the horrid things that happened, as well as a lot on how the WHO works with drug companies. Tedros must think everyone in the world is stupid.

They are responsible for many deaths and many more to come, from the Vaccines and the Lock downs.

If anyone trusts them, then they need to get some drastically needed help with that.

The reporters don’t even ask important questions. Like how many have died from the vaccines to date or been harmed.

Update January 30, 2021

The VAERS system is reporting 329 deaths (and we know this is a tiny percentage. Less then 1% that is. ) and close to 10k injured. Go HERE for that information. Or check the VAERS link below.

Update January 30, 2021 Adding VAERS

In the U.S., which relies almost exclusively on passive surveillance, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Check it out you might be shocked, at what you find.

The site the story came from has updated their story a bit, WHO does change their recommendations rather often. One day they will say one thing and the next week or a month latter, that could change. I did find a video of them saying, to not wear a mask unless you were sick, however. It was from another date of course. But they did say that. They a few weeks ago, changed their mind on the cycles to run the PCR tests at. They lowered the cycles. Which means you get less false positives. But whatever. They have changed their mind on herd immunity I think twice or three times in the past year. Del Bigtee caught that one. They changed, what constitutes a pandemic a while back as well. The Children;s Health Defense caught that one, if I remember correctly. I have that one somewhere, but at the moment I don’t have time to hunt it down. They said lockdowns were good and then lockdowns are bad. I have no idea their thoughts on that one today. They are probably back to saying lockdowna are good. They change things all the time. So one day they could say one thing and then latter change it. Anyway the video in question will be below the story. You might want to download that, if you can. It might vanish like so many other things vanish these days.

There are some studies etc on the dangers of mask wearing in the following post. The BC Parent did some homework and a few other studies/reports have been added as well. Even on most packages they say they do not protect you from viruses.

Message to BC Educators from a Concerned Parent

January 25, 2021

Written by John O’Sullivan

In a telling admission made on January 22, 2021, the World Health Organization now say there is no scientific medical reason for any healthy person to wear a mask outside of a hospital. Sadly, our corrupt politicians and mainstream media only relate the bad news.

If you do not have any respiratory symptoms, such as fever, cough, or runny nose, you do not need to wear a medical mask. When used alone, masks can give you a false feeling of protection and can even be a source of infection when not used correctly.

Watch the video of the press announcement at Source

Fauci said don’t wear a mask Now he says wear two of them

Fauci said don’t wear a mask Now he says wear two of them

WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce Massive COVID False Positives

So why are they saying this now? They knew is was all bogus from the begining.

Next they will be saying Covid has never been Isolated.

Court Rules that Enforced Wearing of Masks is ‘Unconstitutional’

Published on January 25, 2021

The police tribunal in Brussels issued a judgment on 12 January acquitting a man summoned for non-wearing of a mask, according to his lawyer, Hélène Alexandris. The judge concluded that the enforced wearing of the mask in public space was unconstitutional.

Medical Doctor: Bacterial Pneumonias Rising from Mask Wearing

Published on January 25, 2021

Steve Hilton Report: Dr. Anthony Fauci Is Directly Responsible with Funding the Gain-of-Function Studies that Resulted in Coronavirus Pandemic

HAFHAFJanuary 25, 2021

Deaths from the Covid vaccines in US are up more. So are the number of adverse affects and deaths elsehere..

PROFESSOR DOLORES CAHILL, PROFESSOR of TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH (FORSCHUNG) AND MOLECULAR GENETICS, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, predicts impending mass death from RNA vaccines

January 27, 2021

Horrific Latent Deaths Predicted Among The Elderly By Genetics Professor After Immunization With RNA Vaccines

Now when is comes to Tedros from WHO he is a criminal, headed to the ICC for crimes as noted in both posts below.

Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud and

Covid death, but not from Covid because of WHO?

Japan stopped giving vaccines, until the children were 2, if I remember correctly and with that SIDS stopped in their country.

During COVID Lockdown, Vaccine Rates Dropped — So Did the Number of SIDS Deaths

Just added January 26, 2021


Family doctor and former Minnesota State Senator Scott Jensen made waves last year when he was one of the first in his field to speak out about the number of #Covid19 deaths thought to be inflated by the CDC’s irregular, and loose, guidelines on diagnosing death from Covid. Now, as the number of deaths has surpassed 400,000 in the US, Dr. Jensen and lawmakers are calling for an audit of these deaths.

in the US they get $12,000 to $13,000 for patients admitted and testing positive for a COVID-19 diagnoses and another $39,000 again give or take, for those put on ventilators. Those number vary a bit from report to report.

If they have 161 covid patients, they get an extra $70,000 per patient. That one I just found out about via the video. Thank you Dr. Jensen. There should be an audit of deaths world wide, as death certificates were also changed in other countries as well. In the UK for example if you died 28 days after testing positive, you were counted as a covid death.

Las Vegas Schools Forced To Reopen Amid Rash Of Student Suicides 

Tyler Durden's Photoby Tyler DurdenTuesday, Jan 26, 2021 – 17:45

A surge of student suicides across Las Vegas has pushed the Clark County School District to reopen schools as soon as possible, according to NYTimes

By December, eighteen students in the district had taken their own lives; an early-warning mental health system embedded within computers and tablets issued to students for remote learning received 3,100 alerts since schools shuttered their doors last March. 

“When we started to see the uptick in children taking their lives, we knew it wasn’t just the Covid numbers we need to look at anymore,” said Jesus Jara, the Clark County superintendent.

“We have to find a way to put our hands on our kids, to see them, to look at them. They’ve got to start seeing some movement, some hope,” Jara said. 

Efforts to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 across the country have led to drastic changes in the way children and teens learn and socialize. 

Government data show a 24% increase in the number of children who arrived in emergency departments with mental health issues from mid-March through mid-October, compared with the same period in 2019. 

Countrywide, tens of millions of students have been thrown into a new distance learning environment that has resulted in many extracurricular activities being canceled. Recreational spaces have closed, sports canceled, and playdates shifted to Zoom calls, resulting in many kids developing mental issues, especially in Clark County. 

Clark County administrators had GoGuardian Beacon alert system installed on every device given out to students after the sixth student suicide last year. The system alerted administrators of more than 3,100 cases where a student searched suicide-related material between June and October.

In one instance, a 12-year boy searched “how to make a noose” on his iPad.” Administrators quickly reached out to the boy’s parents as he was about to hang himself. 

The alerts have been so disturbing to Jara that he doesn’t sleep near his phone anymore. 

“I can’t get these alerts anymore,” said Jara. “I have no words to say to these families anymore. I believe in God, but I can’t help but wonder: Am I doing everything possible to open our schools?”

Dr. Anthony Fauci has called for schools on a countrywide basis to reopen safely. 

An indirect consequence of the pandemic and forcing children to learn at home has contributed to a rise of mental health issues and suicides among America’s future generation.  Source

Another link about the same thing. Odd the WHO doesn’t talk about things like this much either.

The NYT Story Surge of Student Suicides Pushes Las Vegas Schools to Reopen

Forcing a Child to Wear a Mask is Child Abuse

Latest study

Mask Harms in Kids: 68% of Parents Report Alarming Psychological and Physical Problems In First-of-its-kind Study

There are a number of Petitions at the post below. For the UK, EU, Canada and the US

Questions you Ask all Governments before getting the Covid Vaccine

This may or may not still be there. I took a screen shot of it a while back. This is on the Ontario, Canada Gov web site.

CDC’s Vaccine Injury Reporting System ‘Temporarily Down’

January 27, 2021

Well at least people are finally going and looking at the data. Looks like it wen down due to many people going there.

Even if they only gets less then 1% of injuries and deaths. It is better then nothing.

Published in: on January 26, 2021 at 6:11 am  Comments (54)  

Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud

The Chinese Communist Party’s Global Lockdown Fraud

Request for expedited federal investigation into scientific fraud in COVID‑19 public health policies

The CCP’s Global Lockdown Fraud

Jan 10, 2021 ·69 min read


Federal Bureau of Investigation
935 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20535


U.K. Security Service (MI5);
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation;
Canadian Security Intelligence Service;
U.S. Department of Justice


Michael P. Senger, Attorney
Stacey A. Rudin, Attorney
Dr. Clare Craig, FRCPath
Retired Brig. Gen. Robert Spalding
Randy Hillier, MPP Lanark, Frontenac & Kingston
Francis Hoar, Barrister at Law
Sanjeev Sabhlok, PhD
Brian O’Shea
Maajid Nawaz
Simon Dolan

This open letter is available for download in PDF format at Scribd.

We are writing this letter to request that a federal investigation be commenced and/or expedited regarding the scientific debate on major policy decisions during the COVID-19 crisis. In the course of our work, we have identified issues of a potentially criminal nature and believe this investigation necessary to ensure the interests of the public have been properly represented by those promoting certain pandemic policies.

During times of crisis, citizens naturally turn to the advice of those they perceive as experts. In early 2020, the public turned to the advice of scientific authorities when confronted with an apparent viral outbreak. Soon after, most nations followed the advice of prominent scientists and implemented restrictions commonly referred to as “lockdowns.” While the policies varied by jurisdiction, in general they involved restrictions on gatherings and movements and the closure of schools, businesses, and public places, inspired by those imposed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Hubei Province. The intervention of federal authorities with police power may be required to ensure that those who have promoted these lockdown policies have done so in good faith.

This letter is meant to call the attention of federal authorities in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States (the “Nations”) to multiple points of evidence about the origin and historical precedent of lockdowns; the scientific literature and debate behind them; the provenance and quality of predominant COVID-19 testing protocols and models; the motivations, biases, and qualifications of certain prominent lockdown supporters; and the source of public-facing communications surrounding these policies.

1. Lockdowns Originated on the Order of Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, and Were Propagated Into Global Policy by the World Health Organization With Little Analysis or Logic

Lockdown proponents have frequently justified their policies by comparing them to actions taken to combat the pandemic of Spanish influenza a century prior.[1] But a realistic examination of the mitigation efforts in response to Spanish influenza reveals that nothing remotely approximating lockdowns was ever imposed. In the words of Judge William S. Stickman, ruling in Cnty. of Butler v. Wolf,[2] citing the work of preeminent historians:

Although this nation [the United States] has faced many epidemics and pandemics and state and local governments have employed a variety of interventions in response, there have never previously been lockdowns of entire populations — much less for lengthy and indefinite periods of time…[3] While, unquestionably, states and local governments restricted certain activities for a limited period of time to mitigate the Spanish Flu, there is no record of any imposition of a population lockdown in response to that disease or any other in our history.

Not only are lockdowns historically unprecedented in response to any previous epidemic or pandemic in American history, but they are not so much as mentioned in recent guidance offered by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). Judge Stickman continues:

Indeed, even for a ‘Very High Severity’ pandemic (defined as one comparable to the Spanish Flu), the guidelines provide only that ‘CDC recommends voluntary home isolation of ill persons,’ and ‘CDC might recommend voluntary home quarantine of exposed household members in areas where novel influenza circulates.’ Id. at 32, Table 10 (emphasis added). This is a far, far cry from a statewide lockdown…[4]

The fact is that the lockdowns imposed across the United States in early 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic are unprecedented in the history of our Commonwealth and our Country. They have never been used in response to any other disease in our history. They were not recommendations made by the CDC. They were unheard of by the people [of] this nation until just this year. It appears as though the imposition of lockdowns in Wuhan and other areas of China — a nation unconstrained by concern for civil liberties and constitutional norms — started a domino effect where one country, and state, after another imposed draconian and hitherto untried measures on their citizens. (emphasis added)

Judge Stickman’s intuition regarding the real history of lockdowns is in line with the opinion of the foremost infectious disease scholars. Donald Henderson, the man widely credited with eradicating smallpox, wrote in 2006, “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.”[5] To our knowledge, no scientist ever publicly supported imposing lockdowns until Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), personally authorized the “unprecedented lockdown of Wuhan and other cities beginning on Jan. 23.”[6]

General Secretary Xi is perhaps best known for the punishment of over one million CCP officials for “corruption,”[7] the elimination of term limits from China’s constitution,[8] and, of course, the reeducation and “quarantine[9] of over one million Uyghur Muslims and other minorities “infected with extremism[10] throughout the regions of Xinjiang and Tibet, pursuant to the CCP’s pet hybrid of public health and security policy: fangkong — the same policy that inspired Xi’s lockdown of Hubei province.[11] General Secretary Xi later affirmed that he had issued these instructions to the CCP’s Politburo Standing Committee on January 7, 2020,[12] but his instructions have never been revealed. Chinese business leader Ren Zhiqiang was sentenced to 18 years in prison[13] for an open letter in which he requested Xi’s instructions be made public.[14]

When the lockdown of Hubei province began, the World Health Organization (WHO)’s representative in China noted that “trying to contain a city of 11 million people is new to science… The lockdown of 11 million people is unprecedented in public health history…”[15] Human rights observers also expressed concerns.[16] But those concerns didn’t stop the WHO from effusively praising the CCP’s “unprecedented” response just days after the lockdown began, and long before it had produced any results: “The measures China has taken are good not only for that country but also for the rest of the world.”[17] WHO Director Tedros Adhanom added that he was personally “very impressed and encouraged by the president [Xi Jinping]’s detailed knowledge of the outbreak” and the next day praised China for “setting a new standard for outbreak response.”[18]

By February 2020, the CCP had begun reporting an exponential decline in COVID-19 cases. In its February report, the WHO waxed rhapsodic about China’s triumph:

General Secretary Xi Jinping personally directed and deployed the prevention and control work … China’s uncompromising and rigorous use of non-pharmaceutical measures to contain transmission of the COVID-19 virus in multiple settings provides vital lessons for the global response”[19] (emphasis added).

