Experimenting on Babies as young as 6 months old-Wake up People

Anything in italics are Quotes from the News reports.

COVID-19 vaccine trials to include participants as young as 6 months

“In about 30 days, we’re going to start another trial that is six months to 17 years old, but that’s about 30 days away,” said Elizabeth Hoff, the executive director at DM Clinical.

So they want to use babies as lab rats, just to see how things go. Anyone who puts their child into one of those trials, does not deserve to be a parent.

The news tries to make it sound so warm and fuzzy, it is nauseating.

Kids need this vaccine for what purpose exactly. It is not to protect them or anyone else for that matter.  They could die or be maimed for life as well. Kids are not even affected by so called covid anyway. For everyone there is is over a 99% recovery rate, even if you think the virus is real.

Of course it has not been isolated. As noted by many. Even China has not isolated the so called virus. The PCR tests are useless. They were never meant to test for a virus. Again noted by many. Even Kary Mullis, who invented the bloody test. There are lawsuits over that as well. Some settled some pending.

There are 100, 12 to 17-year-olds participating in the Moderna adolescent trial through Houston Fights COVID. There are more trials coming, and the groups are now seeking participants as young as six months old.

Well those kids do not need the vaccines either.

https://abc13.com/houston-covid-vaccine-trials-covid-19-for-kids-now-part-of-some/10331444/

COVID-19: Oxford vaccine to be tested on children as young as six in world-first trial

The trial conducted at Oxford University and its partner sites is the first to assess the jab’s efficacy in children aged 6-17.

13 February 2021 17:52, UK Children as young as six will be given the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine as part of a new clinical trial to test its efficacy in youngsters.

Researchers will use 300 volunteers to assess whether the coronavirus vaccine will produce a strong immune response in children aged between six and 17.

Professor Andrew Pollard, chief investigator on the Oxford vaccine trial, said: “While most children are relatively unaffected by coronavirus and are unlikely to become unwell with the infection, it is important to establish the safety and immune response to the vaccine in children and young people as some children may benefit from vaccination.

So what insanity makes them think, giving children or teens of any age, these horrid vaccines, is a good idea. With all those that have died already from the vaccines there is absolutely no benefit to giving children any of the vaccines. So call covid really does no harm to children. These people are  completely insane. Leave the kids alone. Let the professor be the lab rat and all his sick friends, who think this is a good idea.

All the vaccines will do for children, is make more of them die or get permanently disabled.  Experimenting on children is a massive, crime against humanity. These people need to be charged and thrown in jail. Experimenting on anyone is a crime against humanity.. Vaccine manufacturers have gotten away with killing and maiming to may people over the years. It is time to stop the madness. Vaccines are not safe. The covid vaccines do nothing to prevent the so called virus. All many of have seen, is the destruction of lives. Anyone, who promotes the vaccines also needs some jail time.

Anyone who thinks the vaccines are wonderful should be the very first to get them. Like the professor and his ilk. Thousands have already been injured or died.

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-oxford-vaccine-to-be-tested-on-children-as-young-as-six-in-world-first-trial-12216667

No child can consent to any experimental drug or trial.

There is absolutely no benefit for any child, to get one of these dangerous experimental vaccines. The only benefit, is for the profits of the drug companies.

All So called Covid vaccines are experimental. I would not even call them a vaccine.

Every single person, who has gotten one, is just a Guinea pig/Lab rat.

They do not even pass the Nuremberg Code. Not one of them.

I am guessing many have not even read this. Well read it.

How many have said to people get the vaccine or loose your job?

Get the vaccine or you cannot fly?

How many have lied, about the safety of the vaccines?

How many governments are pushing the experimental vaccine?

How many were given the vaccine and were not told the truth, about all the side effects? DEATH being a big one.

Has anyone been told they are just a lab rat, that is being experimented upon?

I have to say there is very little informed consent. Even the press has lied about the safety of these vaccines, so they too are guilty.

I read the other day about a teachers union, wanting members to get vaccinated. They are guilty.

Many seniors, do not have the legal capacity, to consent to getting those vaccines.

Anyone giving them a vaccines is guilty. As for the rest, if they are not told the truth about all the side effects including death, those who administer the vaccines, are guilty as well.

And the list goes on.

No one has the right, to attempt to force, use coercion; or other wise con, anyone, to get one these vaccines.

To do so is a crime.

So how many criminals, are breaking the Nuremberg Code, do we have world wide?

This applies world wide. Read it. Print it out and give it to anyone, who is breaking the law. Share it with everyone you know.

The Nuremberg Code

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
   This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
   The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
   experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code

JAB Kids with Covid Vaccines as fast as we can Say SAGE On BBC

Metals, Micro- Nanocontamination found in Vaccines

The Department of Homeland Security issued on Wednesday a nationwide terror alert lasting until April 30, Insanity at it’s finest hour

Canada has become a complete insult to human dignity (your friends or relatives could just vanish)