Shortly thereafter, the WHO held a press conference during which Assistant Director-General Bruce Aylward — who later disconnected a live interview when asked to acknowledge Taiwan[20] — told the press: “What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this. If you do it, you can save lives and prevent thousands of cases of what is a very difficult disease.”[21] (emphasis added). Two days later, in an interview for China Central Television (CCTV), Aylward put it bluntly: “Copy China’s response to COVID-19.”[22] (emphasis added).

The WHO’s recommendations are notable for two reasons. First, the WHO’s conclusion in its February report that this “rather unique and unprecedented public health response in China reversed the escalating cases”[23] exemplifies the fallacy of post hoc, ergo propter hoc. While it was possible that a more “flat” curve in Wuhan could be attributed to the CCP’s lockdown, it was at least equally likely that Wuhan had simply witnessed the natural course of this “novel” pathogen. It should have been obvious that the mere issuance of a policy “unprecedented in public health history” did not automatically mean it was effective — especially given the WHO’s own 2019 guidance for pandemic influenza did not advise border closures, mass contact tracing, or quarantine even of “exposed individuals” under any circumstance.[24]

Furthermore, the WHO did not even consider other countries’ economic circumstances, demographics, or even their number of COVID-19 cases — which were very few in most of the world — before instructing the entire world that “you have to do this.”[25] This conclusion by the world’s foremost public health body was, at best, criminally negligent.[26]

Lockdowns are a Xi Jinping policy, and the significance of that fact cannot be overstated. The idea of locking down an entire state or country and forcibly shutting down its businesses and public places was never entertained, never discussed, and never implemented in any pandemic literature until it was done by General Secretary Xi in January 2020. Lockdowns were never tried before 2020 and never tested before 2020, even on a theoretical basis.[27] The idea of “lockdown” was brought into human history on the order of General Secretary Xi; it otherwise never would have entered the collective human imagination. Anytime anyone endorses a lockdown for any length of time, even a few minutes, they are endorsing a Xi Jinping policy. The remainder of this letter concerns how lockdowns were laundered into the world’s go-to pandemic policy.

2. The Most Influential Institution for Covid-19 Models, Self-Described as “China’s Best Academic Partner in the West,” Has Been by Far the Most Alarmist and Inaccurate Covid-19 Modeler

In February 2020, a team from Imperial College London led by physicist Neil Ferguson ran a computer model that played an outsized role in justifying lockdowns in most countries. Imperial College forecast a number of potential outcomes, including that, by October 2020, more than 500,000 people in Great Britain and 2.2 million people in the U.S. would die as a result of COVID-19, and recommended months of strict social distancing measures to prevent this outcome.[28] The model also predicted the United States could incur up to one million deaths even with “enhanced social distancing” guidelines, including “shielding the elderly.”[29] In reality, by the end of October, according to the CDC and the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS), approximately 230,000 deaths[30] in the United States and 37,000 deaths[31] in the United Kingdom had been attributed to COVID-19 (though deaths from all other leading causes — including heart disease, cancer, and influenza — mysteriously declined,[32] indicating that even these low counts from the CDC and NHS are vastly overstated).

A study by researchers at UCLA and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) compared the accuracy of various institutions’ models predicting COVID-19 mortality.[33] Across all time periods, the models produced by Imperial College were measured to have far higher rates of error than the others — always erring on the side of being too high:

The 12-week median absolute percent errors (MAPE), reflecting models produced in July and August, ranged from 22.4% for the SIK-J Alpha model, to 79.9% for the Imperial model… The Delphi and LANL models from July underestimated mortality, with median percent errors of -5.6% and -8.3% at 6 weeks respectively, while Imperial tended to overestimate (+47.7%), and the remaining models were relatively unbiased… The Imperial model had larger errors, about 5-fold higher than other models by six weeks. This appears to be largely driven by the aforementioned tendency to overestimate mortality. At twelve weeks, MAPE values were lowest for the IHME-MS-SEIR (23.7%) model, while the Imperial model had the most elevated MAPE (98.8%)… In the most current models, the 6-week MAPE across models was 7.2%.

Imperial’s inaccuracy continued unabated. In October 2020, Imperial College’s model predicted the U.K. would experience 2,000 deaths per day by mid-December.[34] In fact, deaths per day in the U.K. never reached 400, per NHS.[35]

Five years earlier, on October 21, 2015, General Secretary Xi personally visited Imperial College London for the announcement of “a series of new UK-China education and research collaborations” including “nanotechnology, bioengineering… and public health.”[36] This was the only trip Xi ever made to the U.K. as General Secretary; the trip lasted just four days and involved just one university: Imperial College London.[37] In a speech welcoming General Secretary Xi and his wife, Peng Liyuan, a goodwill ambassador to the WHO, Imperial College President Alice Gast addressed the Chancellor of the Exchequer:

Chancellor, you have said that you aim to make the U.K. ‘China’s best partner in the west.’ Imperial College London strives to be just that, China’s best academic partner in the west… As China’s top research partner in the U.K., Imperial’s academics and students benefit from collaboration on a daily basis.[38] (emphasis added)

In 2019, Gast became part of the notably pro-China[39] World Economic Forum’s AI Council along with Chinese AI Expert and venture capitalist Kai-Fu Lee, and to this day, Imperial College continues to advertise itself as “UK’s number one university collaborator with Chinese research institutions.”[40]

In March 2020, Imperial College produced a report titled “Evidence of initial success for China exiting COVID-19 social distancing policy after achieving containment,” concluding:

For the first time since the outbreak began there have been no new confirmed cases caused by local transmission in China reported for five consecutive days up to 23 March 2020. This is an indication that the social distancing measures enacted in China have led to control of COVID-19 in China… after very intense social distancing which resulted in containment, China has successfully exited their stringent social distancing policy to some degree.[41]

Imperial College had no way of knowing if this was, in fact, true — failing to discover cases does not mean they do not exist, particularly with a virus that is fatal to hardly anyone except the most vulnerable, and a regime with a long history of fraud— and its conclusion directly contradicted that of the U.S. intelligence community around the same time that China had intentionally misrepresented its coronavirus numbers.[42] In a December interview, Neil Ferguson recalled how China had inspired his lockdown recommendations to the U.K.’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE):

I think people’s sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March… It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… And then Italy did it. And we realised we could… If China had not done it, the year would have been very different.[43]

In a time of panic, it’s natural for the public to focus on the worst possible outcomes. Thus, a prestigious institution producing particularly alarmist models can have an outsized impact on political discourse. In this case, the institution in question not only consistently and egregiously erred in just one direction — the “tendency to overestimate mortality” — but also had a special relationship with China as its “best academic partner in the west.”

3. Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came from China

In early March 2020, the WHO released COVID-19 provider guidance documents to healthcare workers.[44] The guidance recommended escalating quickly to mechanical ventilation as an early intervention for treating COVID-19 patients, a departure from past experience during respiratory-virus epidemics.[45] In doing so, they cited the guidance being presented by Chinese journal articles, which published papers in January and February claiming that “Chinese expert consensus” called for “invasive mechanical ventilation” as the “first choice” for people with moderate to severe respiratory distress,[46] in part to protect medical staff. As the Wall Street Journal later reported:

Last spring, doctors put patients on ventilators partly to limit contagion at a time when it was less clear how the virus spread, when protective masks and gowns were in short supply. Doctors could have employed other kinds of breathing support devices that don’t require risky sedation, but early reports suggested patients using them could spray dangerous amounts of virus into the air, said Theodore Iwashyna, a critical-care physician at University of Michigan and Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in Ann Arbor, Mich.

At the time, he said, doctors and nurses feared the virus would spread through hospitals. “We were intubating sick patients very early. Not for the patients’ benefit, but in order to control the epidemic and to save other patients,” Dr. Iwashyna said “That felt awful.”[47] (emphasis added)

In New York and other cities, early and often ventilator use became a common theme, and it had devastating consequences for patients.[48] On March 31, 2020, Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, who had been caring for ICU patients at one of the hardest-hit hospitals in New York City, acted as an early whistleblower, sounding the alarm about the ventilator issue in a widely-shared video:

We are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue… I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time… I don’t know the final answer to this disease, but I’m quite sure that a ventilator is not it… This method being widely adopted at this very moment at every hospital in the country … is actually doing more harm than good.[49]

An April Reuters interview with dozens of medical specialists made it clear that mechanical ventilator overuse had become a global issue: “Many highlighted the risks from using the most invasive types of them — mechanical ventilators — too early or too frequently, or from non-specialists using them without proper training in overwhelmed hospitals.”[50]

By May 2020, it was common knowledge in the medical community that early ventilator use was hurting, not helping, COVID-19 patients, and that less invasive measures were in fact very effective in assisting recoveries.[51] A New York City study found a 97.2% mortality rate among those over age 65 who received mechanical ventilation.[52] The “early action” ventilator guidance that the WHO distributed to the world killed thousands of innocent patients; the WHO obtained that guidance from China.

4. The World’s Predominant, Wildly-Inaccurate PCR Testing Protocols Are Based on Incomplete, Theoretical Genome Sequences Supplied by China

Virologists Victor Corman and Christian Drosten led the exceptionally-rapid creation of the first COVID-19 PCR test (the “Corman-Drosten Protocol”);[53] it is now the most commonly-used testing protocol in the world for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus which may, in certain cases, lead to the disease COVID-19. (As discussed infra, the Court of Appeal of Lisbon concluded that this PCR test was producing as many as 97% false positives). Corman and Drosten were provided with the in silico (theoretical) genome sequences used to create their PCR protocol by Chinese scientists including Yong-Zhen Zhang and Shi Zhengli, Director at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[54] (These genome sequences were then posted to the open-source depository on January 10, 2020). The Corman-Drosten Protocol was submitted to the WHO on January 13,[55] eight days prior to the date it was submitted to the medical journal Eurosurveillance for “peer review.”[56]

The WHO released the Corman-Drosten Protocol on January 21, the same day it was submitted to Eurosurveillance.[57] Drosten sits on the board of Eurosurveillance, a conflict of interest.[58] The Corman-Drosten Protocol was accepted[59] by Eurosurveillance the very next day, January 22 (the same day the WHO confirmed human-to-human transmission),[60] an extraordinarily quick turnaround; peer review for scientific journals is an intensive process requiring identification of, and action by, external reviewers, which typically takes weeks to months. Of all 1,595 publications at Eurosurveillance since 2015, not one other research paper was reviewed and accepted in fewer than 20 days.[61] Eurosurveillance’s peer review process also requires an author declaration that no conflicts of interest exist, which was, in this case, a false statement.[62] This extraordinarily quick turnaround made it impossible for any other PCR protocol to be published before the Corman-Drosten Protocol, which was published on PubMed on January 23,[63] giving it a valuable “first-mover” advantage ensuring that it became the predominant PCR protocol in the world.

The molecular biologist Pieter Borger and his team submitted a retraction request for the Corman-Drosten PCR protocol.[64] According to Borger’s report, the Corman-Drosten PCR test workflow contains multiple, fatal errors. The most glaring issue is the fact that, at the time the protocol was submitted, there was no good reason to believe widespread PCR testing would even be necessary:

The authors introduce the background for their scientific work as: “The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travelers does already occur.

According to BBC News[65] and Google Statistics[66] there were 6 deaths world-wide on January 21st 2020 — the day when the manuscript was submitted. Why did the authors assume a challenge for public health laboratories while there was no substantial evidence at that time to indicate that the outbreak was more widespread than initially thought? (emphasis added)

Borger’s report goes on to specify ten major flaws with the Corman-Drosten protocol, the biggest issue being the fact that the entire test is based on in silico (theoretical) sequences supplied by China:

The first and major issue is that the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (in the publication named 2019-nCoV and in February 2020 named SARS-CoV-2 by an international consortium of virus experts) is based on in silico sequences, supplied by a laboratory in China,[67] because at the time neither control material of infectious (“live”) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 nor isolated genomic RNA of the virus was available to the authors. To date no validation has been performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full length RNA thereof.

In addition, the primers and probes in Drosten’s protocol are incomplete and non-specific; the primer concentrations are four to five times too high; the GC content (connection strength) is far too low; the annealing temperature difference in primer pairs is up to five times too high; the PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level, rendering the test useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify SARS-CoV-2; and — given the protocol was accepted for publication just one day after it was submitted to Eurosurveillance — it was obviously never subjected to any meaningful peer review.

Corman and Drosten’s PCR protocol thus has every indications of being fraudulent.

In June, a peer-reviewed study was published comparing the accuracy of the COVID-19 PCR test protocols on the short list recommended by the WHO. The PCR protocol developed by the CDC (the N2 US CDC protocol)[68] — likewise based on in silico genome sequences supplied by China — fared little better than the Corman-Drosten protocol:

The E Charité [Corman-Drosten] and N2 US CDC assays were positive for all specimens, including negative samples and negative controls (water).[69]

Together, these two PCR protocols account for the vast majority of COVID-19 PCR tests conducted in the Nations.[70] Both rely on in silico sequences from China, and both produce wildly inaccurate results, testing positive for all specimens including negative samples and plain water.

5. Predominant, Excessive PCR Testing Protocols Came from China

In accordance with recommendations by the WHO and other public health authorities, countless laboratories have engaged in mass PCR testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.[71] Fundamental to PCR testing is the concept of “cycle thresholds.” The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from a virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious. Thus, the higher the PCR cycle threshold, the lower the amount of viral load needed to trigger a positive PCR test.

If the PCR cycle threshold indicating a “positive” is set too high, a positive result may not even indicate any meaningful amount of live viral particles. As Dr. Anthony Fauci mentioned in a July 2020 interview, a cycle threshold of 35 or more should not be considered a positive result:

What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard … if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule… So, I thinkif somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.[72](emphasis added)

The WHO published its currently-outstanding guidance on laboratory testing for COVID-19 on March 19, 2020.[73] The WHO’s guidance contained only three studies discussing PCR cycle thresholds. All three studies[74] are from China and use cycle thresholds from 37 to 40: “A cycle threshold value (Ct-value) less than 37 was defined as a positive test, and a Ct-value of 40 or more was defined as a negative test.”[75]

As described by the New York Times, most laboratories and manufacturers in the United States now set their cutoff for a positive PCR test from 37 to 40 cycle thresholds: “Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.”[76] At 37 cycles, any viral RNA or DNA will have been amplified over 68 billion times, and at 40 cycles it will have been amplified over 500 billion times.

Doctors interviewed by the New York Times agreed with Dr. Fauci that anything above 35 cycle thresholds is too sensitive. “A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35,” said Juliet Morrison, virologist at UC Riverside. Dr. Michael Mina, epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said he would set the figure at 30, or even less. Using current testing standards with 37 to 40 cycle thresholds:

In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found… In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90 percent of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said. ‘I would say that none of those people should be contact-traced, not one,’ he said.[77] (emphasis added).

In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeal of Lisbon concluded: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”[78] The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.”[79]

The court cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” showing that if someone tested positive for COVID-19 at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chance of that person actually being infected is less than 3%, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”[80]

To summarize, based on guidance issued by the WHO citing three studies from China, laboratories and manufacturers across the United States and many other countries are using a PCR cycle threshold of 37 to 40 for COVID-19 PCR tests that were created using in silico genome sequences supplied by a laboratory in China, pursuant to which positive COVID-19 case counts have been inflated as much as ten- to thirty-fold.[81]

6. Studies Showing Significant Asymptomatic Transmission, the Only Scientific Basis for Lockdowns of Healthy Individuals, Came from China

Underpinning the policy of “lockdown” is the scientific concept of “asymptomatic spread.” According to the WHO, “Early data from China suggested that people without symptoms could infect others.”[82] This idea of asymptomatic spread was reflected in the WHO’s February report.[83] According to this concept, healthy individuals, or “silent spreaders” might be responsible for a significant number of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions.[84] The idea of setting out to stop asymptomatic spread was a significant departure from prevailing public health guidance and experience during prior respiratory-virus pandemics.[85]

The concept of significant asymptomatic spread was believed to be a novel and unique feature of SARS-CoV-2 based on several studies performed in China.[86] Multiple studies from other countries could not find any transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from asymptomatic individuals.[87]

A paper from McGill University concluded that “transmission in the asymptomatic period was documented in numerous studies,” but every one of those studies was conducted in China; where studies outside of China have tried to replicate these findings, they have failed.[88] An Italian study concluded that two asymptomatic individuals who tested positive had been infected by two other asymptomatic individuals, but this was based on 2,800 PCR tests; given the false-positive rate discussed above, the conclusion is dubious.[89] An influential study from Brunei Darussalam found significant asymptomatic spread,[90] but its findings are considerably weakened by a poor case definition; its two findings of asymptomatic spread were that of a young girl with no symptoms who allegedly spread SARS-CoV-2 to her teacher who had “a mild cough on one day,” and a father who remained asymptomatic but whose wife briefly had a runny nose and whose baby also had a mild cough one day.[91]

A German study co-authored by Christian Drosten claimed to have found “Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany,”[92] but the researchers didn’t actually speak to the woman before they published the paper, and officials later confirmed that she did, in fact, have symptoms while in Germany.[93]

Absent this concept of significant asymptomatic spread, there is no scientific case for locking down healthy persons. This concept of significant asymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and the studies backing it, came from China.

7. The CCP Engaged in an Early, Broad, Systematic, and Global Propaganda Campaign to Promote Its Lockdown Response

After concluding the CCP’s lockdowns had “reversed the escalating cases” in China, the WHO was not alone in imploring the world to “Copy China’s response to COVID-19.” Beginning the same day the CCP locked down Hubei province, “leaked” videos from Wuhan began flooding international social media sites including Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube — all of which are blocked in China — purporting to show the horrors of Wuhan’s epidemic and the seriousness of its lockdown, in scenes likened to Zombieland and The Walking Dead.[94] Official Chinese accounts widely shared an image of a hospital wing supposedly constructed in one day, but which actually showed an apartment 600 miles away.[95]

Then, beginning in March 2020, the entire world was bombarded with propaganda extolling the virtues of China’s heavy-handed approach.[96] Chinese state media bought numerous Facebook ads[97] advertising China’s pandemic response (all of which ran without Facebook’s required political disclaimer), and began erroneously describing “herd immunity” — the inevitable endpoint of every epidemic either by naturally-acquired immunity[98] or vaccination — as a “strategy” violating “human rights.”[99] Sweden, whose leaders were unique in foregoing lockdowns, became a primary target of the CCP’s propaganda campaign.[100] In the words of China’s state-run Global Times:

Chinese analysts and netizens doubt herd immunity and called it a violation of human rights, citing high mortality in the country compared to other Northern European countries. “So-called human rights, democracy, freedom are heading in the wrong direction in Sweden, and countries that are extremely irresponsible do not deserve to be China’s friend …”[101]

That was, of course, before the WHO adopted the bold, contradictory strategy of attempting to rewrite the historical definition of herd immunity wholesale. As recently as June 2020, the WHO’s definition of herd immunity had properly included “immunity developed through previous infection”—but on October 15, 2020, the WHO effectively erased the eons-long history of naturally-acquired immunity from its website:

‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.

Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.[102] (emphasis added)

China’s official spokesperson, Hua Chunying, posted a video of a 7-year-old girl reciting the importance of strict social distancing among children.[103] Simultaneously, hundreds of thousands of clandestine social media posts, which were later flagged as state-sponsored, expressed admiration for China’s lockdowns and longed for governments around the world to emulate them, while denigrating governments and world leaders who failed to follow suit;[104] governments including, but not limited to: Nigeria,[105] Ghana,[106] South Africa,[107] Namibia,[108] Kenya,[109] France,[110] Spain,[111] Colombia,[112] Brazil,[113] Argentina,[114] Canada,[115] Australia,[116] India,[117] Germany,[118] the United Kingdom,[119] and the United States.[120] Not only is this very poor global citizenship, but especially in light of the dubious science discussed above, it’s worth wondering whether these social media posts were intended to popularize lockdowns as the end in themselves.[121]

When Italy became the first country outside China to lock down, Chinese experts arrived on March 12 and two days later advised a tighter lockdown: “There are still too many people and behaviors on the street to improve.”[122] On March 19, they repeated that Italy’s lockdown was “not strict enough.” “Here in Milan, the hardest hit area by COVID-19, there isn’t a very strict lockdown … We need every citizen to be involved in the fight of COVID-19 and follow this policy.”[123]

Chinese company DJI donated drones to 22 U.S. states to help enforce lockdown rules.[124] Months later, DJI was blacklisted by the U.S. for having “enabled wide-scale human rights abuses within China through abusive genetic collection and analysis or high-technology surveillance, and/or facilitated the export of items by China that aid repressive regimes …”[125] On July 7, FBI Director Christopher Wray disclosed that the CCP even specifically approached local politicians to endorse its pandemic response:

[W]e have heard from federal, state, and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels. Not that long ago, we had a state senator who was recently even asked to introduce a resolution supporting China’s response to the pandemic.[126]

China has financial stakes in virtually every top media outlet.[127] With regard to complex issues like lockdowns, China’s influence can collectively tip these media entities in a dangerous direction, such as encouraging countries to copy China’s response to COVID-19.[128] The CCP has shaped the media’s scientific narratives by consistently promoting the falsehood that “China controlled the virus,”[129] which is, of course, a baldfaced lie.[130] Nonetheless, by encouraging mainstream publications to repeat the lie that “China controlled the virus,” the CCP has normalized this lie and ensured its forged data remains integral to scientific discourse.[131] Meanwhile, the CCP began closely monitoring Chinese academic publications on COVID-19.[132]

The significance of China’s global lockdown propaganda campaign is the intent behind it. While the scientific issues described above — criminal negligence by the WHO, alarmist mortality models, dubious PCR tests, and bad studies on asymptomatic transmission — could theoretically be attributed to incompetence, the CCP’s propaganda is evidence of deliberation. Sloppy science may be professionally shameful, but it is neither a crime nor a moral failing. The possibility of corruption and fraud, on the other hand, is another matter.

8. Many Prominent Pro-Lockdown Scientists Show Conspicuous Pro-China Bias

Not only were lockdowns laundered into science with a shocking lack of scientific debate, but many scientists have shown an unusual deference to China in evaluating the continuation of lockdown policies. These scientists have continuously praised China, and many appear to be operating on the assumption that China has, in fact, eliminated domestic COVID-19 cases as the CCP claims, when in fact this claim is a lie, as confirmed by the intelligence community.[133] Needless to say, promoting major public policy decisions based on this mistaken assumption can have devastating consequences.

In a May 2020 interview for China Central Television, Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of the esteemed medical journal The Lancet, emphatically praised China’s lockdowns:

It was not only the right thing to do, but it also showed other countries how they should respond in the face of such an acute threat. So, I think we have a great deal to thank China for …[134]

In July, Horton reiterated his gratitude toward China, tweeting: “Indeed. China should not be ‘blamed’. In my view, we should thank Chinese scientists and health workers for their incredibly selfless commitment to attacking this outbreak. They deserve our unconditional gratitude.”[135] And in August, Horton doubled down again in a full-throated piece that had surprisingly little to do with health:

The “century of humiliation,” when China was dominated by a colonially-minded west and Japan, only came to an end with the Communist victory in the civil war in 1949 … Every contemporary Chinese leader, including Xi Jinping, has seen their task as protecting the territorial security won by Mao and the economic security achieved by Deng.[136]

On October 8, the Lancet published a ringing endorsement of China’s pandemic response: China’s successful control of COVID-19.[137] This article was met with high praise by Chen Weihua, China Daily EU Bureau Chief:

Despite ignorance by many in the West, this article by The Lancet is a powerful endorsement of China’s successful pandemic response. Hate to read stories by those paparazzi journalists who are experts at spinning but have little knowledge of science.[138]

Chinese scientists later submitted an article to The Lancet arguing that SARS-CoV-2 originated in India, in the midst of ongoing border skirmishes with India.[139] Just weeks later, however, the party line changed again amid economic tensions with Australia, and Global Times claimed the coronavirus may have come from Australia.[140]

William A. Haseltine, Chairman of the Board of the US-China Health Summit since 2015, has also reserved great praise for China. In October 2020, China Daily syndicated a column from Haseltine in which he towed the CCP’s party line on Sweden, chastising the country for choosing to “forego lockdowns” and base its strategy on “herd immunity,” for which he falsely states that Sweden’s “COVID-19 infection and fatality rates were among the world’s highest”:

But to base a pandemic-response strategy on the assumption that herd immunity is inevitable-vaccine or no vaccine-is to afford a virus a path of least resistance. That was the case in Sweden, where policymakers decided to forego lockdowns and business closures in favor of more lenient advisories on mask-wearing and social distancing. Unsurprisingly, Sweden’s subsequent COVID-19 infection and fatality rates were among the world’s highest.[141]

Early in the pandemic, on March 25, Haseltine also praised China’s measures in contrast to the United States, most of which had yet to impose lockdowns: “The measures the US is taking to control Covid-19 are far inferior to what was done in China according to @JNBPage in @WSJ — For more details see an interview quarantine of an American in Shanghai —”[142] Later that day, Haseltine continued: “Two months of lockdown in Hubei province in China has been lifted, although Wuhan remains under quarantine until April 8. This is an important moment, and testament to the effectiveness of containment measures.”[143] Haseltine praised China again on May 20: “It is possible to eliminate Covid without effective drugs or vaccines. This is how they did it in Wuhan, China.”[144]

On June 4, Haseltine again compared the U.S. negatively to China: “The steps China has taken to protect its population through testing and tracking is truly impressive. The US, on the other hand, is failing.”[145] And again on September 15: “Has the US has done [sic] all it can to control Covid-19? Covid can be contained without a vaccine or drug. China now has near zero new infections. ACCESS Health & the @RockefellerFdn explored how they did it with the use of digital technologies.”[146]

Tom Frieden, former director of the CDC, is another prominent advocate of COVID-19 lockdowns. In 2015, “Frieden praised the public health partnership between China and the United States,” according to Global Times.[147] In 2017, Frieden joined China in backing Tedros Adhanom as director of the WHO over the United Kingdom’s eminently-qualified David Nabarro: “Tedros is an excellent choice to lead WHO. He succeeded in Ethiopia, making remarkable health progress…”[148] To the contrary, as was widely-known at the time, Tedros had helped Ethiopia’s regime cover up three cholera epidemics during his time as Ethiopia’s Minister of Public Health.[149] As a senior member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), designated a terrorist organization by the United States in the 1990s, Tedros “was a crucial decision maker in relation to security service actions that included killing, arbitrarily detaining and torturing Ethiopians” and was “personally responsible for brutal repression of the Amhara people, using aid money selectively to starve them out and deny them access to basic services,” — war crimes for which charges of genocide have recently been submitted against him at the International Criminal Court at the Hague.[150]

Frieden traveled extensively throughout China in 2018 and 2019 for public health collaborations, and he has heaped praise on China since the COVID-19 crisis began.[151] Frieden praised China’s response early on, writing for CNN on February 25: “China’s extraordinary cordon of Hubei province and other areas bought the world at least a month of lead time to prepare.”[152] In an April interview, Frieden told China Global Television (CGTN): “There’s a lot the world can learn from China on stopping COVID-19.”[153]

On March 17, Frieden urged the U.S. to emulate China’s expansion of hospital capacity: “When @voxdotcom posted this yesterday I thought hospitals might need to triple their beds and ventilators for pts with #COVID19. Now data suggests we may need as much as 10x more. China built 1K bed hospitals in 8 days, urgent action needed in US now.”[154]

On April 1, Frieden tweeted the same words three times, praising China and urging the U.S. to ramp up its response: “I’m angry. Friends & neighbors sick & dying. 2.9: days Wuhan’s action bought China: 2.9: number of MONTHS squandered by US not ramping up protection of HCW, critical care, testing, contact tracing, isolation, quarantine. Roadmap:”[155]

In August, Frieden praised China several times, contrasting its “success” with that of the U.S. On August 10: “Meanwhile in China. They report they can now do 4.8M PCR tests/day. Schools are opening and staying open. Mask-wearing is, where appropriate, nearly universal. Last week, they had an average of 34 cases/day. That’s a case rate less than 1/5,000th that of the US.”[156] On August 15: “This reflection from an American teaching in Chengdu — where Covid lockdowns were strictly enforced — examines the nuances of life in China and how the country was able to crush the curve.”[157] And on August 16: “Thoughts about huge, unmasked crowds at festivals in Wuhan!? Well, that’s the reward for crushing the curve — you get back to near pre-Covid reality. But that’s probably not a reasonable goal for most places, where simmering control is a realistic best-case scenario.”[158] And on August 18: “China reported a case rate less than 1/5,000th of the US’. It’s possible for us to control Covid too if Americans work together and fully support public health.”[159]

While these individuals are unique in their pro-China, pro-lockdown bias, as scientists they’re far from alone in their apparent ties to the CCP. In June, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) disclosed that 189 of its grantees had received undisclosed funding from foreign governments.[160] In 93% of cases, including that of Charles Lieber, chair of Harvard’s chemistry department, the undisclosed funding came from China.[161] The co-founders of CanSino Biologics, a Chinese vaccine company collaborating with Canada, were found to be members of the CCP’s Thousand Talents Plan for co-opting and incentivizing scientists to transfer research and knowledge to China.[162] According to the Harvard Crimson, the largest gift in the history of Harvard’s Chan School of Public Health came in part from a “pawn of the CCP,” a “cheerleader for a government responsible for significant humanitarian crises” through a series of shell companies, the largest of which was named in the Panama Papers.[163]

There is nothing immoral or illegal about merely being wrong. But given the magnitude of the decisions being made during the COVID-19 crisis, if even a handful of influential scientists are cross-incentivized to support lockdowns regardless of any real data or results, this can have an outsized impact on both public opinion and policy.

9. Many Other Influential Lockdown Supporters Are Both Woefully Unqualified to Be Advising World Leaders on Pandemic Policy and Often Show Conspicuous Pro-China Bias

In addition to the many scientists with ties to China, a number of woefully unqualified individuals have held themselves out to the public and politicians as experts with regard to COVID-19 epidemiology and lockdowns, when in fact their backgrounds reveal them to have no such expertise. Many of these, too, have shown unusual deference to China.

On January 25, 2020, Eric Feigl-Ding, an epidemiologist in Harvard’s nutrition department with little background in infectious disease, wrote, “HOLY MOTHER OF GOD, the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!! How bad is that reproductive R0 value? It is thermonuclear pandemic level bad.”[164] This was the first of a months-long series of dubious, but widely-shared, alarmist tweets by the previously unknown Ding, by virtue of which he gained hundreds of thousands of Twitter followers and became one of the leading advocates of strict COVID-19 mandates, despite his evident lack of qualifications.[165]

Ding is an alumnus of the World Economic Forum’s Global Shapers, a group of young people that considers Taiwan a part of Greater China[166] and has campaigned during the COVID-19 crisis to share “their personal experiences of combating the coronavirus in their cities and of adapting to a new normal.”[167] His enormous Twitter following irked many of his colleagues, prompting prominent Harvard epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch to denounce him as a charlatan: “OK lots of people think this is an intramural tiff. In the sense that we have been working @CCDD_HSPH for a decade and at @HarvardEpi for 25y to establish ID epidemiology as a field of excellence & we don’t like a charlatan exploiting a tenuous connection for self-promotion, yes.”[168]

Columbia virologist Angela Rasmussen agreed with Dr. Lipsitch’s assessment: “Eric Feigl-Ding is a charlatan. If Dr. Lipsitch sounds condescending, it’s because EFD has repeatedly claimed expertise he doesn’t have in order to get attention. He sensationalizes data and distributes outright misinformation. He’s harmful to public health and I disdain that too.”[169]

These denunciations by Drs. Rasmussen and Lipsitch are noteworthy in that both have supported limited lockdowns and criticized both pro- and anti-lockdown scientists and commentators. However, their denunciations of Ding have not slowed down his Twitter campaign, and he has continued to present himself in attire worn by a medical doctor, completely inappropriate to his background as a nutritionist.[170]

Tomas Pueyo is an engineer and MBA with no background in health or epidemiology who came to sudden fame for a March 10 article on the self-publishing site Medium titled “Coronavirus: Why You Must Act Now,” in which he implored leaders around the world to implement lockdowns on China’s model to counter rising COVID-19 cases. “The total number of cases grew exponentially until China contained it. But then, it leaked outside, and now it’s a pandemic that nobody can stop.”[171] (emphasis added)

Pueyo’s article quickly went viral and was shared hundreds of thousands of times, including by many celebrities.[172] After it went viral, Pueyo went on tour advising state legislators on implementing lockdowns.[173]

Not only was Pueyo unqualified to be dispatching this type of epidemiological advice to world leaders, but Pueyo’s March 10 article contains a number of red flags. First, Pueyo several times refers to the coronavirus as a “pandemic.” However, as of March 10, the WHO had not yet declared the coronavirus a pandemic,[174] and per the article, cases accounted for less than 0.0015% of the world’s population. In the article, Pueyo then goes on to implore leaders:

But in 2–4 weeks, when the entire world is in lockdown, when the few precious days of social distancing you will have enabled will have saved lives, people won’t criticize you anymore: They will thank you for making the right decision. (emphasis added)

Not only was the coronavirus not yet a pandemic, but as of March 10 there were fewer than 200 cases in the entire developing world outside China. Pueyo had no good reason to call the coronavirus a pandemic, no good reason to believe the entire world would be in lockdown in two to four weeks, and, above all, no good reason to be advising world leaders to lock down.

On March 19, Pueyo posted another Medium article titled “The Hammer and Dance,” which again went viral, explaining the strategy Pueyo described as “the Hammer” — quick, aggressive lockdowns when outbreaks occur — followed by “the Dance” — tracing, surveillance, and quarantine measures.[175]

On March 22, three days after Pueyo’s “The Hammer and Dance” was published, a strategy paper by the German Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) entitled “How to get a grip on COVID-19” (later dubbed “the Panic Paper”) was secretly distributed to members of German parliament and leaders of certain media outlets — this paper played an outsized role in encouraging the German government to implement a nationwide lockdown in March 2020.[176] After the BMI refused to release the Panic Paper to the public under the Freedom of Information Act, it was leaked by FragDenStaat, a whistleblower site.[177]

Despite being published just three days after Pueyo’s article, the Panic Paper relied heavily on Pueyo’s work, referring to the strategy of intermittent lockdowns and surveillance as the “Hammer and Dance” without citing Pueyo. The term “Hammer and Dance” has no history in epidemiology — Tomas Pueyo invented it for his March 19 article.[178]

Otto Kölbl is one of the authors of the Panic Paper.[179] Kölbl has been “researching socio-economic development in China and (comparatively) in other developing countries as well as their presentation in the Western media” since 2007.[180] From 2005 to 2006 he was a language teacher at Northwestern Polytechnical University in Xi’an, China. He now runs his own blog called “” in which he has described Hong Kong as “parasitic”[181] and praised China’s exemplary development of Tibet.[182] Like Pueyo, Kölbl is extraordinarily unqualified to be advising world leaders on any aspect of epidemiology, infectiology, or public health, fields in which he has no background.

Maximilian Mayer is another co-author of the Panic Paper.[183] Mayer taught at the University of Nottingham in Ningbo China and Tongji University in Shanghai, and was a research fellow at Renmin University Beijing.[184] Mayer’s research interests include China’s foreign and energy policy, climate politics, and international relations, and he edited Rethinking the Silk-Road: China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Emerging Eurasian Relations.[185]He has since returned to Bonn University as a junior professor of international relations.[186] Like Pueyo and Kölbl, Mayer lacks any apparent qualification in epidemiology, infectiology, or public health, the fields on which he advised Germany’s leaders via the Panic Paper.

From the earliest possible date, physicist Yaneer Bar-Yam has urged the entire world to adopt the strategy of attempting to eliminate COVID-19 entirely as China had supposedly done through the global adoption of strict social distancing measures. On February 2, Bar-Yam praised China’s supposed rapid construction of a hospital: “Hospital built in days in China is now operational.”[187] On February 28, Bar-Yam quoted the WHO’s report from its China Joint Mission which sent the world into lockdown: “China’s uncompromising and rigorous use of non-pharmaceutical measures to contain transmission of the COVID-19 virus in multiple settings provides vital lessons for the global response.”[188] That same day, Bar-Yam continued “We should all acknowledge and thank China for their aggressive response to the Wuhan coronavirus. This includes stopping almost all travel of their citizens to the world to prevent contagion elsewhere.”[189] In February, Bar-Yam launched the website, which was soon translated into 17 languages, urging countries around the world to implement Wuhan-style lockdowns.[190]

Bar-Yam has spent the better part of a year admiring China’s lockdowns — including the CCP’s murderous lockdown in Xinjiang — and promoting the use of China’s data despite allegations of fraud. On July 18, Bar-Yam praised China’s “wartime” lockdown in Xinjiang: “17 new cases, shut the city down. Don’t give it a chance. China coronavirus: ‘Wartime state’ declared for Urumqi in Xinjiang.”[191] This same lockdown simultaneously caused incredible concern among human rights watchers and activists due to the CCP’s concomitant acts of genocide in Xinjiang against Uyghur Muslims and other Turkic minorities.[192]

On March 8, Bar-Yam defended China’s data, in contrast to the U.S.: “Actually, the numbers in the US are underreported because of limited testing. This is known. Many said the numbers in China are underreported, nobody has shown evidence. If you have it show it or take a seat.”[193] Bar-Yam reiterated this sentiment on March 14: “Speculations about the problems in China with data are projections.”[194] On March 29, Bar-Yam encouraged the U.S. to emulate China: “We need a much wider restriction. Still, China used such a strategy effectively.”[195] And, on August 3, Bar-Yam congratulated China: “Successful outbreak response: China’s manufacturing activity surges in July.”[196]

During crises, citizens trust experts with major policy decisions. For individuals to hold themselves out to the public and their leaders as experts in a crisis when they lack the necessary qualifications is bad enough; if they are somehow cross-incentivized to do so, it’s much worse.

10. Several Top National Health Officials Among the Nations Are Woefully Unqualified and Show Conspicuous Pro-China Bias

Canada’s top health minister, Patty Hajdu, has no apparent background in infectiology or epidemiology, her only public health experience being in substance abuse and injury prevention.[197] Hajdu’s admiration for China goes back some time — in 2014 she advised: “Don’t believe everything you read. Chinese sunset story pure propaganda,” sharing an article arguing that stories of China broadcasting a sunset in Beijing were false.[198] Hajdu first earned the praise of Chinese foreign spokesperson Hua Chunying in early February 2020 for refusing to ban travel from China: “Canada believes the ban of entry has no basis, which is a sharp contrast for the U.S. behaviours.”[199]

In April, Hajdu defended China’s COVID-19 case data: “There is no indication the data that came out of China in terms of their death rate and infection rate was falsified in any way.”[200] When a reporter pointed out a U.S. intelligence report to the contrary, Hajdu scolded: “I would say your question is feeding into conspiracy theories that many people have been perpetuating on the internet.”[201] After that early April exchange, Hajdu was excoriated in Canada’s press for “effectively trying to gaslight her own citizens about the conduct of a habitually oppressive and untruthful regime.”[202] But Hajdu ignored that coverage and quickly doubled down just one month later, praising China’s “historic containment efforts.”[203]

Hajdu continued into September, again earning aplomb from CGTN for defending China: “very early on China alerted the World Health Organization to the emergence of a novel coronavirus and also shared the sequencing of the gene which allowed countries to be able to rapidly produce tests to be able to detect it in their own countries.”[204] For this, Chen Weihua, China Daily EU Bureau Chief, praised Hajdu: “Canadian Health Minister Hajdu is a role model. She is a disappointment to those paparazzi journalists and fearmongers.”[205]

Hajdu even earned a special nod from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs: “We noticed relevant reports and applaud the Canadian health minister’s objective and fair remarks.”[206]

As commentator Spencer Fernando pointed out, “Propaganda Patty … appears to be one of the only people on Earth who actually believes China’s official virus numbers.”[207] Apparently unrepentant, Hajdu again scolded a journalist questioning data, echoing her April sentiments: “Mr. Speaker, do you know what will help Canadians’ lives? If the member opposite and the leader of the opposition stop their members from sharing fake and dangerous news like the member from Lethridge and the member of Carleton stay focused on saving lives of Canadians instead of spreading conspiracy theories.”[208]

Matt Hancock is a former economist and civil servant who had little to no background in public health or natural science before becoming health secretary of the United Kingdom. Prior to COVID-19, Hancock reportedly showed little interest in his role: “For him, it’s all about promoting himself and using it as a stepping stone to his next job,” said another NHS chief. “Tech is the only area in which he’s made a mark… But his belief that tech can solve many of the NHS’s difficulties had led to him being derided by people he needs to respect him.”[209]

Hancock has been especially keen on the adoption of technology from China, meeting with Kai-Fu Lee, CEO of Chinese venture capital firm Sinovation Ventures, in January 2018.[210] (In 2019, Kai-Fu Lee became part of the World Economic Forum’s AI Council along with Imperial College President Alice Gast).[211] In September 2018, Hancock led a “British business delegation talking healthtech in China”:[212] “I’m in China this week to look at collaborating with our Chinese counterparts to harness the power of tech & innovation in healthcare.”[213]

In April 2020, China’s National Health Commission reported that Hancock and his Chinese counterpart, Ma Xioawei, had spoken over the phone to discuss future collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis: “Hancock spoke highly of China’s commitment to fighting COVID-19 and China-UK cooperation during the pandemic, and said that the UK is willing to enhance exchanges and collaboration with China …”[214] Three weeks later, CGTN reported that Hancock and Ma held a digital meeting of high-level health officials from China and the UK in a bid to increase cooperation amid the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, including discussing “lockdown-lifting strategies:”

Hancock said he appreciated the cooperation so far between the two nations in their joint response to the epidemic, and expressed that the UK is willing to strengthen anti-epidemic cooperation with China and to use the epidemic prevention and control agreements as an opportunity to deepen bilateral health and global health cooperation… They held in-depth discussions on topics including lockdown-lifting strategies and reiterated their willingness to strengthen experience sharing and technical cooperation to jointly safeguard the people of the two countries.[215] (emphasis added)

During the COVID-19 crisis, Christian Drosten assumed the role of Germany’s most influential health official, though as a virologist he has little background in epidemiology, infectiology, or public health.[216] Drosten’s central role in creating the wildly-inaccurate COVID-19 PCR test has already been discussed. In a May 14 press conference, Drosten referred to: “this concept in the pandemic research of ‘The hammer and the dance,’” but this is not true — as discussed above, the term has no history, it was invented by Tomas Pueyo on March 19.

Daniel Andrews, Premier of Victoria, Australia, employs several advisors with ties to the CCP who have been involved in his strict pandemic policies. Danny Pearson, the MP who led Andrews’ Belt and Road negotiations, lauded China’s handling of the coronavirus.[217] Andrews’ long-time staffer, Nancy Yang, attended a course in propaganda at a high-level CCP academy and helped spread COVID-19 disinformation early in the COVID-19 crisis.[218] Both Yang and Andrews’ senior advisor on China, Marty Mei, are members of the Chinese Community Council of Australia, the foremost United Front organization in Victoria.[219] Two senior figures in organizations linked to the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign influence operation, Arthur Wu and Su Junxi, were chosen as COVID-19 “community ambassadors” in Andrews’ government.[220]

Andrews previously signed onto Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road initiative without consulting Prime Minister Scott Morrison, for which he was publicly rebuked.[221] Internal documents obtained under the freedom of information act show Andrews pitching for money and expertise from Chinese state-owned companies in his trip to China in October 2019, with a promise to “facilitate” their access to Victoria and “collaborate” on the state’s biggest projects. Victoria, he said, would become “China’s gateway to Australia.”[222]

In August 2020, the city of Melbourne in Victoria became the first Australian city to implement Stage 4 lockdown — the strictest restrictions, with curfews and stiff fines.[223]

11. Prominent Lockdown Supporters Have Proven Unusually Indifferent to the Devastating Consequences of Their Policies

In addition to their pro-China bias, lockdown proponents have proven strangely stubborn in their support of these policies, continuing to promote economically- and socially-destructive measures seemingly without concern for their terrifying real-world consequences; tragically, these consequences are all too real.

Data from the website has shown that over 60% of business closures during the COVID-19 crisis are now permanent, amounting to more than 97,000 businesses lost in the U.S.[224] Nearly half of black-owned small businesses have been wiped out.[225] Unemployment in the United States reached as high as 14.7% and highways jammed with thousands of vehicles awaiting their turn at food banks.[226] Nearly 5% of the population of the United Kingdom went hungry during the first three weeks of lockdown.[227]

A survey found that 22% of Canadians were experiencing high anxiety levels, a four-fold increase from before the COVID-19 crisis, while the number reporting symptoms of depression doubled to 13%.[228] More than 40 U.S. states have reported increases in opioid-related mortality.[229] And, according to the CDC, despite mass PCR testing and the enormous number of false positives, at least 100,947 excess deaths in 2020 were not linked to COVID-19 at all.[230]

Though at little risk from the virus itself, young people bore an outsized share of the burden of lockdown. More than seven in ten adults aged 18–23 said they experienced common symptoms of depression.[231] The CDC revealed that young adults aged 25–44 saw the largest increase in “excess” deaths from previous years, a stunning 26.5% jump,[232] despite accounting for fewer than 3% of deaths from COVID-19. This increase literally surpassed the increase in excess mortality of older Americans, who are at much higher risk of COVID-19 fatality. Since young people are at very low risk for COVID-19 fatality — 20–49-year-olds have a 99.98% chance of surviving the virus, per CDC data — this shocking increase in deaths is largely attributable to deaths of “despair,” in other words, deaths by lockdown.[233]

Suicides jumped to unprecedented levels around the world. “We’ve never seen numbers like this in such a short period of time,” said Walnut Creek’s Dr. Mike deBoisblanc. “I mean we’ve seen a year’s worth of suicide attempts in the last four weeks.”[234] “September of 2020 has been the highest month ever that we’ve seen suicidal patients admitted to our medical center,” said Dr. Kia Carter, medical director of Psychiatry at Cook Children’s Hospital.[235] In Japan, government statistics show suicide claimed more lives in October than Covid-19 has over the entire year to date.[236]

And, despite being at virtually no risk from COVID-19, as a result of lockdowns, children have suffered the most of all. Nearly one in four children living under COVID-19 lockdowns, social restrictions, and school closures are dealing with feelings of anxiety, with many at risk of lasting psychological distress.[237] In recent surveys of children and parents in the U.S., Germany, Finland, Spain and the U.K. by Save the Children, up to 65% of the children struggled with feelings of isolation.[238]

Children’s health and intellectual development has regressed. Some who were potty-trained before lockdowns have reverted to diapers, and others have forgotten basic numbers or how to use a knife and fork.[239] According to the University of Wisconsin, during the COVID-19 crisis American children over the age of ten have engaged in 50% less physical activity.[240] Achievement gaps have widened, and early literacy progress has declined.[241] Per CDC, the proportion of mental health–related emergency visits for children aged 5–11 and 12–17 years increased approximately 24% and 31%, respectively.[242] And, most horrifying of all, a study found a 1493% rise in the incidence of abusive head trauma among children during the first month of lockdown in the U.K.[243]

These are not statistics. They’re friends, neighbors, and citizens, whose lives have been needlessly destroyed by government policies. But while these statistics among the Nations may be horrifying, they pale in comparison to the suffering of untold millions in the developing world, cast into starvation and poverty as a result of our lockdowns. Autocracies grew more oppressive, and democracies took on autocratic characteristics.[244] In India, millions of stranded workers lost their livelihoods and marched in exodus to far-off villages.[245] In South Africa, food lines stretched for miles.[246] Quarantined migrants in Saudi Arabia were left to die. “The guards just throw the bodies out back as if it was trash.”[247]

The United Nations forewarned of a “famine of biblical proportions” with 265 million people “literally marching to the brink of starvation,”[248] and later estimated that the crisis had “pushed an additional 150 million children into multidimensional poverty — deprived of education, health, housing, nutrition, sanitation or water.”[249] All this for a virus that the WHO’s peer-reviewed data[250] now reveals to have an infection fatality rate of 0.23% — 0.05% in those under age 70 — and which the WHO estimates might have already infected one in ten people worldwide by October.[251]

According to the International Monetary Fund, the economy of just one G20 country grew during 2020: China.[252]

That lockdown supporters may not want to acknowledge these facts does not make them any less real. The suffering caused by these policies cannot be undone, but it can at least be prevented going forward, and justice can be obtained if these policies were imposed in bad faith.

Under the United Nations’ Covenant on Civil and Political rights, it is incumbent on any government imposing disease control measures to utilize the “least restrictive means” available to effectively achieve the public health goal.[253] With the examples of Sweden, Florida, South Dakota, Belarus, and others successfully deploying means far less restrictive than China’s lockdowns to manage COVID-19 — without incurring any excess mortality or results worse than lockdown areas — it is difficult to understand how any world leader can continue to impose these measures in good faith.


In the 20th century, the term totalitarian was born to describe certain regimes that used modern technology to control every aspect of citizens’ lives, binding them to the state by breaking all pre-existing social bonds. One such regime was the Soviet Union, and there is a growing expert consensus that China today is likewise totalitarian.[254] Totalitarian regimes utilize any and all means in the pathological monopolization of power. Though they deliver an exceptionally low quality of life to their citizens, totalitarian states are advanced political organisms, punching above their weight in geopolitics with their unparalleled ability to keep secrets and execute complex operations — the archetypal example being the clandestine rearmament of Germany in the 1930s. In the wilds of geopolitics, the lion underestimates the snake at its own peril, and with lockdowns, the CCP appears to have delivered the world a hefty dose of snake oil.

Both intelligence agencies and scientists may be forgiven for overlooking the CCP’s lockdown fraud. The scientific concepts involved are complex enough to elude defense officials,[255] while the geopolitical implications of China’s turn toward totalitarianism are certainly convoluted enough to have deceived scientists.

Throughout 2020, lockdown measures have been quite popular, but that popularity is deceptive. For the general public, the idea that anyone might accept some outside incentive to support such devastating policies while knowing them to be ineffective — needlessly bankrupting millions of families and depriving millions of children of education and food — is, quite simply, too dark. Thus, the public supports lockdowns because the alternative — that they might have been implemented without good cause — is a possibility too evil for most to contemplate. But those who know history know that others with superficially excellent credentials have done even worse for even less.

Furthermore, most of the public believes that if there were anything untoward about the science behind lockdowns, intelligence agencies would stop them. For obvious reasons, those who work at intelligence agencies do not have the luxury of such complacency. Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire “science” of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion, deliberately promulgated by the Chinese Communist Party and its collaborators to impoverish the nations who implemented it.

[1] E.g., Emily Badger and Quoctrung Bui, Cities That Went All In on Social Distancing in 1918 Emerged Stronger for It, N.Y. Times, Apr. 3, 2020,

[2] Civil Action №2:20-cv-677 (W.D. Pa. May. 28, 2020),

[3] Citing Howard Markel et al., Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918–1919 Influenza Pandemic, 298 JAMA 644, 647 (2007). The total duration of nonpharmaceutical interventions imposed by state and local mandate for Philadelphia and Pittsburgh were 51 and 53 days, respectively. Id. at 647, Table 1. This length was, generally, representative of the duration of interventions in most cities. Id. Seattle had the longest period of restrictions, nationwide, at 168 days from start to finish. See also Greg Ip, New Thinking on Covid Lockdowns: They’re Overly Blunt and Costly, WALL ST. J., Aug. 24, 2020 (“Prior to Covid-19, lockdowns weren’t part of the standard epidemic tool kit, which was primarily designed with flu in mind. During the 1918–1919 flu pandemic, some American cities closed schools, churches and theaters, banned large gatherings and funerals and restricted store hours. But none imposed stay-at-home orders or closed all nonessential businesses. No such measures were imposed during the 1957 flu pandemic, the next-deadliest one; even schools stayed open.”).

[4] Citing Noreen Quails et al., Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza, United States, 2017 (Sonja A. Rasmussen et al. eds., 2017).

[5] Thomas V. Inglesby, Jennifer B. Nuzzo, Tara O’toole, and D. A. Henderson, Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science Vol. 4 №4, 2006,

[6] Amy Qin, China’s Leader, Under Fire, Says He Led Coronavirus Fight Early On, N.Y. Times, Feb. 15, 2020,

[7] Choi Chi-yuk, Xi Jinping’s anti-graft drive has caught so many officials that Beijing’s elite prison is running out of cells, Feb. 14, 2018, South China Morning Post,

[8] Tom Phillips, ‘Dictator for life’: Xi Jinping’s power grab condemned as step towards tyranny, Feb. 26, 2018, The Guardian,

[9] Austin Ramzy and Chris Buckley, ‘Absolutely No Mercy’: Leaked Files Expose How China Organized Mass Detentions of Muslims, N.Y. Times, Nov. 16, 2019,

[10] Tanner Greer, China’s Plans to Win Control of the Global Order, Tablet Magazine, May 17, 2020,

[11] Sheena Chestnut Greitens and Julian Gewirtz, China’s Troubling Vision for the Future of Public Health, Foreign Affairs, Jul. 10, 2020,

[12] Amy Qin, China’s Leader, Under Fire, Says He Led Coronavirus Fight Early On, N.Y. Times, Feb. 15, 2020,

[13] Chris Buckley, China’s ‘Big Cannon’ Blasted Xi. Now He’s Been Jailed for 18 Years, N.Y. Times, Sep. 22, 2020,

[14] Josh Rudolph, Translation: Essay by Missing Property Tycoon Ren Zhiqiang, China Digital Times, Mar. 13, 2020,

[15] Sinéad Baker, China extended its Wuhan coronavirus quarantine to 2 more cities, cutting off 19 million people in an unprecedented effort to stop the outbreak, Business Insider, Jan. 23, 2020,

[16] E.g., Frances Eve, China’s reaction to the coronavirus outbreak violates human rights, The Guardian, Feb. 2, 2020,; Michael Levenson, Scale of China’s Wuhan Shutdown Is Believed to Be Without Precedent, N.Y. Times, Jan. 22, 2020,

[17] World Health Organization, Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Jan. 30, 2020,

[18] World Health Organization, WHO Director-General’s statement on IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Jan. 30, 2020,

[19] World Health Organization, Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Feb. 16–24, 2020,

[20] Tom Grundy, Video: Top WHO doctor Bruce Aylward ends video call after journalist asks about Taiwan’s status, Hong Kong Free Press, Mar. 29, 2020,; In April, Canada’s parliament summoned Aylward for questioning, but the WHO has forbidden him from testifying. Steven Chase, MPs vote to summon key WHO adviser after global body refuses to let him testify, The Globe and Mail, Apr. 30, 2020,; True North, WHO forbids Canadian official from testifying before health committee, Aug. 19, 2020,

[21] World Health Organization, Subject: Press Conference of WHO-China Joint Mission on COVID-19, Feb. 24, 2020,

[22] Daniel Harries, ‘Copy China’s response to COVID-19,’ WHO expert urges rest of the world, CGTN, Feb. 26, 2020,–OnNfwORI3u/index.html.

[23] World Health Organization, Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Feb. 16–24, 2020,

[24] World Health Organization, Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza, 2019,

[25] World Health Organization, Subject: Press Conference of WHO-China Joint Mission on COVID-19, Feb. 24, 2020,

[26] Stacey Rudin, What’s Behind The WHO’s Lockdown Mixed-Messaging, American Institute for Economic Research, Oct. 14, 2020,

[27] Noreen Quails et al., Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza, United States, 2017 (Sonja A. Rasmussen et al. eds., 2017),

[28] Neil M Ferguson et al., Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand, Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team, Mar. 16, 2020,

[29] Neil M Ferguson et al., Report 12: The Global Impact of COVID-19 and Strategies for Mitigation and Suppression, Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team, Mar. 16, 2020,

[30] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),

[31] National Health Service, COVID-19 Daily Deaths,

[32] Yanni Gu, A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19, Johns Hopkins News-Letter, Nov. 22, 2020,

[33] Joseph Friedman et al., Predictive performance of international COVID-19 mortality forecasting models, Nov. 19, 2020,

[34] Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, SPI-M-O: Long term winter scenarios preparatory working analysis, Oct. 31, 2020,

[35] National Health Service, COVID-19 Daily Deaths,

[36] Andrew Scheuber, Chinese President sees UK-China academic partnerships at Imperial, Imperial College London, Oct. 21, 2015,

[37] Wikipedia, 2015 Xi Jinping visit to the United Kingdom,

[38] Andrew Scheuber, Chinese President sees UK-China academic partnerships at Imperial, Imperial College London, Oct. 21, 2015,

[39] Peter S. Goodman, In Era of Trump, China’s President Champions Economic Globalization, N.Y. Times, Jan. 17, 2017,; see also Aya Velázquez, China Und Der Great Reset, Demokratischer Widerstand, Nov. 27, 2020,

[40] David Lee, World Economic Forum Establishes “A.I. Council” Co-chaired by Chinese AI Expert Kai-Fu Lee, Pandaily, Jan. 24, 2019,; Imperial College London, China and Imperial,

[41] Neil M Ferguson and Steven Riley et al., Report 11 — Evidence of initial success for China exiting COVID-19 social distancing policy after achieving containment, Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team, Mar. 24, 2020,

[42] Sonam Sheth and Isaac Scher, The US intelligence community has reportedly concluded that China intentionally misrepresented its coronavirus numbers, Business Insider, Apr. 1, 2020,

[43] Tom Whipple, Professor Neil Ferguson: People don’t agree with lockdown and try to undermine the scientists, The Times of London, Dec. 25, 2020,

[44] World Health Organization, Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected, Mar. 13, 2020,

[45] Philippe Rola et al., Rethinking the early intubation paradigm of COVID-19: time to change gears?, Clin Exp Emerg Med Vol. 7(2), Jun. 10, 2020,

[46] Fujun Peng et al., Management and Treatment of COVID-19: The Chinese Experience, Can J Cardiol Vol. 36(6), Apt. 17, 2020,

[47] Melanie Evans, Hospitals Retreat From Early Covid Treatment and Return to Basics, Wall Street Journal, Dec. 20, 2020,

[48] Jordan Schachtel, ‘First Choice’: How China and the WHO created mass ventilator hysteria, Sep. 30, 2020,

[49] Cameron Kyle-Sidell, From NYC ICU: Does Covid-19 Really Cause ARDS??!!, YouTube, Mar. 31, 2020,

[50] Silvia Aloisi et al., Special Report: As virus advances, doctors rethink rush to ventilate, Reuters, Apr. 23, 2020,

[51] Sharon Begley, With ventilators running out, doctors say the machines are overused for Covid-19, Stat, Apr. 8, 2020,

[52] Safiya Richardson, MD, MPH, et al., Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area, JAMA 2020 323(20), Apr. 22, 2020,

[53] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, World Health Organization, Jan. 17, 2020,

[54] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, Eurosurveillance European Communicable Disease Bulletin Vol. 25(3), Jan. 23, 2020,

[55] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, World Health Organization, Jan. 13, 2020,

[56] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, Eurosurveillance European Communicable Disease Bulletin Vol. 25(3), Jan. 23, 2020,

[57] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, World Health Organization, Jan. 17, 2020,

[58] Eurosurveillane, Editorial Board,

[59] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, Eurosurveillance European Communicable Disease Bulletin Vol. 25(3), Jan. 23, 2020,

[60] World Health Organization, Archived: WHO Timeline — COVID-19, Apr. 27, 2020,—covid-19.

[61] @waukema, Twitter, Nov. 30, 2020,

[62] Eurosurveillane, Evaluation and review process,

[63] Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, Eurosurveillance European Communicable Disease Bulletin Vol. 25(3), Jan. 23, 2020,

[64] Pieter Borger et al., External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results, Nov. 27, 2020,

[65] Citing New China virus: Warning against cover-up as number of cases jumps, BBC, Jan. 21, 2020,

[66] Citing Google Analytics — COVID19-deaths worldwide,

[67] Citing Victor Corman and Christian Drosten et al., Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR, Eurosurveillance European Communicable Disease Bulletin Vol. 25(3), Jan. 23, 2020,

[68] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Viral Diseases, CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Feb. 4, 2020,

[69] Sibyle Etievant et al., Performance Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 PCR Assays Developed by WHO Referral Laboratories. J Clin Med Vol. 9(6), Jun. 16, 2020,

[70] World Health Organization, Summary table of available protocols in this document,

[71] World Health Organization, Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in suspected human cases, Mar. 19, 2020,

[72] Daniel Payne, In little noticed July interview, Fauci warned that widely used COVID tests may pick up ‘dead’ virus, Just the News, Dec. 10, 2020,

[73] World Health Organization, Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in suspected human cases, Mar. 19, 2020,

[74] Qun Li et al., Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia, N Engl J Med Vol. 382(13), Jan. 29, 2020,; Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China, N Engl J Med Vol. 382, Feb. 28, 2020,; Wei Zhang et al., Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes, Emerg Microbes Infect Vol. 9(1), Feb. 17, 2020,

[75] Qun Li et al., Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia, N Engl J Med Vol. 382(13), Jan. 29, 2020,

[76] Apoorva Mandavilli, Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be., N.Y. Times, Aug. 29, 2020,

[77] Id.

[78] Natasha Donn, Judges in Portugal highlight “more than debatable” reliability of Covid tests, Portugal Resident, Nov. 20, 2020,

[79] Court of Appeal of Lisbon, judgment of 11–11–2020 in Proceedings №1783/20.7T8PDL.L1–3,

[80] Id.

[81] Id.

[82] World Health Organization, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions, Jul. 9, 2020,

[83] World Health Organization, Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Feb. 16–24, 2020,

[84] Pien Huang, What We Know About The Silent Spreaders Of COVID-19, NPR, Apr. 13, 2020,

[85] Noreen Quails et al., Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza, United States, 2017 (Sonja A. Rasmussen et al. eds., 2017),

[86] World Health Organization, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions, Jul. 9, 2020,; Lei Luo et al., Modes of contact and risk of transmission in COVID-19 among close contacts, Mar. 26, 2020,; Lei Huang et al., Rapid asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 during the incubation period demonstrating strong infectivity in a cluster of youngsters aged 16–23 years outside Wuhan and characteristics of young patients with COVID-19: A prospective contact-tracing study, J Infect Vol. 80(6), Apr. 10, 2020,; Quan-Xin Long et al., Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, Nat Med Vol. 26, Jun. 18, 2020,

[87] Hao-Yuan Cheng, MD, MSc et al., Contact Tracing Assessment of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics in Taiwan and Risk at Different Exposure Periods Before and After Symptom Onset, JAMA Intern Med Vol. 180(9), May 1, 2020,; Shin Young Park et al., Coronavirus Disease Outbreak in Call Center, South Korea, Emerg Infect Dis Vol. 26(8), Apr. 23, 2020,

[88] Mercedes Yanes-Lane et al., Proportion of asymptomatic infection among COVID-19 positive persons and their transmission potential: A systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, Nov. 3, 2020,

[89] Enrico Lavezzo et al., Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo’, Nature Vol. 584, Jun. 30, 2020,

[90] Liling Chaw et al., Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Different Settings, Brunei, Emerg Infect Dis Vol. 26(11), Oct. 9, 2020,

[91] Justin Wong et al., Asymptomatic transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 and implications for mass gatherings, Influenza Other Respir Viruses Vol. 14(5), May 30, 2020,

[92] Christian Drosten, M.D. et al., Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany, N Engl J Med Vol. 382, Jan. 30, 2020,

[93] Kai Kupferschmidt, Study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed, Science, Feb. 3, 2020,

[94] Brendan McFadden, Coronavirus: Infected people seen ‘dead in streets’ in Chinese city dubbed ‘zombieland’, Daily Mirror, Jan. 24, 2020,; Simon Osborne, ‘Like Walking Dead’ Coronavirus hell as corpses litter hospitals while people drop dead, Daily Express, Jan. 24, 2020,; Li Yuan, A Generation Grows Up in China Without Google, Facebook or Twitter, N.Y. Times, Aug. 6, 2018,

[95] Jane Lytvynenko, Chinese State Media Spread A False Image Of A Hospital For Coronavirus Patients In Wuhan, BuzzFeed News, Jan. 27, 2020,

[96] Raymond Zhong et al., Behind China’s Twitter Campaign, a Murky Supporting Chorus, N.Y. Times, Jun. 8, 2020,

[97] Laurence Dodds, China floods Facebook with undeclared coronavirus propaganda ads blaming Trump, Daily Telegraph, Apr. 5, 2020,

[98] World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, Jun. 9, 2020,; Wikipedia, Herd Immunity,

[99] @HuXijin_GT, Twitter, Mar. 14, 2020,

[100] David Hutt, Sweden-China ties grow ever icier over Hong Kong and coronavirus, Nikkei Asia, Jun. 11, 2020,

[101] Leng Shumei, Sweden’s herd immunity strategy coldblooded, indifferent: netizens, Global Times, Apr. 25, 2020,

[102] World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Herd immunity, lockdowns and COVID-19, Oct. 15, 2020,; contra World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, Jun. 9, 2020,

[103] @SpokespersonCHN, Twitter, Apr. 5, 2020,

[104] Raymond Zhong et al., Behind China’s Twitter Campaign, a Murky Supporting Chorus, N.Y. Times, Jun. 8, 2020,

[105] @Mr_Zaheed, Twitter, Mar. 16, 2020,

[106] @PolySarkcess, Twitter, Mar. 18, 2020,

[107] @SipheleleQalaba, Twitter, Mar. 22, 2020,

[108] @jaysibalatani, Twitter, Mar. 15, 2020,

[109] @King_Mindu, Twitter, Mar. 14, 2020,

[110] @LDNSOM, Twitter, Mar. 15, 2020,

[111] @juanitoalimagna, Twitter, Mar. 15, 2020,

[112] @chez_art, Twitter, Mar. 15, 2020,

[113] @dedeteodoro, Twitter, Mar. 14, 2020,

[114] @Loukasz_, Twitter, Mar. 19, 2020,

[115] @yycjfl_yycguy, Twitter, Mar. 13, 2020,

[116] @cxrdelias, Twitter, Mar. 16, 2020,

[117] @DheerajShah_, Twitter, Mar. 15, 2020,

[118] @dirkregido, Twitter, Mar. 13, 2020,

[119] @DeanTweets_, Twitter, Mar. 25, 2020,

[120] @MoToTheMO94, Twitter, Mar. 16, 2020,

[121] Michael P. Senger, China’s Global Lockdown Propaganda Campaign, Tablet, Sep. 15, 2020,

[122] Huffington Post, “Ci sono ancora troppe persone per strada e comportamenti da migliorare”, Mar. 14, 2020,

[123] James Patterson, Italy Coronavirus Lockdown ‘Not Enough,’ Says China, Healthcare Staff Stop Counting Bodies, Int’l Bus. Times, Mar. 20, 2020,

[124] Zachary Evans, Chinese Company Suspected of Spying on U.S. Citizens Donates Police Drones to 22 States, Nat’l Review, Apr. 20, 2020,

[125] Bureau of Industry and Security, Addition of Entities to the Entity List, Revision of Entry on the Entity List, and Removal of Entities from the Entity List, U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, 15 CFR 744 Docket №201215–0347, Dec. 22, 2020,

[126] Christopher Wray, The Threat Posed by the Chinese Government and the Chinese Communist Party to the Economic and National Security of the United States, FBI, Jul. 7, 2020,

[127] Chrissy Clark, A Rundown Of Major U.S. Corporate Media’s Business Ties To China, The Federalist, May 4, 2020,

[128] Donald G. McNeil Jr., To Take On the Coronavirus, Go Medieval on It, N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 2020,; Gerry Shih, Locked down in Beijing, I watched China beat back the coronavirus, Wash. Post, Mar. 16, 2020,; David Brennan, Should Trump Copy China’s Aggressive Coronavirus Strategy?, Newsweek, Mar. 12, 2020,

[129] Peter Hessler, How China Controlled the Coronavirus, New Yorker, Aug. 10, 2020,

[130] Keith Naughton, Coronavirus: It’s time to get real about the misleading data, The Hill, Apr. 1, 2020,

[131] Kaylee McGhee White, Don’t trust China’s coronavirus numbers, Wash. Exam’r, Mar. 30, 2020,; Michael Meyer-Resende, How reliable is WHO coronavirus data?, EU Observer, Mar. 19, 2020,

[132] Stephanie Kirchgaessner et al., China clamping down on coronavirus research, deleted pages suggest, The Guardian, Apr. 11, 2020,

[133] Sonam Sheth and Isaac Scher, The US intelligence community has reportedly concluded that China intentionally misrepresented its coronavirus numbers, Business Insider, Apr. 1, 2020,

[134] Global Times, China shows world the right way for pandemic response: The Lancet chief editor, May 2, 2020,

[135] @richardhorton1, Twitter, Jul. 7, 2020,

[136] Richard Horton, This wave of anti-China feeling masks the west’s own Covid-19 failures, The Guardian, Aug. 3, 2020,

[137] Talha Burki, China’s successful control of COVID-19, The Lancet Vol. 20(11), Oct. 8, 2020,

[138] @chenweihua, Twitter, Oct. 16, 2020,

[139] Shen Libing et al., The Early Cryptic Transmission and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in Human Hosts, SSRN, Nov. 16, 2020,

[140] Charlie Moore, China claims coronavirus may have started in AUSTRALIA and travelled to Wuhan’s wet market via frozen steak exports — and attacks US alliance with insulting new cartoon, Daily Mail Australia, Dec. 6. 2020,

[141] William A. Haseltine, Herd immunity will not defeat COVID-19, China Daily, Oct. 12, 2020,; Worldometer, COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic,

[142] @WmHaseltine, Twitter, Mar. 25, 2020,

[143] @WmHaseltine, Twitter, Mar. 25, 2020,

[144] @WmHaseltine, Twitter, May 20, 2020,

[145] @WmHaseltine, Twitter, Jun. 4, 2020,

[146] @WmHaseltine, Twitter, Sep. 15, 2020,

[147] Xinhua, China, US eye cooperation in fighting global epidemic diseases, Global Times, May 13, 2015,

[148] Helen Branswell, WHO elects Ethiopia’s Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus as its new director general, Stat, May 23, 2017,

[149] Donald G. McNeil Jr., Candidate to Lead the W.H.O. Accused of Covering Up Epidemics, N.Y. Times, May 13, 2017,

[150] Jonathan Ames, Tedros Adhanom: WHO chief may face genocide charges, The Times of London, Dec. 14, 2020,; Frank Report, The Ethiopian Terrorist in Charge of the World Health Organization — Dr. Tedros Adhanom, Apr. 14, 2020,

[151] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Nov. 7, 2018,; @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Jun. 21, 2019,

[152] Dr. Tom Frieden, Former CDC director: A coronavirus pandemic is inevitable. What now?, CNN, Feb. 25, 2020,

[153] @cgtnamerica, Twitter, Apr. 8, 2020,

[154] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Mar. 17, 2020,

[155] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Apr. 1, 2020,; @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Apr. 1, 2020,; @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Apr. 1, 2020,

[156] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Aug. 14, 2020,

[157] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Aug. 15, 2020,

[158] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Aug. 18, 2020,

[159] @DrTomFrieden, Twitter, Aug. 18, 2020,

[160] Jeffrey Mervis, Fifty-four scientists have lost their jobs as a result of NIH probe into foreign ties, Science, Jun. 12, 2020,

[161] Office of Public Affairs, Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases, U.S. Dep’t of Justice Press Release №20–99, Jan. 28, 2020,

[162] Sam Cooper, Chinese vaccine company executives worked in program now targeted by Western intelligence agencies, Global News, Dec. 2, 2020,

[163] Guillermo S. Hava, The Other Chan: Donation Sanitization at the School of Public Health, The Harvard Crimson, Oct. 19, 2020,

[164] @DrEricDing, Twitter, Jan. 25, 2020,

[165] Tom Bartlett, This Harvard Epidemiologist Is Very Popular on Twitter. But Does He Know What He’s Talking About?, The Chronicle of Higher Educ., Apr. 17, 2020,

[166] Global Shapers Community, Taipei Hub,

[167] World Economic Forum, Global Shapers Community Annual Report 2019–2020,

[168] @mlipsitch, Twitter, Mar. 19, 2020,

[169] @angie_rasmussen, Twitter, Apr. 14, 2020,

[170] @DrEricDing, Twitter, Oct. 20, 2020,

[171] Tomas Pueyo, Coronavirus: Why You Must Act Now, Medium, Mar. 10, 2020,

[172] @sapinker, Twitter, Mar. 11, 2020,

[173] @tomaspueyo, Twitter, Mar. 25, 2020,

[174] World Health Organization, Archived: WHO Timeline — COVID-19, Apr. 27, 2020,—covid-19.

[175] Tomas Pueyo, Coronavirus: The Hammer and the Dance, Medium, Mar. 19, 2020,

[176] Parliamentwatch, Das interne Strategiepapier des Innenministeriums zur Corona-Pandemie, Apr. 7, 2020,

[177] Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, Wie wir COVID-19 unter Kontrolle bekommen, Strategiepapier des Bundesinnenministeriums, FragDenStaat, Mar. 22, 2020,

[178] Google Trends, Hammer and Dance,; Google Trends, Hammer and the Dance,

[179] Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, Brief: Informationsfreiheitsgesetz Strategiepapier des Bundesinnenministeriums “Wie wir COVID-19 unter Kontrolle bekommen”, Jun. 9, 2020,

[180] Université de Lausanne Faculté des lettres Section d’allemand, Kölbl Otto,

[181] Otto Kölbl, Hong Kong — An extreme example of parasitic development,

[182] Otto Kölbl, Have Tibetans benefited from recent economic development?,

[183] Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, Brief: Informationsfreiheitsgesetz Strategiepapier des Bundesinnenministeriums “Wie wir COVID-19 unter Kontrolle bekommen”, Jun. 9, 2020,

[184] Munich Center for Technology in Society Technical University of Munich, Dr. Maximilian Mayer,

[185] Id.

[186] Universität Bonn Institut für Politische Wissenschaft und Soziologie, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Maximilian Mayer,

[187] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Feb. 2, 2020,

[188] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Feb. 28, 2020,

[189] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Feb. 28, 2020,

[190] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Apr. 26, 2020,

[191] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Jul. 18, 2020,

[192] @SophieHRW, Twitter, Jul. 18, 2020,

[193] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Mar. 8, 2020,

[194] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Mar. 14, 2020,

[195] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Mar. 29, 2020,

[196] @yaneerbaryam, Twitter, Aug. 3, 2020,

[197] Joan Bryden, Nothing prepared Patty Hajdu for this, Canada’s Nat’l Observer, Apr. 6 2020,

[198] @PattyHajdu, Twitter, Jan. 20, 2014,

[199] Christy Somos, China praises Canada, slams U.S. over coronavirus response, CTV News, Feb. 3, 2020,

[200] Graeme Wood, Questioning WHO and China virus data feeds conspiracy theories: Health Minister, Richmond News, Apr. 2, 2020,

[201] Id.

[202] Robyn Urback, Canadians have been gaslit on China, The Globe and Mail, Apr. 30, 2020,

[203] True North, Hajdu stands by praise for Chinese government and wanting to keep borders open, Apr. 30, 2020,

[204] CGTN, Canada’s health minister praises China’s handling of COVID-19, Sep. 16, 2020,–TPrDfplKJq/index.html.

[205] @chenweihua, Twitter, Apr. 3, 2020,

[206] Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on September 18, 2020, Sep. 18, 2020,

[207] Spencer Fernando, Propaganda Patty Defends Communist China Yet Again, Sept. 13, 2020,

[208] True North, Hajdu slanders journalist as “dangerous” and “fake news”, Nov. 26, 2020,

[209] Denis Campbell, Who’s Matt Hancock? The health secretary’s only legacy will be how quickly he’s forgotten, The Guardian, Jul. 24, 2019,

[210] @MattHancock, Twitter, Jan. 19, 2018,

[211] David Lee, World Economic Forum Establishes “A.I. Council” Co-chaired by Chinese AI Expert Kai-Fu Lee, Pandaily, Jan. 24, 2019,

[212] @MattHancock, Twitter, Sep. 19, 2018,

[213] @MattHancock, Twitter, Sep. 17, 2018,

[214] National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, NHC minister speaks on phone with UK health secretary, Apr. 23, 2020,

[215] CGTN, Public health experts from China and UK move to develop greater cooperation, May 16, 2020,

[216] Tim Loh, Germany Has Its Own Dr. Fauci — and Actually Follows His Advice, Bloomberg Businessweek, Sept. 28, 2020,

[217] Damon Johnston, Daniel Andrews’s BRI broker praises China on virus, The Australian, Jun. 12, 2020,

[218] Rachel Baxendale, Daniel Andrews staffer Nancy Yang did Chinese Communist propaganda course, The Australian, Jun. 29, 2020,; Alison Bevege, Labor staffer with Chinese Communist Party links pushes bizarre conspiracy theory coronavirus was created by the U.S. and spread around the globe by its army, Daily Mail Australia, Jun. 1, 2020,

[219] Advance Australia, How CCP Influence Runs Deep in Oz, Jun. 12, 2020,

[220] Tom Minear, ‘Community ambassadors’ linked to Chinese Community Party, Herald Sun, Dec. 1, 2020,

[221] ABC News, Prime Minister Scott Morrison, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews clash over China deal, Nov. 6, 2018,

[222] Richard Baker, ‘China’s gateway’: Daniel Andrews’ Belt and Road pitch to Beijing, The Age, Oct. 3, 2020,

[223] Kaeli Conforti, Melbourne Begins Strict Stage 4 Lockdown This Week After Another Covid-19 Spike, Forbes, Aug. 3, 2020,; Victoria Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria’s restriction levels,

[224] Anjali Sundaram, Yelp data shows 60% of business closures due to the coronavirus pandemic are now permanent, CNBC, Sep. 16 2020,

[225] Pedro Nicolaci da Costa, The Covid-19 Crisis Has Wiped Out Nearly Half Of Black Small Businesses, Forbes, Aug. 10, 2020,

[226] Jack Healy, It’s ‘People, People, People’ as Lines Stretch Across America, N.Y. Times, Apr. 12, 2020,

[227] Bethan Staton and Judith Evans, Three million go hungry in UK because of lockdown, Fin. Times, Apr. 10, 2020,

[228] Morganne Campbell, Canadians reporting higher levels of anxiety, depression amid the pandemic, Global News, Oct. 10, 2020,

[229] American Medical Association, Issue brief: Reports of increases in opioid- and other drug-related overdose and other concerns during COVID pandemic, Dec. 9, 2020,

[230] Lauren M. Rossen, PhD et al., Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19, by Age and Race and Ethnicity — United States, January 26–October 3, 2020, U.S. CDC MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Vol. 69(42), Oct. 23, 2020,

[231] Cory Stieg, More than 7 in 10 Gen-Zers report symptoms of depression during pandemic, survey finds, CNBC, Oct. 21 2020,

[232] Amanda Prestigiacomo, New CDC Numbers Show Lockdown’s Deadly Toll On Young People, The Daily Wire, Oct. 22, 2020,

[233] Id.

[234] Amy Hollyfield, Suicides on the rise amid stay-at-home order, Bay Area medical professionals say, ABC 7 News, May 21, 2020,

[235] SBG San Antonio, HOSPITAL: 37 children attempted suicide in September, highest number in five years, CBS Austin, Oct. 27th 2020,

[236] Selina Wang et al., In Japan, more people died from suicide last month than from Covid in all of 2020. And women have been impacted most, CNN, Nov. 30, 2020,

[237] Save the Children, ‘Children at risk of lasting psychological distress from coronavirus lockdown’: Save the Children, UN OCHA Reliefweb, May 8, 2020,

[238] Save the Children, ‘Children at Risk of Lasting Psychological Distress from Coronavirus Lockdown’: Save the Children, May 8, 2020,

[239] Sally Weale, Children regressing and struggling mentally in lockdown, says Ofsted, The Guardian, Nov. 9, 2020,

[240] The Economist, Lockdowns could have long-term effects on children’s health, Jul. 19 2020,

[241] Perry Stein, In D.C., achievement gap widens, early literacy progress declines during pandemic, data show, Wash. Post, Oct. 30, 2020,

[242] Rebecca T. Leeb, PhD et al., Mental Health–Related Emergency Department Visits Among Children Aged <18 Years During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, January 1–October 17, 2020, U.S. CDC MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Vol. 69(45), Nov. 13, 2020,

[243] Jai Sidpra et al., Rise in the incidence of abusive head trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Jul. 2, 2020,

[244] The Economist, The pandemic has eroded democracy and respect for human rights, Oct. 17, 2020,

[245] Rajesh Roy, India Tries to Stem Migrant Worker Exodus Amid Coronavirus Lockdown, Wall St. J., Mar. 29, 2020,

[246] Reuters, Miles-long lines for food in South Africa, YouTube, Apr. 30, 2020,

[247] Will Brown, Investigation: African migrants ‘left to die’ in Saudi Arabia’s hellish Covid detention centres, Daily Telegraph, Aug. 30, 2020,

[248] Fiona Harvey, Coronavirus pandemic ‘will cause famine of biblical proportions’, Guardian, Apr. 21, 2020,

[249] UNICEF, COVID pushes millions more children deeper into poverty, new study finds, UN News, Sep. 17, 2020,

[250] John P A Ioannidis, Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Oct. 14, 2020,

[251] CNBC, WHO says 10% of global population may have been infected with virus, Oct. 5, 2020,

[252] International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, October 2020: A Long and Difficult Ascent, Oct. 2020,

[253] International Commission of Jurists, Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Jul 1, 1984,

[254] Francis Fukuyama, What Kind of Regime Does China Have?, The American Interest, May 18, 2020,; Robert C. O’Brien, The Chinese Communist Party’s Ideology and Global Ambitions, White House National Security Council, Jun. 26, 2020,

[255] Adam Schiff, The U.S. Intelligence Community Is Not Prepared for the China Threat, Foreign Affairs, Sep. 30, 2020,

This letter is to be construed only as a recommendation that the above matters be investigated by law-enforcement authorities as a matter of national security. This is not a formal criminal complaint, nor are these facts necessarily indicative that any crime may have been committed by any individual named herein, a determination that can be made only by appropriate legal authorities.

Respectfully submitted this 10th day of January, 2021, by:

Michael P. Senger, Attorney, @michaelpsenger;
Stacey A. Rudin, Attorney,
Dr. Clare Craig FRCPath, Consultant Diagnostic Pathologist,
Robert Spalding, retired U.S. Air Force Brigadier General,
Randy Hillier, MPP Lanark, Frontenac & Kingston,
Francis Hoar, Barrister at Law,
Sanjeev Sabhlok, PhD, former Commissioner in an Indian State Government,
Brian O’Shea, COO, Centurion Intelligence Partners,
Maajid Nawaz, Activist, Author & Broadcaster,
Simon Dolan, Business Leader & Entrepreneur,

Respectfully submitted this 10th day of January, 2021

Published in: on January 24, 2021 at 1:33 am  Comments Off on Request for expedited federal investigation into Lockdown Fraud  
Tags: ,

WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce Massive COVID False Positives

Update January 30, 2021 Adding VAERS

In the U.S., which relies almost exclusively on passive surveillance, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Check it out you might be shocked, at what you find.

Right on Cue for Biden, WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce Massive COVID False Positives

HAFHAFJanuary 21, 2021

by Tyler Durden

Were the ‘conspiracy theorists‘ just proven right about the “fake rescue plan” for COVID?

Did the ‘science-deniers’ just get confirmation that it was political after all? The short answer to both of these questions regarding the COVID-19 ‘casedemic’ and the fallacy of asymptomatic PCR testing is YES and YES!

Casedemic Not Pandemic

We have detailed the controversy surrounding America’s COVID “casedemic” and the misleading results of the PCR test and its amplification procedure in great detail over the past few months.

As a reminder, “cycle thresholds” (Ct) are the level at which widely used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can detect a sample of the COVID-19 virus.

The higher the number of cycles, the lower the amount of viral load in the sample; the lower the cycles, the more prevalent the virus was in the original sample.

Numerous epidemiological experts have argued that cycle thresholds are an important metric by which patients, the public, and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be. However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country are failing to collect that data.

In fact, as far back as October, we brought the world’s attention to the COVID-19 “casedemic” and the disturbing reality of high-cycle threshold PCR tests being worse than useless as indicators of COVID-19 “sickness”. PJMedia’s Stacey Lennox said at the time:

Biden will issue national standards, like the plexiglass barriers in restaurants he spoke about during the debate, and pressure governors to implement mask mandates using the federal government’s financial leverage.

Some hack at the CDC or FDA will issue new guidance lowering the Ct the labs use, and cases will magically start to fall.

In reality, the change will only eliminate false positives, but most Americans won’t know that.

Good old Uncle Joe will be the hero, even though it is Deep-State actors in the health bureaucracies who won’t solve a problem with testing they have been aware of for months. TDS is a heck of a drug.”

And now, as Lennox explains in detail below, we have been proved 100% correct as less than one hour after President Biden’s inauguration, the WHO proved us right.

In August of last year, The New York Times published an article stating that as many as 90% of COVID-19 tests in three states were not indicative of active illness. In other words, they were picking up viral debris incapable of causing infection or being transmitted because the cycle threshold (Ct) of the PCR testing amplified the sample too many times.

Labs in the United States were using a Ct of 37-40. Epidemiologists interviewed at the time said a Ct of around 30 was probably more appropriate. This means the CDC’s COVID-19 test standards for the PCR test would pick up an excessive number of false positives. 

The Times report noted the CDC’s own data suggested the PCR did not detect live virus over a Ct of 33. The reporter also noted that clinicians were not receiving the Ct value as part of the test results.

Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. 

On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.

Shortly before the New York Times article was published, the CDC revised its COVID-19 test recommendations, saying that only syptomatic patients should be tested. The media went insane, and Dr. Fauci went all over television saying he was not part of the decision to change the testing standards:

“I am concerned about the interpretation of these recommendations and worried it will give people the incorrect assumption that asymptomatic spread is not of great concern. In fact it is.”

So, of course, the Mendacious Midget™ had spoken, and the guidelines went back to testing everyone, all the time, with an oversensitive test.

The idea that asymptomatic spread was a concern as of August was just one of many lies Dr. Fauci told. At the beginning of the pandemic in late January, he said:

The one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.

There is not a single study or meta-analysis that differs from Fauci’s original assessment.

Today, within an hour of Joe Biden being inaugurated and signing an executive order mandating masks on all federal property, the WHO sent out a notice to lab professionals using the PCR test. It said:

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1).

The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load.

Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

literally one hour after Biden takes the oath, the WHO admits that PCR testing at high amplification rates alters the predictive value of the tests and results in a huge number of false positives

— Andy Swan (@AndySwan) January 20, 2021

This translates to “in the absence of symptoms, a high Ct value means you are highly unlikely to become ill or get anyone else sick in the absence of very recent exposure to an infected person.”

Dr. Fauci knew this in July when he said that tests with a Ct above 35 were likely picking up viral debris or dead virus.

Even at a Ct of 35, the incidence of virus samples that could replicate is very low, according to Jaafar et al.

The only state I know that requires reporting the Ct with every test is Florida, which started this policy in December.

The WHO went on, stating:

“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”

In short, a positive PCR test in the absence of symptoms means nothing at a Ct of higher than 30, according to the experts interviewed by the New York Times and according to Jaafar et al. Yet positive tests is the number CNN loves flashing on the screen.

Rt Pcr Test Is Useless For Detecting Viruses

If the percentage found by the Times in August holds, there have been approximately 2.43 million actual cases to date, not 24.3 million.

There is also no way to calculate the deaths from COVID-19 rather than deaths with some dead viral debris in the nostrils.

What I have referred to as the “casedemic” since September will be magically solved just in time for Joe Biden to look like a hero. For doing absolutely nothing.

Do not tell me there is not a politicized deep state in our health agencies. Do not ever tell me I need to listen to Dr. Anthony Fauci again. And every business owner who has been ruined because of lockdowns due to a high number of “cases” should be livid. Any parent whose child has lost a year of school should be furious.

None of this was for your health. It was to get rid of Orange Man Bad.

now they will drop the cycle rates and you can watch the curve go negative… like magic… because the new magic man isn’t the bad man and the masks he ordered worked!!!!!

— Andy Swan (@AndySwan) January 20, 2021

As an aside, this also clearly explains the disappearance of the “flu” during this season as the plethora of high Ct PCR Tests supposedly pointing to a surge in COVID are nothing of the sort.

Covid Cases

As Stephen Lendman noted previously, claiming “lockdowns stopped flu in its tracks, (outbreaks) plummet(ting) by 98% in the United States” ignored that what’s called COVID is merely seasonal influenza combined with false positives (extremely high Ct) from PCR-Tests.

And for that reason, the great 2020 disappearing flu passes largely under the mass media’s radar.

Media proliferated mass deception and the power of repetition get most people to believe and having successfully “killed the flu”, they will now do the same with COVID… and, if allowed by our betters, we will all return to the new normal they desire. Source

WHO knew all along the PCR tests were worthless. I would say they have known that for years in fact. Jail time for the perpetrators of this scam is in order. This time even those in drug companies, that make vaccines should see some jail time as well. They worship a good pandemic.

PCR Covid 19 Tests are Worthless

Now what about all those injured from the Vaccines, no one needs and there are many who have been harmed.

They still have not Isolated the Covid Virus

Evidence Covid Virus does not exist

Questions you Ask all Governments before getting the Covid Vaccine

The many Dangers of Lockdowns Number of deaths per year in Canada and the US. Less died in 2020 then previous years.

Published in: on January 23, 2021 at 12:12 am  Comments (4)